Re: OT: still spam/virus

2002-05-03 Thread Mate Wierdl
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 07:40:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Here is the plan now: > > > | 1) I will set up a filter that will filter out mail with certain > | file extensions. Do people send here .zip files? > > seldom... but with

Re: Fifth prerelease of LyX 1.2.0

2002-05-03 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 12:40:34AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > Ok, this will hopefully be the last (or next to last) prerelease > before 1.2.0 proper is released. > > Since pre4 several small problems have been fixed, and a few bigger > ones, but nothing major. > > There are still som

It created massive refugee flows and is a

2002-05-03 Thread feedback
<>

Fifth prerelease of LyX 1.2.0

2002-05-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Ok, this will hopefully be the last (or next to last) prerelease before 1.2.0 proper is released. Since pre4 several small problems have been fixed, and a few bigger ones, but nothing major. There are still some small glitches, but nothing really bad. (knock wood) This prelease can be found at

Xforms 0.9999 (again)

2002-05-03 Thread Jos Vos
Hi, Can anyone on this list summarize the steps to make Xforms 0. work with LyX? I've read the threads about fl_initialize (I have exactly the same problem) and the "4 April" thread, I tried some of the suggestions mentioned there, but for some reason I still don't seem to manage to get it w

Re: OT: still spam/virus

2002-05-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Here is the plan now: > | 1) I will set up a filter that will filter out mail with certain | file extensions. Do people send here .zip files? seldom... but with more windows users.. I don't know. | 2) I will set up two testlists: one with

OT: still spam/virus

2002-05-03 Thread Mate Wierdl
Here is the plan now: 1) I will set up a filter that will filter out mail with certain file extensions. Do people send here .zip files? 2) I will set up two testlists: one with TMDA, the other one with moderation (only nonsubscribers mail to be moderated). I cannot do this t

Re: [PATCH] Re: Conflict with endfloat

2002-05-03 Thread Dekel Tsur
lOn Fri, May 03, 2002 at 04:28:16PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | And the explanation (if I'm not mistaken) is as follows: > | The \begin{figure} causes TeX to go into restricted vertical mode, so > | the space after \begin{figure} is ignored. > | The space after the 'x' appears right befo

Re: Next pre and final 1.2.0?

2002-05-03 Thread John Levon
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 03:40:11PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > I just had a look at the bug list and don't see anything which should be fixed > for 1.2.0. The only incompatibility with 1.1.6 is still that we forget about the What about this Hungarian search thing ? Also: 1) Dekel's minpage s

Re: [PATCH] Re: Conflict with endfloat

2002-05-03 Thread Herbert Voss
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >>>There is no difference between the two! >>> > | And the explanation (if I'm not mistaken) is as follows: > | The \begin{figure} causes TeX to go into restricted vertical mode, so > | the space after \begin{figure} is ignored. > | The space after the 'x' appears right

Re: [PATCH] Re: Conflict with endfloat

2002-05-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 04:43:19PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: >> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 03:04:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> > The version with the '%'s is read by latex as: >> > >> > "Hello. >> > \begin{figure}x\end{figure} >> > Bar." >> > >>

Re: [PATCH] Re: Conflict with endfloat

2002-05-03 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 04:43:19PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 03:04:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > The version with the '%'s is read by latex as: > > > > "Hello. > > \begin{figure}x\end{figure} > > Bar." > > > > and the other is read as > > > > "Hello. > > \

Re: [PATCH] Re: Conflict with endfloat

2002-05-03 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 03:04:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > This is where you are wrong... > > The version with the '%'s is read by latex as: > > "Hello. > \begin{figure}x\end{figure} > Bar." > > and the other is read as > > "Hello. > \begin{figure} > x > \end{figure} > Bar." > >

Next pre and final 1.2.0?

2002-05-03 Thread Juergen Vigna
I just had a look at the bug list and don't see anything which should be fixed for 1.2.0. The only incompatibility with 1.1.6 is still that we forget about the paragrap-extra "indent" stuff (we loose this information). This is actually an added "left-indent" for the whole paragraph (not only the f

[PATCH] Re: Rotating images

2002-05-03 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 03 May 2002 2:09 pm, Wayan wrote: > On Fri, 3 May 2002, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Could you send an example file/image to the devel list please. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I think you are saying that the image is not rotated on the LyX screen > > but that it is in the output. (And that

bugs on LyX 1.2

2002-05-03 Thread Carlo Cecati
Hi guys, - I have installed LyX 1.2 (downloaded from the Mandrake cooker). - It looks very good but there are some big problems. It does seem that loading an old version file (e.g. from lyx.1.1.6) the spaces (blancks) in the \bibitem are erased. The result is a crash when one tries to edit the

Rotating images

2002-05-03 Thread Wayan
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Angus Leeming wrote: > Could you send an example file/image to the devel list please. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I think you are saying that the image is not rotated on the LyX screen but > that it is in the output. (And that the output then has this extra space). I put a scree

Re: [PATCH] Re: Conflict with endfloat

2002-05-03 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:32:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > No, the 1.2.0 behavior is wrong! Note that text in my example is > > "Hello. Hello." namely there is a space before the second 'H'. > > In the 1.2.0 output, there is no space between the sentences. > > > > The only pla

Re: [PATCH] Re: Conflict with endfloat

2002-05-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:37:19PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Does endfloat like this: >> >> Hello. >> \begin{figure}% >> x% >> \end{figure} >> Bar. > | Yes, but both % chars has no effect, so we can just write | Hello. | \begin{figure} | x | \

Re: [PATCH] Re: Conflict with endfloat

2002-05-03 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:37:19PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Does endfloat like this: > > Hello. > \begin{figure}% > x% > \end{figure} > Bar. Yes, but both % chars has no effect, so we can just write Hello. \begin{figure} x \end{figure} Bar.

Re: elsart and bibtex

2002-05-03 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:04:44AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > On 03-May-2002 Herbert Voss wrote: > > > why does this patch changes the file format? > > Oh sorry I didn't look at the patch, but I thought that implementing > stuff like frontmatter,backmatter would also change something in the

Re: [PATCH] Re: Conflict with endfloat

2002-05-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Suppose that I have a paragraph that contains the string "Foo.", a float, | and then string " Bar." The figure contains a single letter. > | The 1.1.6 output is | Hello. | \begin{figure} | x | \end{figure} | Bar. > | The 1.2.0 output is | Hello.\begin{fi

[Fwd: Feedback from www.lyx.org]

2002-05-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Could you please answer to carlo? It seems that some of these problems have been addressed already. JMarc Original Message Subject: Feedback from www.lyx.org Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 14:31:27 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] carlo cecati ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) en

Re: [PATCH] Re: Conflict with endfloat

2002-05-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Dekel Tsur wrote: >>Yes, but this is a case where 1.1.6 had a broken behaviour. Figure >>floats should not output anything at the point where they are >>inserted. Keeping output identical to 1.1.6 is not som holy grail. > > > No, the 1.2.0 behavior is wrong! Note that text in my example is > "He

Re: [PATCH] Re: Conflict with endfloat

2002-05-03 Thread Herbert Voss
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Dekel Tsur wrote: > Suppose that I have a paragraph that contains the string "Foo.", a float, > and then string " Bar." The figure contains a single letter. > > The 1.1.6 output is > Hello. > \begin{figure} > x > \end{figure} > Bar. > > The 1.2.0 output is > Hello.\begin{figu

Re: [PATCH] Re: Conflict with endfloat

2002-05-03 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:20:05PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Dekel Tsur wrote: > > The 1.2.0 format is bad bacuase: > > 1) It is not compatible with endfloat.sty > > Indeed. > > > 2) It is ugly when read by a human. > > Indeed. > > > 3) The DVI output is different than in 1.1.6: > >

Re: make distcheck broken

2002-05-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 10:19:23AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>"adrien" == adrien rebollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>adrien> On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 06:02:01PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >>adrien> wrote: >> OK, send the config.log (or the

Re: [PATCH] Re: Conflict with endfloat

2002-05-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Dekel Tsur wrote: > The 1.2.0 format is bad bacuase: > 1) It is not compatible with endfloat.sty Indeed. > 2) It is ugly when read by a human. Indeed. > 3) The DVI output is different than in 1.1.6: > In 1.1.6 the result is 'Hello. Hello.', while in 1.2.0 the result is > 'Hello.Hello'. > Once

Re: Placement of \usepackage{babel}

2002-05-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Juergen Vigna wrote: > On 03-May-2002 Dekel Tsur wrote: > > >>Which is even a bigger problem, since now the output of the document changes >>without a warning to the user! > > > Anyway I agree with Jean-Marc that the change IS needed and I don't think > we will go back to the old behaviour. Pe

Re: [PATCH] Re: Conflict with endfloat

2002-05-03 Thread Dekel Tsur
Suppose that I have a paragraph that contains the string "Foo.", a float, and then string " Bar." The figure contains a single letter. The 1.1.6 output is Hello. \begin{figure} x \end{figure} Bar. The 1.2.0 output is Hello.\begin{figure}% x\end{figure}% Bar. The 1.2.0 format is bad bacuase:

Re: Small fixes for docbook.

2002-05-03 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Thursday 02 May 2002 16:17, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > Ok, apply this. I am compiling now. I apply it then. > awfully late in the release process though. Some of those bugs were found after pre3 went out, and I have been extremely busy since. -- José Abílio

Re: Placement of \usepackage{babel}

2002-05-03 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 03-May-2002 Dekel Tsur wrote: > Which is even a bigger problem, since now the output of the document changes > without a warning to the user! Anyway I agree with Jean-Marc that the change IS needed and I don't think we will go back to the old behaviour. People editing the LaTeX preamble by h

Re: Placement of \usepackage{babel}

2002-05-03 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:48:00AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > I think I documented it un UPGRADING, but of course it should be in > > herbert's tips... > > We should also document that things like > > \AtBeginDocument{\renewcommand\contentsname{Contents}

Re: [PATCH] filetools.C

2002-05-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 12:13:47PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > ('you' here is _me_ not _you_) Indeed. I should have made it explicit by saying "Look as We are right". Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one

Re: [PATCH] filetools.C

2002-05-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Friday 03 May 2002 11:13 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> | On Friday 03 May 2002 7:09 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> >> > I think t

Re: Sun CC 6.0 Update 2

2002-05-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | make[3]: Entering directory `/home/witt/netsrc/lyx-1.2.0pre4/src/mathed' | source='math_arrayinset.C' object='math_arrayinset.lo' libtool=yes \ | depfile='.deps/math_arrayinset.Plo' tmpdepfile='.deps/math_arrayinset.TPlo' \ | depmode=none /bin/sh ../../c

Re: [PATCH] filetools.C

2002-05-03 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 03 May 2002 11:13 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | On Friday 03 May 2002 7:09 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > >> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> > I think that > >> > > >> >str.substr(0) == str > >

Re: [PATCH] filetools.C

2002-05-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Friday 03 May 2002 7:09 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: >> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> > I think that >> > >> >str.substr(0) == str >> >str.substr(0, ) == str >> > >> > easy to check though. >> >>

Sun CC 6.0 Update 2

2002-05-03 Thread Stephan Witt
Dear André, today I tried to compile lyx on Solaris with Sun's CC. I know that Lars doesn't like old and broken compilers, that's why I gave the newly installed version of Sun's CC a try. But I cannot decide if I got stuck because of a compiler (mis)feature or if it is another problem. Anyway, I

Re: Placement of \usepackage{babel}

2002-05-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I think I documented it un UPGRADING, but of course it should be in >> herbert's tips... Juergen> We should also document that things like Juergen> \AtBeginDocument{\renewcommand\contents

Re: [PATCH] filetools.C

2002-05-03 Thread Herbert Voss
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Angus Leeming wrote: > + if (lyxerr.level() & Debug::GRAPHICS) { > + string const print_str = (str.size() > 60) ? > + str.substr(0,60) : str; > + lyxerr << "Scanstring: " << print_str << en

Re: [PATCH] filetools.C

2002-05-03 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 03 May 2002 7:09 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > I think that > > > >str.substr(0) == str > >str.substr(0, ) == str > > > > easy to check though. > > 21.3.6.7 basic_string::substr[l

Re: elsart and bibtex

2002-05-03 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 03-May-2002 Herbert Voss wrote: > why does this patch changes the file format? Oh sorry I didn't look at the patch, but I thought that implementing stuff like frontmatter,backmatter would also change something in the fileformat (that you save some information in the .lyx file). If it isn't l

Re: elsart and bibtex

2002-05-03 Thread Herbert Voss
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > On 03-May-2002 Herbert Voss wrote: > > > don't know. > > here it comes > > Rob please head that when applying patches which change the fileformat of > a .lyx file you always risk that you can never read them again with a "real" > lyx. We may put the pa

Wow....

2002-05-03 Thread Rod Pinna
Just putting together an article, and I've been using 1.2.0pre4 for the last few days to give it a good run. I suddenly found that I could insert an Grace graph directly in, and have lyx do the conversion for me, both for viewing in lyx, and to eps. It was very impressive. Thanks alot for a ve