Hi,
If you allow me some comments, Rob Lahaye wrote: > Yes there are bugs, and there always will be bugs. But they cannot be > that serious. I've been using 1.3.0 from almost its start for three > papers already; no serious problems at all; I'm not a power user, though. André Poenitz wrote: > Hm... On those days I really _use_ LyX I have one crash or so on > average, almost always in 'undo'. But so far no single line has been > lost [lucky me...] As I understand, the separation between the user interface and the kernel means that most fixes for xforms will also hold for qt, so it seems a waste of "testing and debuging power" not releasing lyx 1.3.0 now. Users will find bugs that will keep busy developers not working in qt, and also when qt be finished it will have 2 or 3 months of kernel and backend debuging. The question is therefore why not use the toolkit independency that you beautifully developped to increase production speed? It seems like having a dual processor running linux compiled without SMP. Cheers, João.
