Re: FormLog.C: Build log archaic?

2002-10-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:45:15AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote: > but my compiler doesn't like this and complains that the second "input" > is unknown. Is my compiler funny, or is this example code wrong? I think the code is wrong. >CheckedGlueLength::CheckedGlueLength(FL_OBJECT * input, >

Re: [Patch] fix sizes when drawing arrays

2002-10-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:07:19AM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 11:29:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > I am not sure that the standard demands that the object cannot be > > reclaimd before the end of scope. > > Aehm. You are right of course. It dies at the end

Re: [Patch] fix sizes when drawing arrays

2002-10-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 11:29:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I am not sure that the standard demands that the object cannot be > reclaimd before the end of scope. Aehm. You are right of course. It dies at the end of the full expression which is too early. So there must be a dummy varia

Re: FormLog.C: Build log archaic?

2002-10-01 Thread Rob Lahaye
Rob Lahaye wrote: > Rob Lahaye wrote: > >> Angus Leeming wrote: >> >>> >>> But, sure, this is a sample piece of code. You may find this preferable: >>> CheckedGlueLength(FL_OBJECT * input, >>> FL_OBJECT * choice, >>> FL_OBJECT * label=input); >>> Ie, the default value

Re: FormLog.C: Build log archaic?

2002-10-01 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Rob Lahaye wrote: > Rob Lahaye wrote: > > Angus Leeming wrote: > > > >> > >> But, sure, this is a sample piece of code. You may find this preferable: > >> CheckedGlueLength(FL_OBJECT * input, > >> FL_OBJECT * choice, > >> FL_OBJECT * label=input); >

An Addition for "emacs.bind"

2002-10-01 Thread John Weiss
Well, after upgrading to v1.2.x, I began the task of merging changes in with my local customizations. Imagine my glee at seeing the "command-sequence" binding! At last --- we can add a proper char-transpose to the Emacs bindings! Below are two lines, to be added to "emacs.bind" and "xemacs.bin

Re: FormLog.C: Build log archaic?

2002-10-01 Thread Rob Lahaye
Rob Lahaye wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > >> >> But, sure, this is a sample piece of code. You may find this preferable: >> CheckedGlueLength(FL_OBJECT * input, >> FL_OBJECT * choice, >> FL_OBJECT * label=input); >> Ie, the default value for the third arg is the same

Re: FormLog.C: Build log archaic?

2002-10-01 Thread Rob Lahaye
Angus Leeming wrote: > > But, sure, this is a sample piece of code. You may find this preferable: > CheckedGlueLength(FL_OBJECT * input, > FL_OBJECT * choice, > FL_OBJECT * label=input); > Ie, the default value for the third arg is the same as the

VACATION IN ORLANDO FLORIDA

2002-10-01 Thread
Have you seen the wonders of Orlando, Florida? Imagine spending your next vacation in the most beautiful vacation destination this country has to offer. Spend time with your kids in one or more of the numerous parks such as Disney World’s Epcot Center, Universal Studios Florida, Sea World,

prosper.sty

2002-10-01 Thread Ed Gatzke
Better support for prosper.sty would be nice. FYI, prosper allows you to create nice pdf slide shows similar to powerpoint presentations with animations and slide transitions. It uses pstricks. I have kludged it together with LyX, but the editor text is a real mess with TeX code all over the

Re: [Patch] fix sizes when drawing arrays

2002-10-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | | On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:26:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: | | > Looks like we've been found out as ignorant. One more reason for | | > IU: people might read the code ;-) | | | | It's like the

Re: [Patch] fix sizes when drawing arrays

2002-10-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:26:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: | > Looks like we've been found out as ignorant. One more reason for | > IU: people might read the code ;-) | | It's like the the Path from support/path.[Ch] It is not. Path() will not c

Re: [Patch] fix sizes when drawing arrays

2002-10-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:04:33PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: | > I know that is semantics only, but is this not more transparent: | > | > void MathArrayInset::metrics(MathMetricsInfo & mi) const | > { | > + if (mi.base.style == LM_ST_DISPLAY) | >

Re: Lyx will not link on MacOsX 10.2 - can't find libjpeg

2002-10-01 Thread Keeron Ögren
Testing around writing in the src/Makefile I tried switching around -ljpeg and -lforms - finding out that it didn't matter. But changing the LIBS variable, including -lforms and -ljpeg semed logical and made some diference - but I got the same error from ld, besides that there are no Undefined sym

Re: [Patch] fix sizes when drawing arrays

2002-10-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:26:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > With the tiny problem that it does not work. The Changer > > undoes its changes when it goes out of scope. When I think about it: Maybe you'll like the following patch more: Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in orde

Re: [Patch] fix sizes when drawing arrays

2002-10-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:26:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Looks like we've been found out as ignorant. One more reason for > IU: people might read the code ;-) It's like the the Path from support/path.[Ch] And changing temporarily single members it is _much_ faster than making full copie

Re: [Patch] fix sizes when drawing arrays

2002-10-01 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 6:16 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > With the tiny problem that it does not work. The Changer > undoes its changes when it goes out of scope. Looks like we've been found out as ignorant. One more reason for IU: people might read the code ;-) Angus

Re: [Patch] fix sizes when drawing arrays

2002-10-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:04:33PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > I know that is semantics only, but is this not more transparent: > > void MathArrayInset::metrics(MathMetricsInfo & mi) const > { > + if (mi.base.style == LM_ST_DISPLAY) > + MathStyleChanger(mi.base, LM_ST_TEXT); >

Re: [Patch] fix sizes when drawing arrays

2002-10-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 01 October 2002 5:50 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: | > The inherited 'draw' is not good enough (Fonts too large) | > The patch fixes this properly and is straight-forward. | > | > Ok? | > | > Andre' | | I know that is semantics only, but is this

Re: [Patch] fix sizes when drawing arrays

2002-10-01 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 5:50 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > The inherited 'draw' is not good enough (Fonts too large) > The patch fixes this properly and is straight-forward. > > Ok? > > Andre' I know that is semantics only, but is this not more transparent: void MathArrayInset::metrics(MathMetr

[Patch] fix sizes when drawing arrays

2002-10-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
The inherited 'draw' is not good enough (Fonts too large) The patch fixes this properly and is straight-forward. Ok? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson) Index: math_arrayinset.C =

Re: FormLog.C: Build log archaic?

2002-10-01 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 05:08:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Incidentally, John, would not this be a good thing in Qt too? possibly john -- "When your name is Winner, that's it. You don't need a nickname." - Loser Lane

Re: FormLog.C: Build log archaic?

2002-10-01 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 4:29 pm, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:26:16AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote: > > When I do "cvs diff -Nu > cvs.diff", the file has in the top > > lines: ? src/frontends/xforms/checkedwidgets.C > > ? src/frontends/xforms/checkedwidgets.h > > Get Lars to give y

Re: FormLog.C: Build log archaic?

2002-10-01 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 4:26 pm, Rob Lahaye wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > Incidentally, you remember your request about removing the > > text_warning area and instead setting the widget label to > > red if the input is invalid? > > > > Well attached is a proper patch that does just this for

Re: FormLog.C: Build log archaic?

2002-10-01 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:26:16AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote: > When I do "cvs diff -Nu > cvs.diff", the file has in the top lines: > ? src/frontends/xforms/checkedwidgets.C > ? src/frontends/xforms/checkedwidgets.h Get Lars to give you readonly CVS access john -- "When your name is Winner, that'

Re: FormLog.C: Build log archaic?

2002-10-01 Thread Rob Lahaye
Angus Leeming wrote: > > Incidentally, you remember your request about removing the > text_warning area and instead setting the widget label to red if > the input is invalid? > > Well attached is a proper patch that does just this for > LyXGlueLengths and which I have implemented for the Spac

Re: Lyx will not link on MacOsX 10.2 - can't find libjpeg

2002-10-01 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 4:16 pm, Keeron Ögren wrote: Hello Keeron, > g++ -O -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -o lyx BufferView.o [snip] > vc-backend.o version.o vspace.o -L/usr/local/lib > mathed/.libs/libmathed.a insets/.libs/libinsets.a > frontends/.libs/libfrontends.a -ljpeg -lforms > graphics/.

Lyx will not link on MacOsX 10.2 - can't find libjpeg

2002-10-01 Thread Keeron Ögren
Doesn't know if this a bug in Lyx or some other place. Or just me far out;-) Im trying to compile LyX on a MacOS X 10.2 (thats jaguar- the new distribution). I ceep on geting a error linking against libjpeg. I have compiled the libjpeg.a myself - i compiled the static - not the shared library b

Re: this file has the cascade problem really bad!

2002-10-01 Thread Dr. Richard E. Hawkins
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 09:39:13AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 08:40:25AM +0100, Jos? Ab?lio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > Reading Martin's messages I don't think that the problem is related with > > lyx2lyx but with the new counter code. Maybe I am wrong, in that case I w

Re: [PATCH]: FormWrap.C

2002-10-01 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 12:46 pm, John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:17:54PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > I was under the impression that we were allowing the direct > > entry of GlueLengths but were forcing LyXLengths to be > > always valid. Is that not the case? > > It's not th

Re: [PATCH]: FormWrap.C

2002-10-01 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:17:54PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > I was under the impression that we were allowing the direct > entry of GlueLengths but were forcing LyXLengths to be always > valid. Is that not the case? It's not the case, I bellieve. Entering "3in" is quicker for the power use

Re: FormLog.C: Build log archaic?

2002-10-01 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 11:41 am, Rob Lahaye wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:06:26AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > >>In english: > >>If the logfile is from a Literate programming build > >>set the title of the dialog appropriately > >>load the data into the

Re: [PATCH]: FormWrap.C

2002-10-01 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 11:48 am, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > This trivial patch allows input of doubles only rather than > > complaining about non-doubles. > > But you know that this disables direct inserting of > lenght+unit ("3in")? I was under the impression that

Re: [PATCH]: FormWrap.C

2002-10-01 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Angus Leeming wrote: > This trivial patch allows input of doubles only rather than > complaining about non-doubles. But you know that this disables direct inserting of lenght+unit ("3in")? Jürgen.

Re: this file has the cascade problem really bad!

2002-10-01 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:08:57PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:59:04AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > > | I have a fix for this bug. > > | I'll commit shortly. > > > > Can you send the patch to the list so that we can see what the problem was? > > The problem wa

Re: FormLog.C: Build log archaic?

2002-10-01 Thread Rob Lahaye
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:06:26AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > >>In english: >>If the logfile is from a Literate programming build >> set the title of the dialog appropriately >> load the data into the browser. >> if this loading fails >> infor

[PATCH]: FormWrap.C

2002-10-01 Thread Angus Leeming
This trivial patch allows input of doubles only rather than complaining about non-doubles. Ok to apply? Angus Index: src/frontends/xforms/FormWrap.C === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/FormWrap.C,v

Re: Is baywatch down?

2002-10-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | My CVS repository sync-up is not happening. Do you still have the same problem? if host +trace batwatch.lyx.org shows that you get the wrong answer from one of the root dns servers (wrong == not 80.232.38.163) Then try to use cvs.lyx.org inste

Re: this file has the cascade problem really bad!

2002-10-01 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:59:04AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > | I have a fix for this bug. > | I'll commit shortly. > > Can you send the patch to the list so that we can see what the problem was? The problem was if the lyx file look like this: \layout Enumerate ... \layout LaTeX \end

Re: FormLog.C: Build log archaic?

2002-10-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:06:26AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > In english: > If the logfile is from a Literate programming build > set the title of the dialog appropriately > load the data into the browser. > if this loading fails > inform the viewer > retur

Re: FormLog.C: Build log archaic?

2002-10-01 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 9:48 am, Rob Lahaye wrote: > Hi, > > In src/frontends/xforms/FormLog.C I find: > > * \author John Levon > [...] > void FormLog::update() > { > fl_clear_browser(dialog_->browser); > > if (controller().logfile().first == Buffer::buildlog) { > fl

Re: this file has the cascade problem really bad!

2002-10-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 09:34:31AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | > "Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | yikes! | > | > Jose, Dekel. Could you have a look at this? | | I have a fix for this bug. | I'll commit shortly. Can

Re: this file has the cascade problem really bad!

2002-10-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 01 October 2002 08:34, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > "Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | yikes! | > | > Jose, Dekel. Could you have a look at this? | | Reading Martin's messages I don't think that the p

Re: this file has the cascade problem really bad!

2002-10-01 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 09:44, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 08:49:57AM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > One other change is to make lyx2lyx fix this problem, it should be easy > > but it will only hide the current problem. > > If it does not break anything I'd li

FormLog.C: Build log archaic?

2002-10-01 Thread Rob Lahaye
Hi, In src/frontends/xforms/FormLog.C I find: * \author John Levon [...] void FormLog::update() { fl_clear_browser(dialog_->browser); if (controller().logfile().first == Buffer::buildlog) { fl_set_form_title(dialog_->form, _("Build log")); if (

Re: this file has the cascade problem really bad!

2002-10-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 08:49:57AM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > One other change is to make lyx2lyx fix this problem, it should be easy but > it will only hide the current problem. If it does not break anything I'd like to see this worked around by lyx2lyx as the "deeper" code is

Re: this file has the cascade problem really bad!

2002-10-01 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 08:39, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 08:40:25AM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > Reading Martin's messages I don't think that the problem is related > > with lyx2lyx but with the new counter code. Maybe I am wrong, in that > > case I will t

Re: this file has the cascade problem really bad!

2002-10-01 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 09:15, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > I have a fix for this bug. > I'll commit shortly. Oops, looking for file header I saw 1.2 and thought that this was a 220 file. It appears not. My mistake. -- José Abílio

Re: Label dialogs

2002-10-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:34:14AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > My problem is that I have time in June and then only at the end of > August or September, but don't care too much for me it is entierly > possible that I will have the same problems next year Jean-Marc had > this year to attend the m

Re: Label dialogs

2002-10-01 Thread Juergen Vigna
Andre Poenitz wrote: > Apropos comments: What about my poll for next year's meeting? > You did not answer that... > > [Juergen: June might be a bit early. Lectures end on July 18th, and our > "room" might get a bit quieter a week or two after that... this would > mean "around August 1st" which is

Re: Label dialogs

2002-10-01 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 7:17 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 07:41:07PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > xforms has a dialog for the mathed label and qt doesn't. I'm > > trying to initiate a discussion on how best to change that. > > Ahem... mathed labels do _not_ use the dial

Re: this file has the cascade problem really bad!

2002-10-01 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 09:34:31AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > "Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | yikes! > > Jose, Dekel. Could you have a look at this? I have a fix for this bug. I'll commit shortly.

Re: this file has the cascade problem really bad!

2002-10-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 08:40:25AM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > Reading Martin's messages I don't think that the problem is related with > lyx2lyx but with the new counter code. Maybe I am wrong, in that case I will > take a look. Well. Is the .lyx produced by lyx2lyx ok or not?

Re: this file has the cascade problem really bad!

2002-10-01 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 08:34, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > "Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | yikes! > > Jose, Dekel. Could you have a look at this? Reading Martin's messages I don't think that the problem is related with lyx2lyx but with the new counter code. Maybe I

Re: this file has the cascade problem really bad!

2002-10-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | yikes! Jose, Dekel. Could you have a look at this? -- Lgb