On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 04:57:29PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> How hot is too hot?
You crazy lot ! Everyone knows that a temperature above 12 degrees C is
reason to strip down to no clothes and refuse to do any work in the hope
of gaining a "tan" !
Though I did manage to burn my nose at glastonbu
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 04:54:11PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> While I agree with the separate implementation you suggest I don't
> like the waste of screenspace experienced with KDE/Gnome/Mozilla
> because they are afraid of having two separate widgets share the same
> space -- especially when the
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 08:34:51AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> > >Actually doing this and testing it out is something for a rainy day
> >
> > Well then we will see it quite fast, I have heard some rumors about
> > the weather in England ;)
>
> Tell me
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 09:00:09AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> > I don't think they are visible at once. There is or the message bar or
> > the input buffer visible (well they have the same design so you won't
> > notice. But they use the same space. D
"Garst R. Reese" wrote:
>
> "R. Lahaye" wrote:
> >
> > I added ulem in the preamble.
> > No change, though :(.
> > This is with 1.3.0cvs.
> > Rob.
> >
> Shucks, guess it does not do it's magic with underbar. Did you check
> Herbert's help page? www.lyx.org/help
When underbar is used, why not let
"Garst R. Reese" wrote:
>
> "R. Lahaye" wrote:
> >
> > I added ulem in the preamble.
> > No change, though :(.
> > This is with 1.3.0cvs.
> > Rob.
> >
> Shucks, guess it does not do it's magic with underbar. Did you check
> Herbert's help page? www.lyx.org/help
Before I do that, a simple questio
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 08:34:51AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >Actually doing this and testing it out is something for a rainy day
>
> Well then we will see it quite fast, I have heard some rumors about
> the weather in England ;)
Tell me about it ! Though actually the last two days have bee
John Levon wrote:
> Actually doing this and testing it out is something for a rainy day
Well then we will see it quite fast, I have heard some rumors about
the weather in England ;)
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 07:08:28AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> If people want to do work on OS independence of course, they are more
> than welcome
I have no way of testing the results, and in fact I do not care too much...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security
On 14 Jul 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> On Friday 12 July 2002 4:07 am, John Levon wrote:
> >> What would people think of making this pref default to /off/
> >>
> >> (Remember it is really "additional exit confirmation" -
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 07:23:40AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > There are no X dependencies left. But there are still some OS
> > dependencies on things like fork()
>
> But the primary goal for 1.3 is still toolkit independence?
Yes, but we are actually there now - I can build a fully functi
I added ulem in the preamble.
No change, though :(.
This is with 1.3.0cvs.
Rob.
"Garst R. Reese" wrote:
>
> Try \usepackage{ulem}
> more info in archives
>
> "R. Lahaye" wrote:
> >
> > Underlined (underbarred) text stretches out beyond the right side of
> > the paper, without ever getting a ne
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:01:10AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I'd appreciate comments on this patch
Looks straight forward, doesn't it?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:28:52AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > Charming. How is GUI independence progressing? Any hope for, say,
> > gdk under Windows?
>
> There are no X dependencies left. But there are still some OS
> dependencies on things like fork()
But the primary goal for 1.3 is still
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 11:51:40PM +0200, Ruurd Reitsma wrote:
> It turns out that supplying a name wich contains 'Qt' gets rid of
> 'freeware'. So I guess I'm stuck with 'QtLyX'
Must the name begin with Qt or could that be anywhere?
If so, I'd prefer 'LyX (Qt)' or something similar.
Andre'
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:27:10PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> You shouldn't get so worked up about things John, especially on a
> Friday.
I defy you to prove that slur etc. etc.
john
--
"Be sure of this, O young ambition, all mortal greatness is but disease."
- Hermann Melville
Hi,
After a useful communication with Herbert on my problem
displaying xpm-files on the LyX canvas, we came to the
following conclusion:
I'm using a fairly recent version of ImageMagick (5.4.7).
This version's convert produces a color output line
" c opaque"
which causes a horrible quality
Hi,
Underlined (underbarred) text stretches out beyond the right side of
the paper, without ever getting a new line (see attachment).
I see this in 1.2.0 as well as in 1.3.0cvs.
Is this a bug in LyX, or in LaTeX?
Or is this some awkward feature?
Thanks,
Rob.
$ latex -version
TeX (Web2C 7.3.1
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 04:25:36PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > > remove file->new asks for name
> >
> > Goodbye little feature, you served us well all these years.
>
> I gave you a last chance to complain.
>
> \bind "C-n" "command-sequence buffer-new ;
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:07:01AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Charming. How is GUI independence progressing? Any hope for, say,
> gdk under Windows?
There are no X dependencies left. But there are still some OS
dependencies on things like fork()
regards
john
--
"Be sure of this, O young
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../../boost -isystem
/usr/X11R6/include -O2 -m486 -fno-strength-reduce -W -Wall -c
GraphicsImageXPM.C -Wp,-MD,.deps/GraphicsImageXPM.TPlo
GraphicsImageXPM.C: In function `static class boost::shared_ptr
grfx::ImageXPM::newImage()':
GraphicsIma
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 14 July 2002 1:13 am, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Could you adjust your local copy of prlyx.def (and, more importantly,
> > the scripts that evaluate its output) so that it will not finish the lines
> > with a period?
>
> > I'll probably commit
"Ruurd Reitsma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > It means that Trolltech believes that programmers who forget to supply a
> > > name for their program (?) are mostly inclined to write programs called
> > > 'freeware'.
> >
> > What a strange assumption.
> >
> > So how does one supply a name then?
Hello,
Here is an adapted version of the lyx-1.2.0-turkish.patch
that Mike posted. The main difference is that I created
a ascii_lowercase function because there are some occasions
where one wants to honor locale in case, and others when it
is unwanted.
I'd appreciate comments on this patch (and
> > It means that Trolltech believes that programmers who forget to supply a
> > name for their program (?) are mostly inclined to write programs called
> > 'freeware'.
>
> What a strange assumption.
>
> So how does one supply a name then?
>
It turns out that supplying a name wich contains 'Qt' ge
> > It means that Trolltech believes that programmers who forget to supply a
> > name for their program (?) are mostly inclined to write programs called
> > 'freeware'.
>
> What a strange assumption.
>
> So how does one supply a name then?
>
Well.I have to find out...
Ruurd
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 02:34:28AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> This is the corresponding gdb output and backtrace:
Fixed thanks.
john
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:22:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Ugh, how do I fix that ?
> >
> The same way as you fixed xformsImage.[Ch].
But I static_cast to xformsImage const &
I should make a shared subclass XGraphicsImage ?
john
--
"Be sure of this, O young ambition, all mortal great
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:37:49PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Our dialog is not winning any awards. Check fdesign if you want to try
> it. FL_EXPORT void fl_add_fselector_appbutton
Nah... I won't meddle with dialogs...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
w
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 05:57:01PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > OK, next try... attached.
> >
> > 2002-07-15<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * counters.[Ch]: Fleshed out in preparation for taking over
> > counters functionality from text2. Compiles, untested.
> >
> > Martin
>
> This sh
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 07:32:32PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Shigeru Miyata) was using it IIRC. The last mail I found was from April
> this year so I'd think this is still interesting for some people.
I see.
> [Btw, the link to 'old archive' of lyx-devel is dead]
Has been for months and mo
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:31:09PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> I can't help but feel his time would be better spent elsewhere though
My time should be spend preparing a talk I am supposed to give... so I
guess you are right...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Secur
Hi,
This is the corresponding gdb output and backtrace:
$ gdb src/lyx
GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
T
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:07:05PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> "Home", "Documents" buttons? These are real and valuable extras.
Ah... indeed. So we need our own dialgoue here.
> The existing code is still extremely clunky, but it is possible to clean it
> up. I salute André for having a go!
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:22:38PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On a related topic, do we really support EMX still ? When was the last
> time someone built on OS/2 ?
Shigeru Miyata) was using it IIRC. The last mail I found was from April
this year so I'd think this is still interesting for some peo
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:07:05PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > (also why do we have our own filedialog instead of using xforms' ?)
>
> "Home", "Documents" buttons? These are real and valuable extras.
XForms has an API for adding these.
> The existing code is still extremely clunky, but it
On Monday 15 July 2002 6:22 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 07:10:46PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > This should not have visible effects but in some places I re-ordered
> > code, so please try whether this works for you.
>
> On a related topic, do we really support EMX still ? W
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 07:10:46PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> This should not have visible effects but in some places I re-ordered code,
> so please try whether this works for you.
On a related topic, do we really support EMX still ? When was the last
time someone built on OS/2 ?
(also why
On Monday 15 July 2002 5:57 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:12:01AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Martin> Attached the patch representing my work on the counters.[hC]
> > Martin> classes, with a vi
Small clean up attached. Removes (on my machine) unneeded #define and
#include and renames the member variables.
This should not have visible effects but in some places I re-ordered code,
so please try whether this works for you.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 05:13:06PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Personally, I'd prefer the Error (as it'll be rather hard to use the image
> file in a LaTeX run!) It'll also be easier to code as we'd just call
> GraphicsCacheItem::startLoading() and let it get on with it!
I think I prefer the
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:26:17PM +0200, Ruurd Reitsma wrote:
> It means that Trolltech believes that programmers who forget to supply a
> name for their program (?) are mostly inclined to write programs called
> 'freeware'.
What a strange assumption.
So how does one supply a name then?
Andre'
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:12:01AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> Attached the patch representing my work on the counters.[hC]
> Martin> classes, with a view to using them in short title insets.
>
> There is obviou
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:21:49PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> I plead great ignorance. how efficient is crc? Would there not
> Angus> be a big performance penalty if I used lyx::sum(file) every
> Angus> time I poled the file? (Every couple of seconds...)
>
> It is as efficient as
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 05:13:06PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Personally, I'd prefer the Error (as it'll be rather hard to use the image
> file in a LaTeX run!) It'll also be easier to code as we'd just call
> GraphicsCacheItem::startLoading() and let it get on with it!
Definitely, we shoul
On Monday 15 July 2002 5:21 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> I plead great ignorance. how efficient is crc? Would there not
> Angus> be a big performance penalty if I used lyx::sum(file) every
> Angus> time I poled the file? (E
"Andre Poenitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What's that 'freeware' thingy in the window title?
>
> I am not exactly sure that this reflects the situation properly...
It means that Trolltech believes that programmers who forget to supply a
na
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I plead great ignorance. how efficient is crc? Would there not
Angus> be a big performance penalty if I used lyx::sum(file) every
Angus> time I poled the file? (Every couple of seconds...)
It is as efficient as possible :) I know
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 04:44:49PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I recall that you suggested that it would be possible to also do away with
> the timer in the ForkedcallController, but I don't believe you elaborated.
I distinctly remember waving my hands !
Anyway we should be able to have a S
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 04:41:13PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> performance penalty if I used lyx::sum(file) every time I poled the file?
> (Every couple of seconds...)
Ugh. Polling is crazy. We should just re-check after opening graphics
dialog (and/or have an update button).
No way is polli
On Monday 15 July 2002 4:43 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:50:20PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > It'd be nice to move the spellchecker's interaction with the forked
> > process into Forkedcall. This will need an extension to Forkedcall so
> > that we can interact with a forke
On Monday 15 July 2002 4:45 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> I thought I'd address the bug "LyX doesn't update the image on
> Angus> screen if I update the external graphics file".
>
> Angus> I envisage something as simple as (
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 04:17:35PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> If you feel like re-working the code, go ahead. I have no strong opinions
> either way.
Hmm, you won't be tricked into doing my dirty work, will you ?
:)
john
--
"Be sure of this, O young ambition, all mortal greatness is but
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I thought I'd address the bug "LyX doesn't update the image on
Angus> screen if I update the external graphics file".
Angus> I envisage something as simple as (below) but don't know how to
Angus> check the timestamp of a file. I d
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:50:20PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> It'd be nice to move the spellchecker's interaction with the forked process
> into Forkedcall. This will need an extension to Forkedcall so that we can
> interact with a forked process, not just receive notification that it has
>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 04:39:58PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 02:03:02PM +0200, Ruurd A. Reitsma wrote:
> > http://www.xs4all.nl/~ps28/ruurd/lyx_win32.png
What's that 'freeware' thingy in the window title?
I am not exactly sure that this reflects the situation properly...
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 04:18:28PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I envisage something as simple as (below) but don't know how to check the
> timestamp of a file. I don't suppose piping `ls -l file` through sed is the
> way forward!
man 2 stat
?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 02:03:02PM +0200, Ruurd A. Reitsma wrote:
> just to show you all that I'm quite content with the Qt2 frontend nearing
> completion, here's a screenshot of 1.3.0 cvs on win32:
>
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~ps28/ruurd/lyx_win32.png
That's SO cool !
Excellent stuff !!
john
-
I thought I'd address the bug "LyX doesn't update the image on screen if I
update the external graphics file".
I envisage something as simple as (below) but don't know how to check the
timestamp of a file. I don't suppose piping `ls -l file` through sed is the
way forward!
Can anybody help?
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 12:32:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> What is the intended use of this ? Can I remove it (one of the
> John> best ways of supporting something in GUII is to remove it
> John> entirely :)
>
> It allows to select the style in combox by hand. Try M-p space.
On Monday 15 July 2002 4:35 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 09:46:46AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > Another thing: how hard would it be to try and load an image via the
> > > toolkit converter /before/ doing any conversion stuff, to see if it
> > > succeeds ? Only if it fails
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 09:46:46AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Why would you want to do that? The loader tells us what formats it can load
> directly. Why not trust it?
Also, the formats list is not fine-grained enough. What if Qt can't load
some weird pnm format, but lyx could convert it ? W
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 09:46:46AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Another thing: how hard would it be to try and load an image via the
> > toolkit converter /before/ doing any conversion stuff, to see if it
> > succeeds ? Only if it fails would it then need to try converting an
> > image
>
> Wh
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 09:00:09AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> I don't think they are visible at once. There is or the message bar or
> the input buffer visible (well they have the same design so you won't
> notice. But they use the same space. Do you say you want to make that
> part higher and
On Monday 15 July 2002 3:36 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> To the extend where the "algorithm solution" does neither create carpal
> symdrome when writing
a sore wrist!
> nor headaches when reading?
> I'd personally use the hand-written loop unless the function object gets
> reused in two or three
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:43:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> How seriously do we take Scott Meyer's recommendation "Prefer algorithm calls
> to hand-written loops"? (Item 43 of Effective STL)
To the extend where the "algorithm solution" does neither create carpal
symdrome when writing nor he
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:36:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> OK, I was waiting for feedback on the patch. If Dekel says it works,
> I'll apply it. What about a changelog entry, or at least a description
> of what it does (for my bugfix list)?
The 1.2.0 math parser was dropping pairs of
On Monday 15 July 2002 1:40 pm, Ruurd A. Reitsma wrote:
> > > TODO:
> > > -make a proper win32 fork controller
> > The forked controller is only really used by the graphics code at the
> > moment.
> The spellchecker also seems to use fork(); if it's only those two parts of
> lyx, another solutio
How seriously do we take Scott Meyer's recommendation "Prefer algorithm calls
to hand-written loops"? (Item 43 of Effective STL)
For example, these two functions have identical functionality. Which one is
prefereable? (and yes, I chose a deliberately simple example...)
Angus
void func1(Buffer
> >
> > TODO:
> > -make a proper win32 fork controller
>
> The forked controller is only really used by the graphics code at the
moment.
> In turn, conversion to a loadable format is controlled through a
> LyX-generated shell script. Presumably this will also have to be replaced
by
> some sort of
On Monday 15 July 2002 1:03 pm, Ruurd A. Reitsma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just to show you all that I'm quite content with the Qt2 frontend nearing
> completion, here's a screenshot of 1.3.0 cvs on win32:
>
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~ps28/ruurd/lyx_win32.png
>
> It has been built using qt 2.3.0 non-commercia
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> OK, I was waiting for feedback on the patch. If Dekel says it
>> works, I'll apply it. What about a changelog entry, or at least a
>> description of what it does (for my bugfix list)?
Dekel> I already said that the patch works.
That's
Hi,
just to show you all that I'm quite content with the Qt2 frontend nearing
completion, here's a screenshot of 1.3.0 cvs on win32:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~ps28/ruurd/lyx_win32.png
It has been built using qt 2.3.0 non-commercial for windows, M$ Visual
Studio, the intel 6.0 compiler and stlport.
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> John Levon wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 12:56:33AM +0100, Jan Warnking wrote:
>>> Basically, when using the "get Latex size" button in the graphics
>>> dialog, a custom Latex Size of 90 % of text height gets converted
>>> t
On Monday 15 July 2002 12:55 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> How come the 'spellchecker options' button has not been removed
> >> yet? I thought this had been discussed already.
> John> Has it ? Can you summarise ?
> I could not find I reference on that, but I thought we said at some
> tim
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> How come the 'spellchecker options' button has not been removed
>> yet? I thought this had been discussed already.
John> Has it ? Can you summarise ?
I could not find I reference on that, but I thought we said at some
time that it was n
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:36:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:53:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> >> [example]
>
> Andre> Ah... The patch has not yet been applied to 1.2.1cvs!
>
> Andre> So
> "Soeren" == Soeren Pietsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Soeren> This time with the patch ;) Soeren
Excellent. I applied it to trunk and 1.2.x branch
JMarc
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:53:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>> [example]
Andre> Ah... The patch has not yet been applied to 1.2.1cvs!
Andre> So it works for me but not for you.
OK, I was waiting for feedback on the patch. If Dek
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:24:26PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Dekel Tsur wrote:
> >For RTL I need to have a distinction between FINISHED_LEFT/RIGHT
> >and FINISHED_BEFORE/AFTER, so in other words, we will need to have
> >6 FINISHED* values.
>
> Why would you need this? IMO we just need LEFT/RI
Dekel Tsur wrote:
> For RTL I need to have a distinction between FINISHED_LEFT/RIGHT
> and FINISHED_BEFORE/AFTER, so in other words, we will need to have
> 6 FINISHED* values.
Why would you need this? IMO we just need LEFT/RIGHT (not BEFORE/AFTER)
IMO that left/right are in the same direction in
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 09:08:13AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> I would say because there are actions not given by a cursor movement
> which will have to move the cursor to the position. Maybe UP is not
> one of them but _before_ and _behind_ are needed so I think we should
> have all 4 direct
On Monday 15 July 2002 11:36 am, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > if (*iit->isInsetInInset(&inset))
> > return true;
>
> So this obviously should be:
>
> const int id = inset.id();
> ...
> if ((*iit)->getInsetFromID(id))
> return true;
Obviously ;-)
> Well I hope this wi
Juergen Vigna wrote:
> if (*iit->isInsetInInset(&inset))
> return true;
So this obviously should be:
const int id = inset.id();
...
if ((*iit)->getInsetFromID(id))
return true;
...
Well I hope this will work,
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Monday 15 July 2002 10:39 am, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
>>Angus Leeming wrote:
>>
>>>Is there a function
>>> bool insetContainsInset(Inset const & container, Inset const &
>>>containee);
>>>
>>>If so, what's it called !
>>
>>No there is no such function the one existant
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> What is the intended use of this ? Can I remove it (one of the
John> best ways of supporting something in GUII is to remove it
John> entirely :)
It allows to select the style in combox by hand. Try M-p space.
JMarc
Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> VPList::const_iterator vpit = vps.begin();
> VPList::const_iterator vpend = vps.end();
>
> for (; vpit != vpend; ++vpit) {
> Paragraph * par = vpit->par;
> Paragraph::inset_iterator iit = par->inset_iterator_begin();
>
On Monday 15 July 2002 10:39 am, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Is there a function
> > bool insetContainsInset(Inset const & container, Inset const &
> > containee);
> >
> > If so, what's it called !
>
> No there is no such function the one existant is:
> bool isInsetInI
On Monday 15 July 2002 10:39 am, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Is there a function
> > bool insetContainsInset(Inset const & container, Inset const &
> > containee);
> >
> > If so, what's it called !
>
> No there is no such function the one existant is:
> bool isInsetInI
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Is there a function
> bool insetContainsInset(Inset const & container, Inset const & containee);
>
> If so, what's it called !
No there is no such function the one existant is:
bool isInsetInInset(Inset *)
but you could just change the parameters to your needs o
On Friday 12 July 2002 5:05 pm, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > I'm using xforms-1.0rc4 with 1.2.x CVS
> > > I made the above changes in preferences for Postscript->PPM, and
> > > commented out the code in xformsGImage.C. No affect.
> >
> > Rubbish. Huge effect. You can now load
On Friday 12 July 2002 5:07 pm, John Levon wrote:
> Another thing: how hard would it be to try and load an image via the
> toolkit converter /before/ doing any conversion stuff, to see if it
> succeeds ? Only if it fails would it then need to try converting an
> image
Why would you want to do tha
On Sunday 14 July 2002 1:13 am, David Kastrup wrote:
> Could you adjust your local copy of prlyx.def (and, more importantly,
> the scripts that evaluate its output) so that it will not finish the lines
> with a period?
> I'll probably commit to CVS tomorrow, have to do a bit of testing
> before.
Is there a function
bool insetContainsInset(Inset const & container, Inset const & containee);
If so, what's it called !
I need it for my isInsetVisible function which now works perfectly for all
insets appearing in the main text. Thanks to Jürgen of course!
Angus
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> http://www.miwie.org/tex-refs/
John> It would be pretty easy to xslt this into context-sensitive help
John> files. This might be particularly useful for mathed. Something
John> to keep an eye on anyhoo
Using db2lyx, for example...
JM
95 matches
Mail list logo
