On Fri, 3 May 2002, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Suppose that I have a paragraph that contains the string "Foo.", a float,
> and then string " Bar." The figure contains a single letter.
>
> The 1.1.6 output is
> Hello.
> \begin{figure}
> x
> \end{figure}
> Bar.
>
> The 1.2.0 output is
> Hello.\begin{figure}%
> x\end{figure}%
> Bar.
>
> The 1.2.0 format is bad bacuase:
> 1) It is not compatible with endfloat.sty
right, but a problem of endfloat. Inside a float all is read
in verbatim mode and therefore endfloat needs a whole line
for \end{...}
> 2) It is ugly when read by a human.
yesss
> 3) The DVI output is different than in 1.1.6:
> In 1.1.6 the result is 'Hello. Hello.', while in 1.2.0 the result is
> 'Hello.Hello'.
in fact of the % the space before Bar is a whitespace
> Once again, we have an incompatibility with 1.1.6 files!
yes
> Therefore, I suggest using the 1.1.6 format again.
yes
Herbert
