Juergen Vigna wrote: > On 03-May-2002 Dekel Tsur wrote: > > >>Which is even a bigger problem, since now the output of the document changes >>without a warning to the user! > > > Anyway I agree with Jean-Marc that the change IS needed and I don't think > we will go back to the old behaviour. People editing the LaTeX preamble by > hand know what they do and therefore should also know how to counteract > (especially if it's described in UPGRADING). > > As Jean-Marc also specified you're a bit late to start this discussion right > now.
What I propose for next version (instead of this stupid 'assume that babel is before/after preamble thing) is to have proper per language preambles in addition to the general preamble. These would be magically activated by babel at language switch and do the right thing. Does this sound like a plan for 1.3.0? In the meantime, I let you (all) decide what to do for now. JMarc
