On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:14:06PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 11 October 2002 3:08 pm, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > Here's the original.
> which appears fine with my copy of today's cvs...
Hmm, and now it's fine on mine.
And now I realize that yesterday I probably opened t
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 04:12:21PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> There is a bug in the automatic reconfiguration code:
> If the user don't have ~/.lyx/lyxrc.default file, then the configure
> script is invoked.
> This is wrong: if the user environment is equal to the system environment,
> then runnin
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 11:25:59AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This seems reasonable to me. Lars?
Do you also want it in 1.2.2cvs ?
> Dekel, note that, if I am not mistaken, you can actually use
> SEARCH_PROG as
>
> SEARCH_PROG([for a PS to PDF converter],ps_to_pdf_command,"ps2pdf
>-d
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 05:49:10PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Attached. It seems that a paragraph containing a float abutted from
> both sides with ERT will send lyx2lyx into a tailspin.
>
Fixed.
On Friday 11 October 2002 2:30 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Is there a LaTeX way to do:
> if (loaded fleqn)
> \mathindent 0em
Already resolved:
\ifx\mathindent\undefined \else \mathindent=0em \fi
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 05:05:19PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Is there some way to easily revert to the previous behavior, and let me
> > put the ctrl-tabs where I want them?
>
> What is "the previous behaviour"? Some magic like that has been in for
> ages.
When converting an inline/display
This is a new feature (again) but does not break anything.
Ok to commit?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Index: formulabase.C
=
I am still waiting for 'yes' or 'no'...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Is the patch reversed? The text above would imply that?
No, I was a little confused when sending the second version of the quote
patch. This one (quotmarks3.diff) corrects some mistakes in the
quotmarks2.diff (guillemots handling) and it is sane to apply IMO (and we
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:56:04PM +0200, Gady Kozma wrote:
> I have an annoying problem with the Edit>Math>EqnArray/Align menu entries
> since 1.2.0, stemming from the fact that LyX now breaks the formula in the
> equal sign when you choose either entry. However, I work in probability and
> ha
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Juergen> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>>> Not good enough. I have left out the «guillemots»
>
| Juergen> Hmpff. The guillemots need the brackets when they are used as
| Juergen
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 12:12:18PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Jean-Marc> OK to apply?
>>
>> I guess yes, would be nice to get someone to test it though.
>
| *sigh*
>
| Just for the record: What is worse than a lockup or a crash?
Code that
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Any chance of a yeah or nay on this one:
yeah
--
Lgb
Hi all.
I have an annoying problem with the Edit>Math>EqnArray/Align menu entries
since 1.2.0, stemming from the fact that LyX now breaks the formula in the
equal sign when you choose either entry. However, I work in probability and
have lots of formulas that look like this
P(X=Y)=...
so whe
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:24:33PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> |num=`expr $num + 1`
>>
>> couldn't this just be written as
>>
>> let num=$num+1
>>
>> ?? Wouldn't that be a bit more portable?
>
| Short test:
>
| poenitz@millo:~ > ash
Any chance of a yeah or nay on this one:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg45713.html
Michael has tested it and says it cures the problem (bug 633).
Angus
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 11 October 2002 12:43 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | On Friday 11 October 2002 12:24 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
| wrote:
>> >> |num=`expr $num + 1`
>> >>
>> >> let num=$num+1
>> >>
>> >>
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 12:12:18PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Jean-Marc> OK to apply?
>>
>> I guess yes, would be nice to get someone to test it though.
>
| *sigh*
>
| Just for the record: What is worse than a lockup or a crash?
>
| I'd thi
On Friday 11 October 2002 12:43 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Friday 11 October 2002 12:24 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
wrote:
> >> |num=`expr $num + 1`
> >>
> >> let num=$num+1
> >>
> >> ?? Wouldn't that be a bit more portable?
> |
> | There
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:24:33PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |num=`expr $num + 1`
>
> couldn't this just be written as
>
> let num=$num+1
>
> ?? Wouldn't that be a bit more portable?
Short test:
poenitz@millo:~ > ash
$ i=1
$ let j=$i+1
let: not found
$ echo `expr $i + 1`
2
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>>Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>>| > Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>| > | +if test -z $GNUM4 ; then
>>>| > This test looks wrong... what h
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 11 October 2002 12:24 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> |num=`expr $num + 1`
>>
>> let num=$num+1
>>
>> ?? Wouldn't that be a bit more portable?
>
| There's no 'let' in sh. The sh way is
| i=`expr $i + 1`
oh well... a bashism th
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 12:12:18PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Jean-Marc> OK to apply?
>
> I guess yes, would be nice to get someone to test it though.
*sigh*
Just for the record: What is worse than a lockup or a crash?
I'd think Jean-Marc had made sure that it works for the reported
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>> Somebody willing to try it out with qt?
Juergen> The problem is that "Save as Default" does not crash with qt
Juergen> (without your patch). Actually, "Save as Default" seems not
Juergen> to wor
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 12:22:31PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> My first question is about the mechanics of this solution. Can I
> use the fleqn option with any document class?
I don't know.
> My second question is should I make this change?
Yes, why not.
[I still consider the preview featur
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Somebody willing to try it out with qt?
The problem is that "Save as Default" does not crash with qt (without your
patch).
Actually, "Save as Default" seems not to work at all there.
Jürgen.
Attached. It seems that a paragraph containing a float abutted from
both sides with ERT will send lyx2lyx into a tailspin.
This seems remotely similar to Hawk of Slytherin's depth cascading
bug.
Martin
--
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Helsinki University of Technology
Department of Survey
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| It is better to generate a Postscript file that is printer independent (using
| scalable fonts).
Depends on you objective. If you want best possible output, you
absolutely want the postscript generated specifically for the printer
in question.
--
On Friday 11 October 2002 12:24 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |num=`expr $num + 1`
>
> let num=$num+1
>
> ?? Wouldn't that be a bit more portable?
There's no 'let' in sh. The sh way is
i=`expr $i + 1`
Angus
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre> New Doc, Layout->Doceument->Save as Document Defaults, Yes.
| Andre> Boom.
>
| Andre> Does anybody else se
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>>"Rob" == Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Rob> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>"Rob" == Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Rob> - Locating GNU m4... not found. [...] No
On Friday 11 October 2002 2:06 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Actually I wonder a bit why there is identical code in
> > frontends/xforms and forntends/controllers... once as
> > 'saveAsDefault and once as saveParamsAsDefault)
>
> Edwin did the controller-view split onl
On Friday 11 October 2002 1:06 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Any chance of a yeah or nay on this one:
> Angus>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg45713.h
>tml
>
> Angus> Michael has tested it and says i
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> Not good enough. I have left out the «guillemots»
Juergen> Hmpff. The guillemots need the brackets when they are used as
Juergen> closing quotes (otherwise the space to the next word is
Ju
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> New Doc, Layout->Doceument->Save as Document Defaults, Yes.
Andre> Boom.
Andre> Does anybody else see this?
Jean-Marc> I think the attached patch fixes the pro
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Dekel> Due to bugs in Acrobat Reader, it is preferable to use the
| Dekel> -dCompatibilityLevel=1.3 flag of ps2pdf (or use ps2pdf13). This
| Dekel> requires the Acrobat >= 4 to read the f
You may have noticed that previews of equations in display style
have a large amount of embedded space to the left of the
equation. This means that, when switching from preview mode to
edit mode, the user gets a nasty jump in his view of the
equation.
I've been chatting with David Kastrup abo
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 10:47:47AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> 1/ we have to work on systems which have none of these things
Then the ps->printer converter is lpr.
If the user need something more complicated, he can write a dialog
in tcl/tk, python/tk, etc.
In fact, we can provide a s
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> My first question is about the mechanics of this solution. Can
Angus> I use the fleqn option with any document class?
At worst, it will do nothing. Would that be a problem for you?
JMarc
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | > Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | > | +if test -z $GNUM4 ; then
>> | > This test looks wrong... what happens if GNUM4 is not set?
>> is is
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:44:31PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So my patch does not really harm there?
No, does not harm at all. Please apply.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> So what is the problem then?
That m4 sees the backticks and is unhappy because its defaults quotes
are `like this'. This is an m4 error, not a sh one.
We should probably still require m4 until this script is rewritten in
pure
I haven't been bit for a couple of weeks, but knowing that it's a hard
to solve problem, I assume that it will byte again.
I'm already running lyx in a debugger all the time (I've aliased ly to
xterm -iconic -n lyxterm -e gdb /usr/local/bin/lyx -x ~/.scripts/lyxrun &
and the script is merely "ru
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Actually I wonder a bit why there is identical code in frontends/xforms and
> forntends/controllers... once as 'saveAsDefault and once as
> saveParamsAsDefault)
Edwin did the controller-view split only for qt. The xforms document dialog
does not use ControlDocument (unless
On Friday 11 October 2002 3:08 pm, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 04:20:26PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:16:11AM -0400, Dr. Richard E.
Hawkins wrote:
> > > > If you have a file doesn't work, post it here.
> > >
> > > Here's one from November, 2
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:34:49PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Actually, "Save as Default" seems not to work at all there.
I just had a look, seems not to be implenmented at all.
Actually I wonder a bit why there is identical code in frontends/xforms and
forntends/controllers... once as
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>"Rob" == Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Rob> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
"Rob" == Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
> Rob> - Locating GNU m4... not found. [...] No GNU m4.
> Rob> Impossible to build lib/config
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> The problem is that "Save as Default" does not crash with qt
> Juergen> (without your patch). Actually, "Save as Default" seems not
> Juergen> to work at all there.
>
> So my patch does not really harm there?
I cannot imagine that it does (pressing the butto
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:56:01PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | I did not check the other shells ;-)
>
> I care a rats ass about ash... the only thing that I care about is
> bash and sh.
Come on. I started with 'ls /bin | grep sh' and went top down...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to gi
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 04:20:26PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:16:11AM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > > If you have a file doesn't work, post it here.
> > Here's one from November, 2000:
> > #LyX 1.3 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
> >
On Friday 11 October 2002 3:03 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> maybe committing the header file would be in order, too?
Thank you. Done.
A
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 11:33:50AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> >Just that the original thread was about whether we should hardcode the
> >use of dvips.
>
> What's against? What's in favour? Are there alternatives?
> Hardcode dvips would imply a strict dependency of LyX on dvips.
> It also would me
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Any chance of a yeah or nay on this one:
Angus> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg45713.html
Angus> Michael has tested it and says it cures the problem (bug 633).
How sure are you that it works? I want to be
maybe committing the header file would be in order, too?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
[from lyx-users]
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:49:29AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> te_etex-1.0.7-319
> tetex-latex-heb-1.0-3
> te_latex-1.0.7-285
> tetex-1.0.7-285
>
> The problem is that the dependencies built into the .rpm are for RedHat
> packages, and naming differs between RedHat and SuSE.
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 12:12:18PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> | Jean-Marc> OK to apply?
>>>
>>> I guess yes, would be nice to get someone to test it though.
>>
Lars>
On Friday 11 October 2002 11:43 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Any chance of a yeah or nay on this one:
>
> yeah
Thank you.
Jean-Marc, shall I apply it to 1.2.X too?
Angus
On Friday 11 October 2002 1:20 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> My first question is about the mechanics of this
> solution. Can Angus> I use the fleqn option with any document
> class?
>
> At worst, it will do nothing. Would t
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 12:50:04PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > but the exe-ticks are still a problem, right?
>
> I don't see why. Continuing André's test:
I think he meant using $(...) instead of `...`
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have
> "Rob" == Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Rob" == Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Rob> - Locating GNU m4... not found. [...] No GNU m4.
Rob> Impossible to build lib/configure -- aborting
Rob> and the
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 10:51:59AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Andre Poenitz wrote:
> | > I have no strong opinion or even an idea on how to solve that, I just
> | > want to say that there _is_ a problem. A serious one to be precise.
> |
> |
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>"Rob" == Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Rob> - Locating GNU m4... not found. [...] No GNU m4.
> Rob> Impossible to build lib/configure -- aborting
>
> Rob>
>
> Rob> and the script exits, leaving an incomplete resul
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> the test will be rewritten as:
>
> if test -z ; then
>
> if GNUM4 is not set or is set to empty var.
>
> imho the best way to solve is the x$GNUM != xyes trick, since that
> requires the least of the test features.
Don't use "yes", since GNUM4 is either
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> Due to bugs in Acrobat Reader, it is preferable to use the
Dekel> -dCompatibilityLevel=1.3 flag of ps2pdf (or use ps2pdf13). This
Dekel> requires the Acrobat >= 4 to read the file, but this is a
Dekel> reasonable requirement.
This se
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > | +if test -z $GNUM4 ; then
> | > This test looks wrong... what happens if GNUM4 is not set?
>
> is isolation the test is not robust enough, and
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 12:40:45PM -0400, Dan Bikel wrote:
>>> That does not appear to work, either. Any other suggestions?
Andre> M-~S-less
Jean-Marc> Lars, I
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | +if test -z $GNUM4 ; then
>>
>> This test looks wrong... what happens if GNUM4 is not set?
>
> Hey, look at the scipt. The script does now:
Sorry, I missed your point completely. I apologize.
The
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | +if test -z $GNUM4 ; then
| > This test looks wrong... what happens if GNUM4 is not set?
is isolation the test is not robust enough, and it costs nothing to
make it robust.
--
> "Rob" == Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> - Locating GNU m4... not found. [...] No GNU m4.
Rob> Impossible to build lib/configure -- aborting
Rob>
Rob> and the script exits, leaving an incomplete result of autogen.sh!
Note that I am not sure that b
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | +if test -z $GNUM4 ; then
>
> This test looks wrong... what happens if GNUM4 is not set?
Hey, look at the scipt. The script does now:
# Autogenerate lib/configure.m4.
if test x$GNUM4 != x ; then
echo -n "Building li
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Andre> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 12:40:45PM -0400, Dan Bikel wrote:
| >> That does not appear to work, either. Any other suggestions?
|
| Andre> M-~S-less
|
| Lars, I guess that the
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| +ACLOCAL=aclocal
| +AUTOHEADER="autoheader"
| +AUTOMAKE="automake -a -c --foreign"
| +AUTOCONF="autoconf"
| +
This change is ok.
| echo -n "Locating GNU m4... "
| +GNUM4=
| for prog in $M4 gm4 gnum4 m4 ; do
| - case `$prog --version 2>&1` in
| -*G
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 10:02:42AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Not in stability terms, probably, but there is still some cleanups to
> do to the `plain' (ie xforms) version. And there is the qt version,
> which still is not working completely (from what I read, I personally
> just cannot
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Another option that _might_ work slightly better is to branch the
| releases not from CVS head of some arbitrary day but from 'best CVS within
| the last few month'. So if many people are happy with 'early August' but
| not with 'September 20', we could
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre Poenitz wrote:
| > I have no strong opinion or even an idea on how to solve that, I just
| > want to say that there _is_ a problem. A serious one to be precise.
|
| Would it be really such a bad idea to branch off 1.4.0 immediately at the
| moment 1
> "Rob" == Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> But then, we have to make sure that there is no loss of
>> functionality.
Rob> Have a look at one of these printing tools, xpp, qtcups etc. I
Rob> think we only gain functionality.
1/ we have to work on sy
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 12:40:45PM -0400, Dan Bikel wrote:
>> That does not appear to work, either. Any other suggestions?
Andre> M-~S-less
Lars, I guess that the following patch is OK?
JMarc
Index: lib/ChangeLog
Hi,
If you allow me some comments,
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Yes there are bugs, and there always will be bugs. But they cannot be
> that serious. I've been using 1.3.0 from almost its start for three
> papers already; no serious problems at all; I'm not a power user,
though.
André Poenitz wrote:
>
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>But I am not sure that these are the bugs which prevent us from
>>shipping 1.3.0.
>
>
> Probably not.
>
> But there are things like the undo crashs that have been in for ages
> without any improvment on the horizon.
Well maybe there is light on the horizont. I'm actuall
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> But then, we have to make sure that there is no loss of functionality.
Have a look at one of these printing tools, xpp, qtcups etc.
I think we only gain functionality.
Rob.
> "Rob" == Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> Another thing that keeps popping up in my humble mind: is the
Rob> present 1.3.0 as it is now, that much worse than the present
Rob> 1.2.x release; in stability terms, that is.
Not in stability terms, probably, but there is still some cl
> "Rob" == Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Just that the original thread was about whether we should hardcode
>> the use of dvips.
Rob> What's against? What's in favour? Are there alternatives?
Rob> Hardcode dvips would imply a strict dependency of
82 matches
Mail list logo
