*Mate Wierdl writes:
| How about Icon? http://www.cs.arizona.edu/icon/index.htm
You mean: "Why not a scripting language nobody has hard of, then there
will be no language wars" :-)
I just mentioned Icon on an impulse: this is a TeX related list, and I
I first saw a reference for
*Amir Karger writes:
| I was planning on devoting some time to it next week. My guess is
| that the gearup will take long enough that I'll be able to get
| something in there. If not, it's obviously not essential to the
| release.
Ok, so concerning reLyX it is a go for release, but if you ge
This problem is mentioned from time to time. I'm not certain whether
it's been addressed yet. I'm using Lyx 1 pre 4. Here's a report in a
new context:
I just noticed that, upon checking documents in/out of RCS, figures
disappear, replaced by "infinite" gs-rendering. But (sigh) only some of
th
On Tue, Dec 08, 1998 at 03:09:58PM -0600, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
>
> > Another serious candidate is Perl, which is more widespread than Python,
> > but I fear the syntax of the language will scare people from trying to
> > use it.
>
>
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 12:31:19AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> How mature is this support now in the lates prerelease?
>
> Is there anything that is _badly_ needed before 1.0?
Well, I really wanted to put figure support into reLyX for 1.0. I feel like
reLyX is the last "major standard
hello iwould like to know if you could help me on some marks i found in a
old refridgerator these marks are dated 1922 the have a
Green Boarder around them they say Anleihe des deutfchen reichs
Schuldverfchreibung kibe buchftabeE 5000 Nr. 701931
funftaufend mark reichswahrung, dated at the bottom
*Mate Wierdl writes:
| How about Icon? http://www.cs.arizona.edu/icon/index.htm
You mean: "Why not a scripting language nobody has hard of, then there
will be no language wars" :-)
Seriously, no matter how nice icon may be (I have not looked at it) we
should chose something that is widely know
How mature is this support now in the lates prerelease?
Is there anything that is _badly_ needed before 1.0?
If not I'd like to gearup for the release.
Lgb
> My suggestion is that if you are going to add scripting support you do it in
> such a way that you can bind in any scripting lang easily, if this is
> possible.
> Then you can start off with some scripting language and if other really want
> scheme, python, perl or whatever support they can add
> Give me a LyX scripting language, and I'll redo the lgt :-)
Actually, the suggesting from Alejandro to use the LyX server is excellent for
this purpose!
You can get a primitive graphical tutorial going with this, without us having
to change a single line of code in LyX.
Check out the "develop
Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
> Are you sure it's enough stable? I can't run some not so old python
> programs because language version incompatibilities.
Python is stable in the sense that the basic programming language does not
change much. The libraries evolve however, and this can cause
i
How about Icon?
http://www.cs.arizona.edu/icon/index.htm
Mate
>On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
>
>> I vote for Python because it's easy to learn, has a natural syntax and
>> it's cross-platform.
>
>Are you sure it's enough stable? I can't run some not so old python
>programs because language version incompatibilities.
>
>> This is in contras
On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> I vote for Python because it's easy to learn, has a natural syntax and
> it's cross-platform.
Are you sure it's enough stable? I can't run some not so old python
programs because language version incompatibilities.
> This is in contrast with G
On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> Therefore, it struck me that it's relatively easy to patch LyX to do the
> demonstration by itself!
> [...]
> Sounds like science fiction?
>
> It's is, but not for ever. In particular, it's a piece of cake if we have a
> scripting language.
Giv
> > I would actually not include it with the distribution, but just make it
> > part of the Web pages. My original idea (I think) was to have something to
> > point skeptics (and other curious parties) to when they wanted to know
> > what LyX is really like without having to download and install i
*Richard E Hawkins Esq writes:
| this file is 644. Should it be something else??
Yes, probably.
Mine is 666.
Lgb
On Tue, Dec 08, 1998 at 09:13:42AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > - There were a few places where you put the lyx shot & the dvi shot on
> > separate lines. IMO, every time except the very first, they ought to go on
>
> Hmm, they are always supposed to be next to each other. Can you poi
On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
>
> *every* time I print something now, I get lots of messages like these:
>
> mktexpk: /var/spool/texmf/pk/ljfour/jknappen/ec/ectt1000.600pk already exists.
> /usr/lib/texmf/web2c/mktexupd: /var/spool/texmf/ls-R unwritable.
> [stuff deleted]
On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> A related solution might be to use a table to have the text and images
> on the same line, like
>
> text text text / \ / \
> text text text | LyX shot | | Xdvi shot |
> text text text \ / \ /
Yes, interest
On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, Amir Karger wrote:
> Minor Thoughts:
>
> - I think there could be a few fewer screenshots. For example, it's not a bad
True - I thought I'd dump everything first and see where people wanted to
cut back ...
> - There were a few places where you put the lyx shot & the dvi sho
*every* time I print something now, I get lots of messages like these:
mktexpk: /var/spool/texmf/pk/ljfour/jknappen/ec/ectt1000.600pk already exists.
/usr/lib/texmf/web2c/mktexupd: /var/spool/texmf/ls-R unwritable.
kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 600 --mag 1+0/600 --dpi 600 ecb
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> I like it!
Me too! ;)
Amir> Minor Thoughts:
[I stripped the ones I agree with]
Amir> - There were a few places where you put the lyx shot & the dvi
Amir> shot on separate lines. IMO, every time except the very first,
Amir> they ough
On Tue, Dec 08, 1998 at 07:32:18AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello everybody,
[Everbody: ] Hi, Mike.
(Hope the cold is better, since it's now served its purpose of getting you to
finish the lgt :)
> Lars has put my first whack at the "graphical tutorial" at
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub
Hello everybody,
Lars has put my first whack at the "graphical tutorial" at
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/lgt.tar.gz (thanks, Lars). Please have a
look and critique it, especially as to whether it succeeds as an
informative tutorial/evaluation tool. Don't worry about typos or extra
image files;
On Sat, 5 Dec 1998, John Weiss wrote:
> Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen writes:
>
> > > - Chapter 7 (the "Printing Tutorial") starts with telling the reader
> > >to read the Printing-HOWTO. I think, this is nonsense. If someone
> > >really read the HOWTO (and understood it), he would'nt want
26 matches
Mail list logo
