Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Juergen Vigna
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:32:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>What I mean is that there are AFAIK different design choices in normal >>and math insets. And then there is the problem of the quality of the >>existing implementations. These are two different things

Re: Removing the option "Ask for filename" on New Document

2002-07-08 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:15:07PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > > I think you are being pedantic and you think I don't understand... > > > > > b) because you state it is unimportant (see above) > > > > it is not worth losing sleep over, getting a migraine or

Re: bug in image-preview

2002-07-08 Thread Herbert Voss
David Kastrup wrote: > Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>there is still the bug present, that the right pixels >>are ignored. >> > > Are they in the ppm file? yes. a bug in LyX or in xforms Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Re: bug in image-preview

2002-07-08 Thread David Kastrup
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > there is still the bug present, that the right pixels > are ignored. Are they in the ppm file? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: preview - fontsize

2002-07-08 Thread Herbert Voss
Angus Leeming wrote: > > Interestingly (and this isn't your fault) the last equation is "cropped" at > the base. André, is it common to have to add non-zero numbers to the > ascenders/descenders to get things displayed? hm, I never saw this in my formulas. did you looked at the original pp-f

Re: preview - fontsize

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 07:11:13PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Works beautifully and I've applied it. > > Interestingly (and this isn't your fault) the last equation is "cropped" at > the base. André, is it common to have to add non-zero numbers to the > ascenders/descenders to get things di

bug in image-preview

2002-07-08 Thread Herbert Voss
there is still the bug present, that the right pixels are ignored. Angus, I do not really see, where the coordinates are passed to xforms? Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Re: preview - fontsize

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 5:52 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > the patch to get the default fontsize from the classfile if > the "default" was chosen from inside LyX. > > Herbert Works beautifully and I've applied it. Interestingly (and this isn't your fault) the last equation is "cropped" at the base.

CVS broken pointer with preview

2002-07-08 Thread Kornel Benko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- I like this math-preview with labels. But now Clicking inside a math opens a editable math-box. Then 1.) not predictable, part of the formula is selected. If I afterwards click with the laft-hand-mouse outside, then big part of text is selected. Someti

Re: preview - fontsize

2002-07-08 Thread Herbert Voss
Angus Leeming wrote: > Is this not cleaner (want to check it's still correct) a question of philosophy ... > > class PreviewLoader::Impl { > /// Per buffer, since different buffers have different class files. > double scale_to_fit_; > }; > > double PreviewLoader::Impl::scaleToFit

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread David Kastrup
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:41:00PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > \begin{preview} > > \begin{eqnarray} > > - -\frac{1}{2}(n-1)c\lambda \Delta R & & \label{4_1_3}\\ > > =\sum _{\alpha }\sum _{i(\alpha )_{j}\right)^{2} & - & \left(\lambda -(n-1)R\right)\

Re: preview - fontsize

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 6:28 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > On Monday 08 July 2002 6:21 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > >>Angus Leeming wrote: > >>>+ string const fontsize_(tmp.params.fontsize + "pt"); > >>>... > >>>+ ::preview_size_factor = 9.0 / strToDbl(fontsize_) ; > >

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread David Kastrup
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The really interesting quesion is why do things work when LaTeX is > run on the entire document but not when we're using preview.sty. Because of a bug fixed in the CVS. In a few days, I'll push 0.7.3. > David, are you reading this? I am afraid so.

Re: preview - fontsize

2002-07-08 Thread Herbert Voss
Angus Leeming wrote: > On Monday 08 July 2002 6:21 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > >>Angus Leeming wrote: >> >>>+ string const fontsize_(tmp.params.fontsize + "pt"); >>>... >>>+ ::preview_size_factor = 9.0 / strToDbl(fontsize_) ; >>>I don't think you mean this! >>> >>? >> > > My turn

Re: preview - fontsize

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 6:21 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > + string const fontsize_(tmp.params.fontsize + "pt"); > > ... > > + ::preview_size_factor = 9.0 / strToDbl(fontsize_) ; > > I don't think you mean this! > > ? My turn with the ? strToDbl(9pt) ?

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread David Kastrup
Kornel Benko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 08 July 2002 16:32, Angus Leeming wrote: > ... > > > l.1098 ...n-1)c\lambda \Delta R & & \label{4_1_3} > > ... > > Try modifying src/graphics/PreviewLoader.C > > Now it is ok. Of course, without labels. (Editing the lyx-file > and changing

Re: preview - fontsize

2002-07-08 Thread Herbert Voss
Angus Leeming wrote: > + string const fontsize_(tmp.params.fontsize + "pt"); > ... > + ::preview_size_factor = 9.0 / strToDbl(fontsize_) ; > I don't think you mean this! ? Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Re: preview - fontsize

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 5:52 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > the patch to get the default fontsize from the classfile if > the "default" was chosen from inside LyX. > > Herbert Errr... + string const fontsize_(tmp.params.fontsize + "pt"); ... + ::preview_size_factor = 9.0 / strToDbl(fontsize

Re: Generating previewed snippets yourselves...

2002-07-08 Thread David Kastrup
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:17:08PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > > > >I usually scroll to the bottom of the doc and continue working from there. > > > >So "usually" I'll see most things jsut once, but I'll see them. > > >

Re: mathed - compile

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
Fixed. Danke. Andr'e -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)

preview - fontsize

2002-07-08 Thread Herbert Voss
the patch to get the default fontsize from the classfile if the "default" was chosen from inside LyX. Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/ ? PreviewLoader.o.lock Index: ChangeLog === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/sr

mathed - compile

2002-07-08 Thread Herbert Voss
#include in math_casesinset.C Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:56:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> had until very recently with mathed: The "real" cut buffer gets > Andre> overwritten during this action. > > Yes, indeed. Moreover, what happens if you insert a label over a > selection? Where does the selection gets p

Re: Generating previewed snippets yourselves...

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 4:36 pm, Juergen Vigna wrote: > Ok. No we don't have a isVisible function right now and I don't think > this is easy to make as the "visibility" depends on the x,baseline > values passed as parameters to draw, which could change if I have to > rebreak the text after the load

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:41:55PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre> wrote: ... and the second problem is that neither of us knows Andre> both sides well. >> And do anyone know how other programs (kword, abiword, whatever) >> han

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:20:18PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre> wrote: Have we? I would believe in an open bug but not in a Andre> fix... I know that it annoyed me once and I could not find an Andre> immediate solution. Bug I

Re: Generating previewed snippets yourselves...

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 4:50 pm, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Why not have a preview toggle. There might even be events that > automagically toggle it, but there are times when I do a lot of > scrolling around looking for stuff that I forgot if I even wrote. A > simple way to toggle graphics and preview

Re: Generating previewed snippets yourselves...

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:50:57PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Why not have a preview toggle. The 'use preview option' could serve as such. The only missing thing would be a LFUN to allow key bindings... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:41:55PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> ... and the second problem is that neither of us knows both > Andre> sides well. > > And do anyone know how other programs (kword, abiword, whatever) > handle this? No. Do we really care? Andre' -- Those who desir

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:20:18PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> Have we? I would believe in an open bug but not in a fix... I > Andre> know that it annoyed me once and I could not find an immediate > Andre> solution. Bug ID? > > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93 Ok. This

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Kornel Benko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Monday 08 July 2002 17:40, Herbert Voss wrote: > ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/other/misc/underscore.s >ty Found already and used. This helped (as suggested in preamble) Thankst to you all. Kornel - -- Kornel Benko [EMAIL PRO

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:32:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre> wrote: >> What I mean is that there are AFAIK different design choices in >> normal and math insets. And then there is the problem of the >> quality of the exist

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Herbert Voss
Kornel Benko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > On Monday 08 July 2002 17:13, Angus Leeming wrote: > >>No! Put \usepackage{underscore} in your preamble. >> > > Thanks, now I have: > > ! LaTeX Error: File `underscore.sty' not found. > > Type X to quit or to proceed, > or enter

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:32:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > What I mean is that there are AFAIK different design choices in normal > and math insets. And then there is the problem of the quality of the > existing implementations. These are two different things, although > both are very

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Kornel Benko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Monday 08 July 2002 17:13, Angus Leeming wrote: > No! Put \usepackage{underscore} in your preamble. Thanks, now I have: ! LaTeX Error: File `underscore.sty' not found. Type X to quit or to proceed, or enter new name. (Default extension: sty) Enter file n

Re: Generating previewed snippets yourselves...

2002-07-08 Thread Juergen Vigna
Angus Leeming wrote: > We're talking about /exactly/ the same thing. Well I said I have the impression when I read your last post ;) > I /want/ to invoke startLoading() from within Inset::draw. > > I /do not want/ to do it without a little care. > > I envisage something like: > > Image::star

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Herbert Voss
Kornel Benko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > On Monday 08 July 2002 17:28, Herbert Voss wrote: > >>\usepackage{underscore} in your doc! not in the c-code. >> > > I only edited the produced .tex-file. So it should be what you meant, isn't that >correct? no, because underscore

[test] sorry, a last one

2002-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
It seems that Mate has finally fixed my attachment problem. So let's attach this darn bashrc again. JMarc .bashrc Description: Binary data

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Kornel Benko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Monday 08 July 2002 17:28, Herbert Voss wrote: > \usepackage{underscore} in your doc! not in the c-code. I only edited the produced .tex-file. So it should be what you meant, isn't that correct? Kornel - -- Kornel Benko [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGI

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:20:18PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> May I draw your attention to some late contributions to mathed > Andre> like the Mathematica backend or the preview implementation > Andre> which are not my work? > > I would rephrase it as 'there is only one architect

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> My thought is, the only good reason to chose math insets would be >> to prove that it is an inherently better architecture. And I am not >> qualified to comment on this. Angus> Jean-Marc, with all due respect, you're talking in circle

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 4:22 pm, Kornel Benko wrote: > On Monday 08 July 2002 17:19, Herbert Voss wrote: > > \usepackage{underscore} may help > > I have tried, but there was no improvement. > neither > \usepackage[active,delayed,dvips,tightpage,showlabels,underscore]{preview} > > nor >

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Herbert Voss
Kornel Benko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > On Monday 08 July 2002 17:19, Herbert Voss wrote: > >>\usepackage{underscore} may help >> > > I have tried, but there was no improvement. > neither > \usepackage[active,delayed,dvips,tightpage,showlabels,underscore]{preview} >

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Kornel Benko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Monday 08 July 2002 17:19, Herbert Voss wrote: > \usepackage{underscore} may help I have tried, but there was no improvement. neither \usepackage[active,delayed,dvips,tightpage,showlabels,underscore]{preview} nor \usepackage[active,delayed,d

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 4:20 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > The fact that math editor is now very > clean does not mean that it should be used as the base for the rest. > It only means that the rest should be cleaned up too. > My thought is, the only good reason to chose math insets would be to

Re: \cases

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 11:41:13AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > This doesn't seem to work very well in current CVS. The cursor jumps > about, the brace doesn't seem to expand (I assume control-return is how > to start a new case ??) ... Ok, I had a look. Everything work fine, but C-Return operates

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Herbert Voss
Kornel Benko wrote: > Now it is ok. Of course, without labels. (Editing the lyx-file > and changing "\label{4_1_3}" --> "\label{4\_1\_3}" cured it also.) > > Maybe (as Andre writes) because of underscores. \usepackage{underscore} may help Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> OK, so there is only one guy working on math insets, Andre> May I draw your attention to some late contributions to mathed Andre> like the Mathematica backend or the preview implementation Andre> which are not my work? I would rephr

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:59:33PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> Code (I). MathInsets re-use much more code. MathSymbolInset > Andre> (which handles all math symbols and lately even things like > Andre> \sin etc) is smaller than inset/insetspecialchar which handles > Andre> _six_ thi

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Kornel Benko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Monday 08 July 2002 16:46, Angus Leeming wrote: > To test that, run LaTeX on your entire file... This is the output with "showlabels" now: ... [243] [244] [245] [246] Overfull \hbox (7.97595pt too wide) in alignment at lines 1097--1101 [][][] [] [247] [248

Re: Generating previewed snippets yourselves...

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 4:02 pm, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > I don't think you're wrong. I'd just like to implement it so that the > > Inset does as little as possible. I think I see how we'd do this, but I > > need your help to turn it into working code. > > > > The plan > > === > > 1. Don't load

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:59:33PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> More features. Want something put under a sqrt? Mark it and > Andre> type the \sqrt short cut. And this works consistently with all > Andre> insets. Now try to move something from the main LyX text into > Andre> an ERT

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 3:57 pm, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Try modifying src/graphics/PreviewLoader.C > > Now it is ok. Of course, without labels. (Editing the lyx-file > and changing "\label{4_1_3}" --> "\label{4\_1\_3}" cured it also.) > > Maybe (as Andre writes) because of underscores. > >

Re: Generating previewed snippets yourselves...

2002-07-08 Thread Juergen Vigna
> I don't think you're wrong. I'd just like to implement it so that the Inset > does as little as possible. I think I see how we'd do this, but I need your > help to turn it into working code. > > The plan > === > 1. Don't load all image files once they are converted. > 2. insets ascertain

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Kornel Benko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Monday 08 July 2002 16:32, Angus Leeming wrote: ... > > l.1098 ...n-1)c\lambda \Delta R & & \label{4_1_3} ... > Try modifying src/graphics/PreviewLoader.C Now it is ok. Of course, without labels. (Editing the lyx-file and changing "\label{4_1_3}" --> "\l

Re: Tiny patch to autogen.sh

2002-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "adrien" == adrien rebollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: adrien> Time to wake up... Here it is. Applied. Thanks. JMarc

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> Well... maybe there are a few points more in the game. Andre> Code (I). MathInsets re-use much more code. MathSymbolInset Andre> (which handles all math symbols and lately even things like Andre> \sin etc) is smaller than inset/in

Re: Generating previewed snippets yourselves...

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:34:51PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Monday 08 July 2002 3:48 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > So,, Jürgen, what should I use for "inset->isVisible()". I have a Buffer > > > & at my disposal. > > > > Ah... good that you are not asking me. > > > > Andre' > > what happe

Re: Tiny patch to autogen.sh

2002-07-08 Thread adrien . rebollo
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:34:11PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "adrien" == adrien rebollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > adrien> Hello, I am having fun installing two different versions of > adrien> autoconf at the same time, and I noticed a small incoherence > adrien> in autogen.

Re: Generating previewed snippets yourselves...

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 3:48 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > So,, Jürgen, what should I use for "inset->isVisible()". I have a Buffer > > & at my disposal. > > Ah... good that you are not asking me. > > Andre' what happens if I s/Jürgen/Andre'/ in the above? Angus

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:41:00PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > \begin{preview} > \begin{eqnarray} > - -\frac{1}{2}(n-1)c\lambda \Delta R & & \label{4_1_3}\\ > =\sum _{\alpha }\sum _{i(\alpha )_{j}\right)^{2} & - & \left(\lambda -(n-1)R\right)\lambda ^{2}c+\sum >_{\alpha }\left\Vert B(\alpha )_{

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 3:41 pm, Kornel Benko wrote: > On Monday 08 July 2002 16:18, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Is the lyxpreview2ppm.sh up-to-date (I made some changes, one of which > > broke it.) > > It is always the newest. (Directly from source) > > > What happens if you run lyxpreview2ppm.sh dir

Re: Generating previewed snippets yourselves...

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:18:26PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > I don't think you're wrong. I'd just like to implement it so that the Inset > does as little as possible. I think I see how we'd do this, but I need your > help to turn it into working code. > > The plan > === > 1. Don't load

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:27:29PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > On Monday 08 July 2002 15:35, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Hi, > > > seems, the 'math_parinset.C' is missing. > > > > I just noticed that. Thanks for the Mail. Try again.

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Kornel Benko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Monday 08 July 2002 16:18, Angus Leeming wrote: > Is the lyxpreview2ppm.sh up-to-date (I made some changes, one of which > broke it.) It is always the newest. (Directly from source) > What happens if you run lyxpreview2ppm.sh directly on 0lyxpreview.tex? H

Re: Generating previewed snippets yourselves...

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 1:17 pm, Juergen Vigna wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > Could you two great minds think of ways of improving the interface to do > > what we'd like to do. The rest should be hidden inside the > > implementation. > > Well I cannot comment on your implementation (I don't have

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 3:27 pm, Kornel Benko wrote: > On Monday 08 July 2002 15:35, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Hi, > > > seems, the 'math_parinset.C' is missing. > > > > I just noticed that. Thanks for the Mail. Try again. > > Now i

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Kornel Benko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Monday 08 July 2002 15:35, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Hi, > > seems, the 'math_parinset.C' is missing. > > I just noticed that. Thanks for the Mail. Try again. Now it is compilable, but the previe

Re: preview

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 2:34 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > On Monday 08 July 2002 2:18 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > >>Since the look of formulas set with AMSLaTeX, for example, very much > >>depends on the interaction between formula size and page margins, > >>previews are most u

Re: newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Hi, > seems, the 'math_parinset.C' is missing. I just noticed that. Thanks for the Mail. Try again. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jeffe

Re: preview

2002-07-08 Thread Herbert Voss
Angus Leeming wrote: > On Monday 08 July 2002 2:18 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > >>Since the look of formulas set with AMSLaTeX, for example, very much >>depends on the interaction between formula size and page margins, >>previews are most useful when the preamble is mostly the same as for >>the no

newest CVS- cannot compile

2002-07-08 Thread Kornel Benko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hi, seems, the 'math_parinset.C' is missing. ... Making all in mathed make[3]: Entering directory `/home/kornel/rpm/BUILD/lyx-1.3.0cvs/src/mathed' make[3]: *** No rule to make target `math_parinset.C', needed by `math_parinset.lo'. Stop. make[3]: Leaving dire

Re: preview

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 2:18 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > Since the look of formulas set with AMSLaTeX, for example, very much > depends on the interaction between formula size and page margins, > previews are most useful when the preamble is mostly the same as for > the normal document. Instead of

Re: preview

2002-07-08 Thread Herbert Voss
Angus Leeming wrote: > os << "\\documentclass[10pt]{" << textclass << "}\n"; > > ? Would that not be easiest? you're right, in this way... but what with the other userdefined options which are now missing? some crazy but possible example: someone defines the use of amsmath in layout->docume

Re: preview

2002-07-08 Thread David Kastrup
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 08 July 2002 1:42 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:18:17PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > > >>Uh, I just mentioned scartcl and scrlettr as _examples_ with a > > >>different design size from the 1

Re: preview

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:50:47PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Alternatively, since this is for our own internal use, why don't we just > specify > > os << "\\documentclass[10pt]{" << textclass << "}\n"; > > ? Would that not be easiest? But that changes not just font scaling, does it? So we

Re: preview

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 1:42 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:18:17PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > >>Uh, I just mentioned scartcl and scrlettr as _examples_ with a > >>different design size from the 10pt from standard LaTeX classes. > >>IIRC, most of th

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Juergen Vigna
Edwin Leuven wrote: >>Maybe there are a lot of redraw events but the tabular won't >>draw anything if it is not necessary. > > > but as you said, selecting *is* very slow (much too slow I think, often I have > to wait for LyX!) When did I say that? I don't see it slow here. But it may depend o

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Juergen Vigna
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:03:22PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > >>I tried it with current cvs version (just now) and for me all >>seems perfectly sound. I tried to select all cells in every table >>in the file and I don't get any cpu usage (only while selecting), >>but the

Re: preview

2002-07-08 Thread Herbert Voss
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:18:17PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > >>Uh, I just mentioned scartcl and scrlettr as _examples_ with a >>different design size from the 10pt from standard LaTeX classes. >>IIRC, most of the Koma classes have 11pt as default (except for the >>lett

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Edwin Leuven
> Maybe there are a lot of redraw events but the tabular won't > draw anything if it is not necessary. but as you said, selecting *is* very slow (much too slow I think, often I have to wait for LyX!) Ed.

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:03:22PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > I tried it with current cvs version (just now) and for me all > seems perfectly sound. I tried to select all cells in every table > in the file and I don't get any cpu usage (only while selecting), > but the selection is so fast I ca

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Juergen Vigna
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > At the time when I tried to profile it I saw a number of redraw > operations of the whole table that were very unreasonable. Maybe is it > not relevant anymore. > > I just thought it was a good time to remind you about this one. Maybe there are a lot of redraw even

Re: Generating previewed snippets yourselves...

2002-07-08 Thread Juergen Vigna
Angus Leeming wrote: > Could you two great minds think of ways of improving the interface to do what > we'd like to do. The rest should be hidden inside the implementation. Well I cannot comment on your implementation (I don't have the time to look over it in detail), but I will give you a real

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> writes: >> Juergen> IMO tabulars a pretty fast right now, prove that for mathed Juergen> arrays ;) >> Did you ever see this message?

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Juergen Vigna
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:38:37PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>Juergen> IMO tabulars a pretty fast right now, prove that for mathed >>Juergen> arrays ;) >> >>Did you ever see this message? >>http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg35736.html > >

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Juergen Vigna
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>"Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Juergen> IMO tabulars a pretty fast right now, prove that for mathed > Juergen> arrays ;) > > Did you ever see this message? > http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg35736.html > >

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:38:37PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Juergen> IMO tabulars a pretty fast right now, prove that for mathed > Juergen> arrays ;) > > Did you ever see this message? > http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg35736.html Aehm.. I just wonder: How do I

Re: conversion script lyx format 2.1x -> 2.20

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:35:31PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > There is a script attached to bug 444 > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444 > > We do not know yet what to do with it... As a minimum it should be added to lib/scripts I think. Andre' -- Those who desire to give u

Porto changes

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
Do we have a chance of getting a list of what has not been applied from the Porto changes? I've just found another case (things missing from lib/symbols) Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)

Re: Inset unification

2002-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> IMO tabulars a pretty fast right now, prove that for mathed Juergen> arrays ;) Did you ever see this message? http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg35736.html There is an example file attached at http://www.m

Re: conversion script lyx format 2.1x -> 2.20

2002-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> I seem to remember some conversion script for lyx format 1.1x Andre> (which current reLyX produces) to 2.20 (which current LyX Andre> accepts). Has anybody seen this as weel? If so, where? There is a script attached to bug 444 htt

Re: Tiny patch to autogen.sh

2002-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "adrien" == adrien rebollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: adrien> Hello, I am having fun installing two different versions of adrien> autoconf at the same time, and I noticed a small incoherence adrien> in autogen.sh It should test if aclocal and autoheader are adrien> present using the variab

Re: preview

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:18:17PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Uh, I just mentioned scartcl and scrlettr as _examples_ with a > different design size from the 10pt from standard LaTeX classes. > IIRC, most of the Koma classes have 11pt as default (except for the > letter classes in it which have

Re: preview

2002-07-08 Thread David Kastrup
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 08 July 2002 12:07 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > > Angus Leeming wrote: > > > I think I'm going to be quite busy this week, so Herbert if you're > > > interested would you like to have a go? > > > > attached. > > > > > That is, for \documentclass{

Re: preview

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 12:07 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > I think I'm going to be quite busy this week, so Herbert if you're > > interested would you like to have a go? > > attached. > > > That is, for \documentclass{article}, divide by 10pt, for > > \documentclass{scrartcl},

Re: Generating previewed snippets yourselves...

2002-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 08 July 2002 11:34 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:29:46PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > >I do not want any preview code in the BufferView (nor in the Buffer, nor > > > in LyXText etc for that matter) And if that's not reason enough I'll > > > call my big brothers

Re: preview

2002-07-08 Thread Herbert Voss
Angus Leeming wrote: > I think I'm going to be quite busy this week, so Herbert if you're interested > would you like to have a go? attached. > That is, for \documentclass{article}, divide by 10pt, for > \documentclass{scrartcl}, divide by 11pt, for > \documentclass{scrlettr}, divide by 12pt

Re: Generating previewed snippets yourselves...

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:31:46PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > > LyX is a lousy text editor... typing 'G' certainly does not move to the end > > of the buffer. > > If Ctrl-End would not do the trick, it would be much saner to > implement that rather than promote Page Down as a substitute. It >

Re: \cases

2002-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 11:41:13AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > This doesn't seem to work very well in current CVS. The cursor jumps > about, the brace doesn't seem to expand (I assume control-return is how > to start a new case ??) ... I would have used 'M-m w i' (ro_w_ _i_nsert) but maybe the e

  1   2   >