Bug report: Literate build errors not showing up

2000-08-02 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
Hi everyone, Something has changed in the last few incarnations of lyx-1.1.6cvs. The Literate build errors no longer show up. Does anyone know why? -- Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids: Sylvan Associates, Inc.| Laura Isabella Sylvan | Ka

Re: Layout defaults for Hebrew document classes

2000-08-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lior" == Lior Silberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lior> Hmmm, I'm thoroughly confused: JMarc and Juergen have made Lior> (seemingly) contradictory statements on the possiblity of Lior> setting some docuement settings (especially the language, and Lior> the parskip where hebrew differs fr

Re: Layout defaults for Hebrew document classes

2000-08-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Lior Silberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hmmm, I'm thoroughly confused: JMarc and Juergen have made (seemingly) | contradictory statements on the possiblity of setting some docuement | settings (especially the language, and the parskip where hebrew differs | from english) within a layout file

Re: Layout defaults for Hebrew document classes

2000-08-02 Thread Lior Silberman
Hmmm, I'm thoroughly confused: JMarc and Juergen have made (seemingly) contradictory statements on the possiblity of setting some docuement settings (especially the language, and the parskip where hebrew differs from english) within a layout file: JMarc's version: > "Lior" == Lior Silberman

Feature Suggestion: Highlighting large blocks of text

2000-08-02 Thread Chris Eliasmith
Hi, I imagine this has been suggested already, but couldn't find the message. As great as LyX is, I find it annoying to move large blocks of text around. This is mainly because you have to drag the cursor over the entire text you want to select (i.e., you can't specify start and end points - to

Re: redundant files

2000-08-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > I don't have them in my checkout. | > | | Some problem with anon-cvs? Could be...no. the lofta are not there eiter. Lgb

Re: make problems with CVS

2000-08-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars> I really think cvs access is looming... Lars> (at least so that you can use cvs add and create patches that include Lars> the new files) This last makes sense. Tell me what I have to do. A

Re: redundant files

2000-08-02 Thread Angus Leeming
> > I don't have them in my checkout. > Some problem with anon-cvs? No I just tried again and got the relevant foo.h is not (any longer) pertinent. A.

Re: signals non-copyable

2000-08-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | For example (I have used InsetCitation here but this could be equally true of | InsetCommand if we placed the hide signal there). Note that I'm learning my | lesson about initialisation! | | Any comments? | Angus | | class InsetCitation : public Inset

Re: redundant files

2000-08-02 Thread Juergen Vigna
> > I don't have them in my checkout. > Some problem with anon-cvs? Jürgen -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._ Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450296 I-39100 Bozen

Re: signals non-copyable

2000-08-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars> | Lars, Lars> | I think I understand your reasoning behind removing the hide() Lars> | signal from the Lars> | Inset d-tor, but I also think that it's incorrect. We don't want the Lars> | signal to Lars> | be copyable. Lars> | Lars> Lars> In insetref.C you used this construct: Lars> Lar

Re: redundant files

2000-08-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I think that | | src/insets/insetloa.h | src/insets/insetlof.h | src/insets/insetlot.h | | are now redundant and should be removed as the .C files already | have. I don't have them in my checkout. Lgb

Re: signals non-copyable

2000-08-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars, | I think I understand your reasoning behind removing the hide() | signal from the | Inset d-tor, but I also think that it's incorrect. We don't want the | signal to | be copyable. | In insetref.C you used this construct: InsetCommand

Re: Edit->Table still under construction ?

2000-08-02 Thread Juergen Vigna
> > And this is my doing. I_thouught the xxx-inset-insert names were just > bad...so I_changed them. It is noted in the ChangeLog. > Oh well, good to know, I really was beginning to doubt my memory ;) Jürgen -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._ Dr. Jü

Re: Edit->Table still under construction ?

2000-08-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Juergen> On 02-Aug-2000 R. Lahaye wrote: | >> I've added tabular-inset-insert to my menu, but I can't use it | >> (greyed out). Is that because the action is not yet defined in |

Re: make problems with CVS

2000-08-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Allan> Try "make maintainer-clean" and a complete rebuild next time | Irrelevant, IMO | | Allan> make sure your patch includes a patch for Makefile.am. It is CVS HEAD | Allan> after all. It'd be nice to not break it with what should have been a | All

redundant files

2000-08-02 Thread Angus Leeming
I think that src/insets/insetloa.h src/insets/insetlof.h src/insets/insetlot.h are now redundant and should be removed as the .C files already have. A.

Re: make problems with CVS

2000-08-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I think my previous arguments that new dialogs should be worked on in a | separate branch until properly working are starting to prove correct. Actually, I disagree. It is allowed for the cvs to be incosistent and not compiling for sort periods of time. Wi

signals non-copyable

2000-08-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars, I think I understand your reasoning behind removing the hide() signal from the Inset d-tor, but I also think that it's incorrect. We don't want the signal to be copyable. This is what should happen, I think Each inset contains a hideSignal. One form contains a hideSlot. Click on an inset,

Re: Edit->Table still under construction ?

2000-08-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> On 02-Aug-2000 R. Lahaye wrote: >> I've added tabular-inset-insert to my menu, but I can't use it >> (greyed out). Is that because the action is not yet defined in >> src/LyXAction.C ? Juergen> No because there is no check fo

Re: make problems with CVS

2000-08-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Allan> Try "make maintainer-clean" and a complete rebuild next time Irrelevant, IMO Allan> make sure your patch includes a patch for Makefile.am. It is CVS HEAD Allan> after all. It'd be nice to not break it with what should have been a Allan> simple addition. Makefile.am WAS in the patch. I j

Re: Edit->Table still under construction ?

2000-08-02 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 02-Aug-2000 R. Lahaye wrote: > > I've added tabular-inset-insert to my menu, but I can't use it > (greyed out). > Is that because the action is not yet defined in src/LyXAction.C ? No because there is no check for this command in LyXFunc::getStatus()! Jürgen -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-.

Re: make problems with CVS

2000-08-02 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote: > > I think my previous arguments that new dialogs should be worked on in a > > separate branch until properly working are starting to prove correct. > But then no testing except by the person who thinks it works, but does > not know how to crash it:) No

Re: Edit->Table still under construction ?

2000-08-02 Thread R. Lahaye
Juergen Vigna wrote: > Nope! For a tabular-inset you have to call the command tabular-inset-insert > I've added tabular-inset-insert to my menu, but I can't use it (greyed out). Is that because the action is not yet defined in src/LyXAction.C ? Rob.

Re: make problems with CVS

2000-08-02 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Angus Leeming wrote: > Allan> > Fixed those so it at least compiles and links. Someone else will have to > Allan> > fix the crash when you open the TOC. I didn't try the other modified > Allan> > dialogs. Gotta do some thesis work now. > > I take it these compile/link erro

Re: make problems with CVS

2000-08-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Garst> > Allan> > Fixed those so it at least compiles and links. Someone else will have to Garst> > Allan> > fix the crash when you open the TOC. I didn't try the other modified Garst> > Allan> > dialogs. Gotta do some thesis work now. Garst> > I take it these compile/link errors were due to

Re: make problems with CVS

2000-08-02 Thread Juergen Vigna
> > Didn't get any thesis work done. Did other things instead and then took > another quick look to verify my hunch that Angus was still not > initializing all the variables (I'd seen this last week in FormCitation). > Sure enough dialog_ was never initialized. Hence we got lots of > segfaults.

Re: Edit->Table still under construction ?

2000-08-02 Thread Juergen Vigna
> > I don't understand; what do I create when creating a new table? > Isn't that the new insettabular? I still get all functions > greyed out when Edit->Table a new table? > Nope! For a tabular-inset you have to call the command tabular-inset-insert > I can't change more than one thing in Tabl

Re: make problems with CVS

2000-08-02 Thread Garst R. Reese
Angus Leeming wrote: > > Allan> > Fixed those so it at least compiles and links. Someone else will have to > Allan> > fix the crash when you open the TOC. I didn't try the other modified > Allan> > dialogs. Gotta do some thesis work now. > > I take it these compile/link errors were due to no

Re: make problems with CVS

2000-08-02 Thread Garst R. Reese
Allan Rae wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, R. Lahaye wrote: > > The make gets stuck with the recent CVS: > > (I'm compiling it against xforms 0.89) > > Fixed those so it at least compiles and links. Thanks > Someone else will have to fix the crash when you open the TOC. Confirmed. > I didn't try

Re: make problems with CVS

2000-08-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Allan> > Fixed those so it at least compiles and links. Someone else will have to Allan> > fix the crash when you open the TOC. I didn't try the other modified Allan> > dialogs. Gotta do some thesis work now. I take it these compile/link errors were due to no "make updatesrc" in src/frontends/

Re: XForms cleanup

2000-08-02 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Allan Rae wrote: > Angus, I also noticed some comments in the copied/modified files for > Citations etc. that need cleaning out. I haven't looked at your latest > patch so you may have done it already. There may be a few other > inconsistencies between our various files we s

Re: Edit->Table still under construction ?

2000-08-02 Thread Angus Leeming
> > > I've noticed with the last CVS that Edit->Table > > > shows the list of table functions. However, they > > > are *always* greyed out, even when I'm in a table. > > No but they ONLY work for the new insettabular! You'll also see > > a new item in the Layout-Menu appear magically as soon as y

Re: make problems with CVS

2000-08-02 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Allan Rae wrote: > On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, R. Lahaye wrote: > > The make gets stuck with the recent CVS: > > (I'm compiling it against xforms 0.89) > > Fixed those so it at least compiles and links. Someone else will have to > fix the crash when you open the TOC. I didn't try t

Re: Edit->Table still under construction ?

2000-08-02 Thread R. Lahaye
Juergen Vigna wrote: > > On 02-Aug-2000 R. Lahaye wrote: > > I've noticed with the last CVS that Edit->Table > > shows the list of table functions. However, they > > are *always* greyed out, even when I'm in a table. > > No but they ONLY work for the new insettabular! You'll also see > a new item

RE: Edit->Table still under construction ?

2000-08-02 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 02-Aug-2000 R. Lahaye wrote: > > I've noticed with the last CVS that Edit->Table > shows the list of table functions. However, they > are *always* greyed out, even when I'm in a table. > > Is this because the Edit->Table is not finished yet, > or is there a bug? No but they ONLY work for th