That's not good enough. Plus, we need something relatively stable for the time
being. Hence my PPA was created.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/m
Hence the big red warning message that was at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw/LXQt#Installing_LXQt_on_fresh_system
:D
Phill.
On 25 April 2016 at 18:36, Simon Quigley wrote:
> This was what I was trying to say,
>
> --
> Simon Quigley
> tsimo...@ubuntu.com
> tsimonq2 on Freenode
>
> --
> Lubuntu-
This was what I was trying to say,
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
I'll try to check this week. In the meantime, please try to apply this :
If people want stable LXQt, don't use the daily PPA, upgrade to Xenial and
use official repository. Most people should use this, and there is a LXQt
metapackage.
If people want dev version of LXQt (git snapshot), usr the dai
Well that is what the instructions are doing. Are you implying saying
basically, "tl;dr install the package and you are good"?
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.u
Perhaps it would be good to explain that this metapackage does in one step
what the directions proceeding do?
On Apr 24, 2016 21:48, "Simon Quigley" wrote:
> I've modified the wiki page[1] to state:
>
> "At this time, we are waiting for the LXQt metapackage to be included in
> the Ubuntu reposito
I've modified the wiki page[1] to state:
"At this time, we are waiting for the LXQt metapackage to be included in the
Ubuntu repositories. For now, use the ppa:tsimonq2/lxqt-meta PPA for an
up-to-date metapackage. The purpose of this PPA is to simplify installing the
packages required for LXQt.
Good point here. PPAs are, in general, to be considered unstable and
unsupported (read: risky). This is true with both of the PPAs we're
discussing.
Often times daily build PPAs track upstream changes which may create
problems. Because of this, they should not be recommended.
The reason using the
Greetings,
This was a simple issue on my part, that was easily solved. His PPA has a lot
more things to worry about. Also, my package is relatively stable. If you wish
to grab the source and take a look for yourself, go right ahead.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
-
I guess I missed a lot of the conversation when I replied earlier.
I was not aware of the process. I really though you were working of
Julien's Meta.
I know a lot of people(testers) have been using Julien's Meta for a
while and therefore when something breaks or is out of place it is
fixed very
Thank you Simon,
I do not have system to upgrade anymore so I won't have a chance to
test. But If I find some time I'll try to do a fresh install in a VM.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Simon Quigley wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I found out what the problem was and I have adjusted the wiki pag
On 04/24/16 15:19, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> Do you know what steps, if any, have been taken to resolve this in the
> daily PPA? If not, we should make that a priority to have fixed.
I honestly do not know. There are earlier versions, later versions, and in the
end, having a massive amount of pa
I'll leave it, as you do not understand what I'm saying... the lubuntu ppa
will be the one used by julien... So, we should be using that one for
testers.
But?... meh :D
Phill.
On 24 April 2016 at 21:27, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> Yeah the problem from the OP is the daily PPA. Simon's caus
Yeah the problem from the OP is the daily PPA. Simon's causes no such
problems. Thus, while you're thinking is not wrong, it's not relevant. If
anything, we should warn people not to use the daily PPA.
On Apr 24, 2016 1:22 PM, "Phill. Whiteside" wrote:
hi,
I do appreciate the keeness, but when
hi,
I do appreciate the keeness, but when faced with "it doesn't work" I ran
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw/LXQt#Installing_LXQt_on_fresh_system
and it worked. My reasoning is therefore that we should stick to a proven
working system that will, after all, be what Julien pushes forward for
adoptio
Do you know what steps, if any, have been taken to resolve this in the
daily PPA? If not, we should make that a priority to have fixed.
On Apr 24, 2016 13:17, "Simon Quigley" wrote:
> The Lubuntu PPA has the metapackage, but it has other packages that in my
> experience have caused conflicts. The
The Lubuntu PPA has the metapackage, but it has other packages that in my
experience have caused conflicts. The PPA is just a single, clean instance that
takes packages from Ubuntu.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ub
Afaik Simon's PPA was the only one with the metapackage, so it's still
relevant while we wait to get it in all the other places.
On Apr 24, 2016 13:08, "Phill. Whiteside" wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> in that case, would you revert the instructions back to using the lubuntu
> ppa which is more recognisa
Hi Simon,
in that case, would you revert the instructions back to using the lubuntu
ppa which is more recognisable than a single person's ppa
I followed
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw/LXQt#Installing_LXQt_on_fresh_system last
night (an earlier edition of the page) and it worked fine.
Regards.
P
Greetings,
I found out what the problem was and I have adjusted the wiki page.
The difference from the daily PPA and my PPA is that my PPA is *just* the
metapackage and the daily PPA has more than that.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Hello
Please, check the attached log.txt. There is log for Russian locale but it
is common dependency issue.
Also, I Installed the latest ubuntu and it works fine.
Thanks,
2016-04-23 17:05 GMT+03:00 Simon Quigley :
> Greetings,
>
> Do you have the exact dep errors and commands you ran? I would
@Simon .Thank you but like I said I found the issue. one or all of
these 3 were missing after installing the metapackage . libkf5screen6
and/or libkf5screen-dev and/or libkf5screen-bin.
As far as the command I ran they were simple copy and paste from the wiki page.
After that I started to trouble
Could you possibly translate that for us? Seems there's an error with
configuring pkgsel, though. Did you look into that?
On Apr 23, 2016 12:02, "Илья Куделин" wrote:
> Hello
>
> Please, check the attached log.txt. There is log for Russian locale but it
> is common dependency issue.
>
> Also, I I
Greetings,
Do you have the exact dep errors and commands you ran? I would be able to
assist if you had that.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai
So usually I use this repo to do my installs
https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-dev/+archive/ubuntu/lubuntu-daily
But as expected for a dev daily build it can break. So for more
comfort I went to the wiki :
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/LXQt
Witch has a nice easy to read howto . I upgraded to 16.0
Thanks to everyone for the help, it would seem that the root of my problem was
bad media and a failing optical drive. Swapping from the dvd drive to the cdrw
allowed me better access to booting and finding a ps2 keyboard (old mobo
wouldn't let me use USB until in the os) meant I could do a disc
26 matches
Mail list logo
