Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | > Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | > | +if test -z $GNUM4 ; then
>> | > This test looks wrong... what happens if GNUM4 is not set?
>> is isolation the test is not robust enough, and it costs nothing to
>> make it robust.
>
| Do you mean by robust:
>
| if test x$GNUM4 = x ; then
>
| ?
>
| If so, can you do that and apply the rest of my patch; or want me to do
| it in my tree and send a new patch to the list ?
That would be nice (new patch.)
--
Lgb
