This template stuff is seriously undebuggable :(
spellchecker is not showing my tree. Can somebody explain the exact path
of calls from cp.show() in guiapi.C to actually calling the xforms
build/show stuff ? I /cannot/ follow it at all- where does the show()
actually get inherited ?
grepping fo
---NOTICE---
This message is to notify you of an investigation on you by an "iDetect 2002" user. We
Have Blocked The "iDetect 2002" user's Identity for Security reasons. Don't Be Scared,
You are not going to jail. This just means that someone saw you online an
from ert116.lyx :
This is converted wrongly because we have an inset
inside ERT.
Note no space after "inset". This is read in as "insetinside".
Is this correct ?
regards
john
--
"The simpler it is, the harder it is."
- Tim Van Holder
lst[2].htm
Description: Binary data
// slightly tricky because we want to loop around
Buffer::inset_iterator const begin(bv_->buffer()->inset_iterator_begin());
Buffer::inset_iterator const end(bv_->buffer()->inset_iterator_end());
Buffer::inset_iterator orig(cur.par(), cur.pos());
if (ori
Would it be relevent to mention that in TeX tabular and matricies *are*
implemented using the same basic command, namely \halign? Matricies construct
math boxes using a template contianing math shifts (aka $ signs) and tabular
uses a template without math shifts. Plain TeX's \cases uses a templat
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 09:26:53PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> How did you create the file ?
No idea, it may have come off the wire (lyx-users)
> If I load the file in lyx 1.1.6 and save it, the two lines above become one
> line.
> So should the lyx2lyx script handle "semi-valid" lyx files,
> na
On Friday 02 August 2002 9:25 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Log message:
> Change the LyX file format, adding a "preview" flag to Include insets.
> Document this change in a new file FORMAT.
> Enable the user to toggle preview status by modifying the Include dialog.
Ok guys. Pr
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 06:34:29PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> \pextra_type 2 \pextra_alignment 0 \pextra_hfill 1 \pextra_start_minipage 1
> \pextra_widthp 40
How did you create the file ?
If I load the file in lyx 1.1.6 and save it, the two lines above become one
line.
So should the lyx2lyx scr
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 06:29:21PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> this 218 format gives unknown token
The lyx2lyx script in CVS does not convert ERT to insetERT.
I'm currently working on the code for doing this.
attached gives :
IndexError: list index out of range
regards
john
--
"The simpler it is, the harder it is."
- Tim Van Holder
#LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 218
\textclass article
\language ngerman
\inputencoding latin1
\fontscheme psla
load attached doc
Can somebody create lyx-tests module now ?? :)
john
--
"The simpler it is, the harder it is."
- Tim Van Holder
#LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 220
\textclass article
\begin_preamble
\newcommand\myTwoFig[2]{%
\raise
On Friday 02 August 2002 18:23, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 06:14:25PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > > ImportError: No module named error
> >
> > Do you have installed lyx? The other options would be for you to have .
> > in your path. :-)
>
> Oh, whoops, it comes
this 218 format gives unknown token
john
--
"The simpler it is, the harder it is."
- Tim Van Holder
#LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 218
\textclass article
\language ngerman
\inputencoding auto
\fontscheme default
\graphics default
\paperf
this 220 format file won't load in current CVS properly (see stderr)
john
--
"The simpler it is, the harder it is."
- Tim Van Holder
#LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 220
\textclass book
\begin_preamble
\usepackage{fullpage}
\end_preamble
\
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 06:14:25PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > ImportError: No module named error
>
> Do you have installed lyx? The other options would be for you to have . in
> your path. :-)
Oh, whoops, it comes with lyx2lyx sorry. Pilot error. It works now.
Now I shall
On Friday 02 August 2002 18:03, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 05:58:43PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > How do you run it?
> > Does it works if you run it from command line?
>
> moz moz 109 lyx2lyx ~/src/lyx/lyx-tests/testlongtable.lyx
> Traceback (innermost last):
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 05:58:43PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> How do you run it?
> Does it works if you run it from command line?
moz moz 109 lyx2lyx ~/src/lyx/lyx-tests/testlongtable.lyx
Traceback (innermost last):
File "/usr/bin/lyx2lyx", line 19, in ?
from error impo
On Friday 02 August 2002 17:50, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 07:29:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > Please fix this (buffer.C?).
> > I don't have a CVS copy right now.
>
> Will do. Alas, it doesn't work :
How do you run it?
Does it works if you run it from command line?
> Imp
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 07:29:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Please fix this (buffer.C?).
> I don't have a CVS copy right now.
Will do. Alas, it doesn't work :
ImportError: No module named error
moz src 328 rpm -q python
python-1.5.2-27
regards
john
--
"The simpler it is, the harder it is.
On Friday 02 August 2002 16:45, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > all the path from 2.10 until present covered.
>
> Denoting by lyx-n the version of lyx that generates file format 2.14,
> you can open in lyx-n the files UserGuide.lyx & Extended.lyx that come with
> lyx-n, and save them.
That is the method
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 06:18:16PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Log message:
> Revert John's change as it breaks reading of the user preamble.
Actually break is /right/
I'll jsut forget about this patch for now !
john
--
"The simpler it is, the harder it is."
- Tim Van H
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 05:12:02PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> CVS is still trying to run a non-existent lyxconvert
>
Please fix this (buffer.C?).
I don't have a CVS copy right now.
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:51:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I'm sorry to tell you that reverting it did indeed fix the problem.
+ if (compare_ascii_no_case(token, endtoken) == 0)
+ break;
*d'oh*
let me try again, and I'll check preamble this time :)
re
On Friday 02 August 2002 4:41 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:11:14PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > It's empty! See below.
> > This is current cvs; all was fine until I updated to include John's
> > lyxlex patch and André's changes to mathed...
>
> Can you try back out lyxlex
CVS is still trying to run a non-existent lyxconvert
regards
john
--
"The simpler it is, the harder it is."
- Tim Van Holder
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:32:11PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Friday 02 August 2002 15:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > I will be away next week, and it seems that I have not been able to
> >[...]
>
> I will also be away (2 weeks), I have almost finished the transition bet
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:11:14PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> It's empty! See below.
> This is current cvs; all was fine until I updated to include John's lyxlex
> patch and André's changes to mathed...
Can you try back out lyxlex please ? And commit the revert if it fixes
it
patch looked o
It's empty! See below.
This is current cvs; all was fine until I updated to include John's lyxlex
patch and André's changes to mathed...
Angus
Only the user preamble is affected:
\makeatletter
%% User specified LaTeX commands.
On Friday 02 August 2002 15:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I will be away next week, and it seems that I have not been able to
>[...]
I will also be away (2 weeks), I have almost finished the transition between
2.16 and 2.17.
In the week after my return I will finish 2.17 to 218 (it is m
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:58:24PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I will be away next week, and it seems that I have not been able to
> release 1.2.1. Sorry about that. I am still pondering whether the ugly
> mathed redraw problems that I am seeing are something new in 1.2.1cvs
> or not (I h
I will be away next week, and it seems that I have not been able to
release 1.2.1. Sorry about that. I am still pondering whether the ugly
mathed redraw problems that I am seeing are something new in 1.2.1cvs
or not (I have one more patch in my tree which is John's optimization
of workarea event
On Friday 02 August 2002 2:57 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 12:38:06PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Friday 02 August 2002 1:01 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > BTW, you should use add {} around the #1:
> > > \newcommand{\Vector}[1]{\boldsymbol{#1}}
> >
> > I'm LaTeX-ignorant. Wh
On Friday 02 August 2002 2:42 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 12:37:11PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > However...
> >
> > I think I've come to the opposite conclusion. If we overload addPreview
> > then things like tables could generate a preview of the entire table if
> > they s
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 12:38:06PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 02 August 2002 1:01 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > BTW, you should use add {} around the #1:
> > \newcommand{\Vector}[1]{\boldsymbol{#1}}
>
> I'm LaTeX-ignorant. Why?
An example:
\boldsymbol{\hat{x}} gives a correct output.
\
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 03:40:34PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I have only two arms...
> (I am a real looser typing with my toes)
heh :)
Seriously, the user can surely type tabular-insert 5 5 if they don't
want any gui nastiness no ?
Same goes for the lyxserver
regards
john
--
"The
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 12:37:11PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> However...
>
> I think I've come to the opposite conclusion. If we overload addPreview then
> things like tables could generate a preview of the entire table if they so
> desired.
If you want to preview a table, you can always ov
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 03:28:49PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> | tabular-insert --> bring up the dialog
>>
>> Of course it shouldn't bring up the dialog, but rather ask for the
>> dimensions in the minibuffer
>
| You write the code for it then
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Is the change from the while loop to find_first_no_of correct ?
John> Just double checking
Yes, it seems correct.
JMarc
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 03:28:49PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | tabular-insert --> bring up the dialog
>
> Of course it shouldn't bring up the dialog, but rather ask for the
> dimensions in the minibuffer
You write the code for it then !
> | tabular-insert 5 5 --> insert the table
>
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Is the change from the while loop to find_first_no_of correct ? Just
| double checking
>From my quick glance it seems right.
--
Lgb
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 03:21:39PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> | One brings up the dialog and is called by the menus. The other is for
>> | minibuffer. It is trivial to merge the two, I will do this.
>>
>> what do you gain by that?
>
| Less co
Is the change from the while loop to find_first_no_of correct ? Just
double checking
regards
john
diff -u -r1.32 lyxlex.C
--- lyxlex.C28 Jul 2002 22:50:05 - 1.32
+++ lyxlex.C2 Aug 2002 12:53:00 -
@@ -168,29 +168,28 @@
// We do a case independent comparison,
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 03:21:39PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | One brings up the dialog and is called by the menus. The other is for
> | minibuffer. It is trivial to merge the two, I will do this.
>
> what do you gain by that?
Less code.
> will it still be possible to do ti from the
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 07:56:09AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457
>>
>> BTW, John, why do we have both LFUN_DIALOG_TABULAR_INSERT
>> and LFUN_INSET_TABULAR? What is the difference?
>
| One brings up the di
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 01:43:54PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > Which is particularly prone to missing stuff, of course. we should start
> > development/FORMAT or something and make it a shooting offence to change
> > file format without adding to this file
>
> We should have b
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 12:33:44PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I looked more closely. This is what you and I are both looking for.
>
> void InsetFormulaBase::insetUnlock(BufferView * bv)
> {
> if (mathcursor) {
> if (mathcursor->inMacroMode()) {
> mathc
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 07:56:09AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457
>
> BTW, John, why do we have both LFUN_DIALOG_TABULAR_INSERT
> and LFUN_INSET_TABULAR? What is the difference?
One brings up the dialog and is called by the menus. The other is for
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 12:26:04PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Ok, so this bit is a bad idea, but the rest holds.
>
> One question:
>
> aleem@pneumon:devel-> grep "editing()" src/mathed/*.h
> src/mathed/math_nestinset.h:virtual bool editing() const;
>
> why is editing() virtual? There's o
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 12:11:21PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> This would mean that you could throw away NestInset()->editing() because the
> InsetFormula would already know this.
>
> What do you think?
Well. I think "What happens to the other places that use editing() if I
throw it away". e
On Friday 02 August 2002 1:01 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> BTW, you should use add {} around the #1:
> \newcommand{\Vector}[1]{\boldsymbol{#1}}
I'm LaTeX-ignorant. Why?
A
On Friday 02 August 2002 12:50 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:13:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > How should I loop over all insets? Do I:
> >
> > 1. Loop from outside
> > for (; it != end; ++it) {
> > (*it)->addPreview(ploader);
> > // add some
On Friday 02 August 2002 12:11 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I was asking whether there is some function in th LyX insets that gets
> > calleds when ever the LyX inset is losing focus (i.e. some equivalent to
> > math inset's 'notifyCursorLeave'). In this case we could just destroy
> > the math cu
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 05:30:38PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Latest cvs. I have a macro Vector defined as:
>
> \begin_inset FormulaMacro
> \newcommand{\Vector}[1]{\boldsymbol #1}
> {#1}
> \end_inset
BTW, you should use add {} around the #1:
\newcommand{\Vector}[1]{\boldsymbol{#1}}
On Friday 02 August 2002 12:11 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> This would mean that you could throw away NestInset()->editing() because
> the InsetFormula would already know this.
Ok, so this bit is a bad idea, but the rest holds.
One question:
aleem@pneumon:devel-> grep "editing()" src/mathed/*.h
s
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:13:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> How should I loop over all insets? Do I:
>
> 1. Loop from outside
> for (; it != end; ++it) {
> (*it)->addPreview(ploader);
> // add some sub-loop
> }
>
> 2. Overload addPreview in container
On Friday 02 August 2002 12:03 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 11:10:14AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Yes, I've looked at the code in editing().
> >
> > > On second thoughts, maybe the math cursor does not get destroyed if the
> > > inset is left...
> >
> > that would indeed
On Friday 02 August 2002 12:37 pm, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > Sorry about that. I'll fix and commit.
>
> Sorry for being thick.
>
> Could you explain when one would like to store the connection?
>
> Regards, Ed.
When you'd like to disconnect and connect to something else.
if (cp_.connected
> Sorry about that. I'll fix and commit.
Sorry for being thick.
Could you explain when one would like to store the connection?
Regards, Ed.
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 04:32:10PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 01 August 2002 16:24, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > I guess my question is: How does an ordinary user know when to invoke
> > lyx2lyx?
>
> It shouldn't, IMHO.
>
> > By ordinary user, I mean one who may not ev
On Friday 02 August 2002 12:27 pm, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > One question: why do you store cp_?
>
> because of this:
> > On Wednesday 31 July 2002 4:20 pm, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > > should I store a connection in ControlParagraph?
>
> On Wednesday 31 July 2002 16:50, Angus Leeming replied:
> > Yes.
> One question: why do you store cp_?
because of this:
> On Wednesday 31 July 2002 4:20 pm, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > should I store a connection in ControlParagraph?
>
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 16:50, Angus Leeming replied:
> Yes.
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 11:10:14AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Yes, I've looked at the code in editing().
>
> > On second thoughts, maybe the math cursor does not get destroyed if the
> > inset is left...
>
> that would indeed bugger it up ;-)
>
> > Is there some equivalent to the edit() that
On Friday 02 August 2002 11:10 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On second thoughts, maybe the math cursor does not get destroyed if the
> > inset is left...
All appears fine in this regard. I suspect I've messed up.
A
On Friday 02 August 2002 11:30 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:54:17AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > André,
> >
> > if I edit a mathed inset and then leave it, a new preview is not
> > generated because this is returning false:
>
> How did you leave the inset?
by pressing
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:54:17AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> André,
>
> if I edit a mathed inset and then leave it, a new preview is not generated
> because this is returning false:
How did you leave the inset?
> bool InsetFormula::PreviewImpl::previewWanted() const
> {
> return !pa
On Friday 02 August 2002 11:30 am, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Will this be applied?
One question: why do you store cp_? You don't reset it as far as I can see.
Why not just
ControlParagraph::ControlParagraph(LyXView & lv, Dialogs & d)
: ControlDialogBD(lv, d), pp_(0), ininset_(false)
-{}
+{
André,
if I edit a mathed inset and then leave it, a new preview is not generated
because this is returning false:
bool InsetFormula::PreviewImpl::previewWanted() const
{
return !parent().par_->asNestInset()->editing();
}
ie, the thing thinks its editing still. Have you changed anythin
Will this be applied?
Thanks, Ed.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: formparagraph
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 17:51:56 +0200
From: Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
something like this?
---
Index: Dial
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 11:30:35AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I think the most difficult solution is to define what we _want_ to
> happen.
_I_ want a change to some other layout retaining as much information as
possibly can be handled in the other layout.
So a style with \begin{proof}
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:09:05AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> I know that. What I tried to point out is that a problem is never
>> solved by exporting to an alien format and then back. The lyx
>> format is what de
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:09:05AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I know that. What I tried to point out is that a problem is never
> solved by exporting to an alien format and then back. The lyx format
> is what describes what LyX knows about. Going through tex to solve a
> problem which is
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 09:54:37AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And we have had a _lot_ of disussions on this one...
> We ended up deciding against it...
>
> One of the main reasons (for me) is: what might happen when the user
> edit the latex file manually... what about the metacomments n
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 12:17:08PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> + Buffer * buffer = bufferlist.newFile(filename, "");
>>
>> I thought that the second argument to newFile was a bool.
John> Buffer * BufferList::newFile(st
> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> That would be the easiest exercise:
David> \begin{figure} %LyX: collapse figure [...]
David> Just define a nice syntax for LyX metacomments.
I know that. What I tried to point out is that a problem is never
solved by exporting t
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 12:41:23PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> José> What about the present solution: #!/usr/bin/env python
>>
>> Ah. I did not notice it... Note that you should always add a space
>> after #!
John> Is
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 07:39:10PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
| > That would be the easiest exercise:
| >
| > \begin{figure}
| > %LyX: collapse figure
| > [...]
| >
| > Just define a nice syntax for LyX metacomments.
|
| Hm... why not. This is somet
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 08:15:51AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> -> the macro is gone
Should be fixed now.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
78 matches
Mail list logo
