Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 03 May 2002 11:13 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | On Friday 03 May 2002 7:09 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> >> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> > I think that
>> >> >
>> >> > str.substr(0) == str
>> >> > str.substr(0, <number larger than leght of str>) == str
>> >> >
>> >> > easy to check though.
>> >>
>> >> 21.3.6.7 basic_string::substr [lib.string::substr]
>> >>
>> >> basic_string<charT,traits,Allocator>
>> >> substr(size_type pos = 0, size_type n = npos) const;
>> >>
>> >> Requires:
>> >> pos <= size()
>> >> Throws:
>> >> out_of_range if pos > size().
>> >> Effects:
>> >> Determines the effective length rlen of the string to copy as the
>> >> smaller of n and size() - pos.
>> >>
>> >> Looks as though you are right.
>>
>> ('you' here is _me_ not _you_)
>>
>> >> Andre'
>> |
>> | Lars, since it appears that I was correct about this,
>>
>> You mean: "since it appears that I was NOT correct"
>>
>> | here's the patch that
>> | will make Herbert happy and which is safe. May I commit it please?
>>
>> no.
>
| Ahaa. I should read things more closely. How about the original patch:
>
| lyxerr << "Scanstring: " << str.substr(0,60) << endl;
>
| Can I commit that?
yes.
--
Lgb
