On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:32:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > What I mean is that there are AFAIK different design choices in normal > and math insets. And then there is the problem of the quality of the > existing implementations. These are two different things, although > both are very important in practice.
The main problem is that both approaches are not really compatible. Of course, we have it working _somehow_, but the interface is far from nice... > Basically I see that Andre' says math insets are better, Juergen says > the opposite. They are the ones who know about it. ... and the second problem is that neither of us knows both sides well. > And then, why am I supposed to say sound things? Because usually nobody else does. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
