[Lubuntu-qa] [Bug 933726] Re: Firefox, incorrect language pack on PPC

I wonder if this could be even remotely related to bug 931191? I don't understand how language packs are selected/installed but we've also seen many reports on the forums of spell check errors, etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu- QA, which is subscribe

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] An upgrade bug

On 04/25/2013 08:14 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi Boss, > > Brian Murray altered me to a bug[1] that may affect upgrading 12.10 > --> 13.04. I've not seen a report on #lubuntu or by mailing list. > Brian has pulled in and set up a 12.10 lubuntu VM for further > investigation. since the initial re

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] An upgrade bug

On 04/25/2013 09:20 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi Erick, > > as you will see, this bug has been 'stood down' from a really > important bug on release day. We are always very alert of such things > when the releases go 'wild' to all the different computer systems. > > As long as we are aware of it

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] An upgrade bug

On 04/26/2013 09:30 AM, Erick Brunzell wrote: > It's not a Raring bug, so it was in no way a failure on our part as > QA testers. Just a quick follow up. That statement is possibly not entirely true. We can't be sure if it will effect Raring -> Saucy upgrades or not because t

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] make the i386 *buntu version check for UEFI

On 04/27/2013 03:31 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote: > sanderj@ubuntuforums suggests > > 'http://www.ubuntu.com/download/desktop indeed says "If you have a PC > with the Windows 8 logo or UEFI firmware, choose the 64-bit download.". > I would find it useful if the i386 Ubuntu version would check for UEFI, >

[Lubuntu-qa] Almost must have a 13.10 (Saucy) release

Just thinking about Julien's proposals here: https://lists.launchpad.net/lubuntu-qa/msg02271.html Please correct me if I'm mistaken but I think Ubuntu's nine month support cycle for Raring throws a wrench in the works as far as being able to skip a Saucy (13.10) release :^( Lubuntu 12.04 is supp

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] make new Lubuntu versions cooperate with Pentium M

On 04/28/2013 04:51 AM, Jackson Doak wrote: > since it's a kernel bug, does that mean all flavours will have the fix? > > What fix? This really is a kernel team thing. I beat my brains out on this some time ago: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/930447/comments/3 Not all of th

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] make new Lubuntu versions cooperate with Pentium M

On 04/28/2013 10:25 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote: > Hi Lance, > > Am I trying to swim in too deep water? > > And yes, I know that the non-pae kernel was re-activated for Lubuntu and > Xubuntu 12.04, but abandoned after 12.04. > > I was thinking this fix could keep the Pentium Ms running for a few more > y

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] An upgrade bug

On 04/26/2013 09:50 AM, Erick Brunzell wrote: > On 04/26/2013 09:30 AM, Erick Brunzell wrote: > > Just a quick follow up. That statement is possibly not entirely true. We > can't be sure if it will effect Raring -> Saucy upgrades or not because > they don't yet exis

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] An upgrade bug

On 04/28/2013 09:09 PM, Erick Brunzell wrote: > One more follow up, I stumbled onto this at the forums: > > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1859290 > > So it looks like this dates back at least as far as Oneiric and also > effects Xubuntu. Probably something we should t

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] make new Lubuntu versions cooperate with Pentium M

On 04/29/2013 01:18 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote: > Hello amjjawad and everybody else reading this mail, > > I think everybody can decide to run a linux version, that is not > supported or only partially supported with security updates. It probably > works well without any intruder stealing information or

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] make new Lubuntu versions cooperate with Pentium M

> Hi Lance > > I read a fair part of the comments of that bug, and I see why you think > a new bug would just be duplicate of that. > > But, do you encourage or discourage me to report this as a bug? In other > words, do you think it will make any difference? > > Best regards > Nio > I think you s

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] make new Lubuntu versions cooperate with Pentium M

On 04/29/2013 02:00 AM, Erick Brunzell wrote: > > > .. if you installed Ubuntu 12.04 and then installed > "lubuntu-core" how would that effect security, it only installs these > packages; > > elementary-icon-theme > galculator > giblib1 > gn

[Lubuntu-qa] Release-upgrader / Xsreensaver bug

I sort of got my wires crossed regarding release-upgrader bugs yesterday, but oh well ;^/ The bug I really meant to be following up on was: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lxadmin/+bug/966451 What I know so far is that this effects both Lubuntu and Xubuntu at least as far back as Oneiric. Now, I'm n

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Release-upgrader / Xsreensaver bug

On 04/29/2013 11:47 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi Erick, > > I did post up a link for a bug with 'slow machines' > onto https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RaringRingtail/ReleaseNotes/Lubuntu#Installation > > Does the wiki page it points to need more information? > > Thanks, > > Phill. > I think that looks g

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Release-upgrader / Xsreensaver bug

On 04/29/2013 03:16 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Erick, > > quite possibly. I am aware of setting up time-outs to be extended for > screen saver (I think that's the issue here), but no one has posted up > a work-around, which is important be on 'old machines' section. If > anyone has one and is not

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Release-upgrader / Xsreensaver bug

On 04/29/2013 04:46 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > My first suspicion, is that our upgade instructions were still trying > to pulling in dev version (-d etc). For that, I apologise and we will > not get caught again. > > @ Julien For the screensaver options that is one for the boss to check > up on.

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] [Lubuntu-wiki-docs] Off line manual

On 05/01/2013 05:50 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: > Hi, > > First of all, what is an offline manual? > Second of all, what is the difference between this and our Wiki Area? > > You all know how good I'm when it comes to Manuals and stuff but I > need to understand first what you guys are talking

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] [Lubuntu-wiki-docs] Off line manual

On 05/01/2013 06:35 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: > Hi, > > WAIT, are you really talking about something like > Menu > Accessories > Help ??? > Or > Press F1 and some Help Window will show up? > > WOW, if that is so, this is SO GREAT :D > > Give me a few days to try an Ubuntu install w/o internet

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha's

On 05/09/2013 12:36 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote: > 2013/5/9 Phill Whiteside : >> Hi Julien, >> >> I note that there is, once again, provision for alphas in the Saucy time >> line[1]. I don't feel that Cadence worked well for us last cycle, as it >> seems to concentrate on ubuntu / unity issues. Becau

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha's

On 05/10/2013 01:20 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi Erick, > > any particular reason for skipping some of the alpha's? > > Regards, > > Phill. > If the dates I posted are correct we'd have only two weeks between Alpha 2 and Alpha 3. Lance -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Qs and feedback

On 05/11/2013 04:13 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: > Hi, > > 1- When shall we start to vote for the default apps for Lubuntu 13.10? > I see both QA List and this list is quite silent these days regarding > that! > > 2- I'm not yet done, but this is what I got so > far: > http://amjjawad.blogspot.c

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Instructions for Lubuntu-fake-PAE at the wiki

On 05/11/2013 05:02 PM, Nio Wiklund wrote: > Hello, > > The instructions for Lubuntu-fake-PAE are at the wiki now. I have > converted the README files to new wiki pages and modified the original > wiki page to link to these pages. > > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu-fake-PAE > > Lubuntu-f

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Fwd: Re: Instructions for Lubuntu-fake-PAE at the wiki

On 05/11/2013 05:44 PM, Nio Wiklund wrote: > > > Original Message > Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Instructions for Lubuntu-fake-PAE at the wiki > Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 00:32:04 +0200 > From: Nio Wiklund > To: Erick Brunzell > > On 2013-05-12 00:18, Eri

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] [Bug #970758] Lubuntu Menu - same old problem, nothing changed

On 05/12/2013 05:15 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: > Hi, > > I've reported this so many times and have sent many times about it. > This time, I tried to be more professional and created a video to show > it to everyone just in case my words have failed somehow to explain > that :) > > Do not get me

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Instructions for Lubuntu-fake-PAE at the wiki

On 05/12/2013 05:50 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote: > Hello again, > > The instructions for Lubuntu-fake-PAE at the wiki are improved. > Text is added and changed. Screendump pictures are included. > > Best regards > Nio > -- > The instructions for Lubuntu-fake-PAE are at the wiki now. I have > converted th

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Fwd: Re: Instructions for Lubuntu-fake-PAE at the wiki

On 05/12/2013 12:14 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote: > > I see :-( > > Just a lazy question. How can I add a picture into a wiki page? (I saw > you have pictures.) > > And I will reconsider making a tutorial in the Ubuntu Forums. I guess it > would be possible to ask a moderator to unlock it, so that it will

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] About cadence schedule

On 05/13/2013 03:45 PM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: > Lance, I was away last week, sorry I didn't respond sooner. In short, > yes we'll do cadence weeks, and yes we'll stick with biweekly. They > should start about the same time as alpha 1, but there's no schedule > *yet*. Of course, discussion is alway

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] About cadence schedule

On 05/23/2013 02:10 PM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: > Lance your right on the 2 three-gaps in the schedule. The schedule was > really hard to keep the 2 week going with the odd scheduling of the > alpha's and freeze, etc. This was supposed to be changed by the > release team, but until/if it does I thin

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] [Suggestion] Having another version for Lubuntu (Mini Lubuntu)

On 06/02/2013 10:59 PM, Jonathan Marsden wrote: > On 06/02/2013 11:27 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > >> this is mentioned on our Minimal Install page. >> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation/MinimalInstall >> where > have 'desktop install' (the normal one), and 'core install' (ver

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] [Suggestion] Having another version for Lubuntu (Mini Lubuntu)

On 06/02/2013 12:54 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: > Hi, > > This is just a suggestion so don't shoot the messenger :) > > I'm aware that Lubuntu has already so many ISOs, more than any other > Ubuntu Flavor: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing/Why_So_Many_ISOs > > I understand what I'm suggest

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] [Suggestion] Having another version for Lubuntu (Mini Lubuntu)

On 06/03/2013 01:21 AM, Jonathan Marsden wrote: > On 06/02/2013 11:27 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > this is mentioned on our Minimal Install page. > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation/MinimalInstall > Interestingly, I just tried out installing (into a VM) from the Rarin

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Chromium vs Firefox : Need testimonies

On 06/04/2013 12:10 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote: > +1 for Firefox > I also prefer Firefox, but that's purely a matter of personal preference - not based any actual performance issues. Lance -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : ht

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] [Suggestion] Having another version for Lubuntu (Mini Lubuntu)

On 06/04/2013 01:49 AM, Jonathan Marsden wrote: > On 06/03/2013 10:50 PM, Erick Brunzell wrote: > >> On 06/03/2013 01:21 AM, Jonathan Marsden wrote: >>> Is there a reason the wiki page Phill referred to does not document >>> or even mention this possibility?

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] [Suggestion] Having another version for Lubuntu (Mini Lubuntu)

On 06/04/2013 04:27 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Lars Noodén wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Jonathan Marsden >> wrote:\ >>> OK. I don't have time tonight, but someone should do two Lubuntu "core" >>> installs using the Raring mini.iso, one using th

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] [Suggestion] Having another version for Lubuntu (Mini Lubuntu)

On 06/04/2013 02:35 PM, Jonathan Marsden wrote: > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013, at 01:23 AM, Erick Brunzell wrote: > >> #2: I hope wireless support improves in the netboot images to a point >> that we can drop the alternate images altogether. > Fine only where Internet bandwidth is ple

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] [Suggestion] Having another version for Lubuntu (Mini Lubuntu)

On 06/04/2013 03:35 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: > Dear Jonathan, > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Jonathan Marsden > mailto:jmars...@fastmail.fm>> wrote: > > Ali, > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013, at 02:17 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: > > > > > If data and numbers are what you are looking for,

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] [Suggestion] Having another version for Lubuntu (Mini Lubuntu)

On 06/04/2013 04:44 PM, Nio Wiklund wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > mörgæs has described old hardware, where Lubuntu is a good choice: which > CPUs, how much memory, which applications etc. See the opening post in > the following thread at the Ubuntu Forums: "Old hardware" > > http://ubuntuforums.or

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] [Suggestion] Having another version for Lubuntu (Mini Lubuntu)

On 06/04/2013 07:06 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: > > > Thank you, Lance, much appreciated. > > Obviously, our Devs don't find this idea interested or let's say, they > just can't go for it and reasons are very much understood and no need > to discuss any further. > > As I mentioned before. As lon

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] [Suggestion] Having another version for Lubuntu (Mini Lubuntu)

On 06/04/2013 01:59 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote: > 2013/6/3 Jonathan Marsden : >>> But, back to the 'lubuntu-core' vs 'lubuntu-desktop' issue, I'd >>> prefer that we take an approach similar to that of Edubuntu where >>> they offer additional installation options on the live images. After >>> the "pr

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] alpha testing

On 06/06/2013 12:04 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi testers, > > There has been several discussions which I have not sent each day to > this list about testing 13.10. But, it is now time to ask your > thoughts > > We found that cadence testing last cycle did not really help lubuntu, > as such I

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Lubuntu IRC Meetings

On 06/10/2013 09:27 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > +1 > Hi Phill. I was waiting for you to reply :^) I won't be there because IRC chat moves too fast for me, so I'm kind of neutral on the whole idea. I am curious though . can anyone point to anything that was actually accomplished by pa

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Lubuntu IRC Meetings

ribed to all of them there can be gaps on what > people know is going on / being planned. > > Regards, > > Phill. > > On 10 June 2013 17:01, Erick Brunzell <mailto:lbsol...@yahoo.com>> wrote: > > On 06/10/2013 09:27 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > > +1

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Lubuntu IRC Meetings

On 06/10/2013 02:18 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Julien Lavergne > wrote: > > 2013/6/10 Ali Linx (amjjawad) >: > > Hi, > > > > How about go back to the Lubuntu Meetings [1] as we used to

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Test Cycle

On 06/11/2013 04:47 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi Julien, > > From reading through the concerns of 'over testing', the schedule[1] > shows alpha 3 following on two weeks after alpha 2. If we drop alpha 2 > we get a more 'sane' testing schedule: > > June 20th Alpha1 > August 1st Alpha3 > August

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Test Cycle

On 06/11/2013 08:32 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi, > that teach me not to read the full email! > > All of the alphas and betas are 'opt in'. A flavour could start at > Release Canditate if they wanted. Julien is quite entitled to say that > he does not want to subscribe to any alpha / beta releas

[Lubuntu-qa] About 'gnome-disk-utility' as a default app

I've always wondered why we, or any OS, would include a potentially dangerous app in the "Accessories" column of a menu. IMHO Red Hats 'gnome-disk-utility' only adds risk so why do we even include it as a default app? In many ways it's comparable to Gparted which Ubuntu long ago decided to provide

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] About 'gnome-disk-utility' as a default app

On 06/18/2013 02:24 AM, Lars Noodén wrote: > On 06/18/2013 10:18 AM, Erick Brunzell wrote: >> I've always wondered why we, or any OS, would include a potentially >> dangerous app in the "Accessories" column of a menu. IMHO Red Hats >> 'gnome-disk-utility&

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] zRAM has been removed from Lubuntu 13.10 daily build of 17-Jun

On 06/18/2013 03:22 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: > Hi, > > I really don't like short answers without explanation :) > > I did NOT use a wrong ISO. If that so, blame the website, don't blame > the tester. I know you are not blaming, I'm just saying what happened: > > I have done this: > > 1- http:

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] About 'gnome-disk-utility' as a default app

On 06/18/2013 05:26 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote: > On 2013-06-18 09:18, Erick Brunzell wrote: >> I've always wondered why we, or any OS, would include a potentially >> dangerous app in the "Accessories" column of a menu. IMHO Red Hats >> 'gnome-disk-utility

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] zRAM has been removed from Lubuntu 13.10 daily build of 17-Jun

On 06/18/2013 10:25 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Erick Brunzell <mailto:lbsol...@yahoo.com>> wrote: > > > That's why I asked previously what method you're using to boot the > live > iso. > > > I hav

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] About 'gnome-disk-utility' as a default app

On 06/18/2013 02:03 PM, Jonathan Marsden wrote: > Wait.. Average end users are not logging in as root. Or running sudo > all the time. So how exactly is this a risk? Any time a user uses sudo > is "a bit risky for the average end user"! If you do not want them to > do that, don't give them an accou

[Lubuntu-qa] Proposed changes to Upgrade tests on the QA Tracker

When Ubuntu QA added the "Upgrade (image)" tests at my request we failed to include a download link for the current daily images, and the "Notice board" messages are improper on a couple of pages. There are two ways we could deal with this. For simplicity sake I'm mostly using links to Lubuntu i38

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] lubuntu-restricted-extras & Chromium Browser

On 06/24/2013 12:29 PM, Nio Wiklund wrote: > On 2013-06-24 19:26, Iberê Fernandes wrote: >> 2013/6/22 Ali Linx (amjjawad) > > >> >> Hi, >> >> sudo apt-get install lubuntu-restricted-extras >> >> will install Chromium Browser if executed. >> >> >> $ sudo ap

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 1 on the QA Tracker

On 06/24/2013 03:17 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi Lance, > > the cron job (auto-rebuild) of the lubuntu images has now been turned > off. The images on the tracker as of now can be considered as our A1's. > > Regards, > > Phill. > > On 24 June 2013 21:15, Nicholas Skaggs

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Last i386 test running

On 06/25/2013 04:56 AM, Lance wrote: > I'm running an upgrade test via release-upgrader now which should complete > the i386 tests. > > > I think we'll be OK with a few release notes for Alpha 1. > > Tomorrow I'll hit both upgrade tests for amd64 but I'd much appreciate it if > someone ran the o

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Bug 1190170 (No Shutdown)

On 06/26/2013 09:47 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi, > > The bug says that there is a fix, waiting to build. I'm just awaiting > confirmation from Juilen and will order a re-spin (again, desktop > only). Do not worry - we will take into account all the previous test > results and bugs when making t

[Lubuntu-qa] i386 alternate encryption

Encountered problems with i386 alternate encryption test, but it may be ME! I need to rinse-n-repeat to be sure what happened. ATM I'm not comfortable with giving it either a pass or fail. Sorry, Lance PS: It may very well be due to me being unfamiliar with the encryption test-case but I can't

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] i386 alternate encryption

On 06/27/2013 10:37 AM, Erick Brunzell wrote: > Encountered problems with i386 alternate encryption test, but it may be ME! > > I need to rinse-n-repeat to be sure what happened. > > ATM I'm not comfortable with giving it either a pass or fail. > > Sorry, > > Lance

[Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 1 upgrade tests

I wondered why the upgrade test results were deleted from the QA Tracker: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/297/builds It's sort of a bummer to spend hours performing tests and then see the results not published :^( Lance -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 1 upgrade tests

On 06/28/2013 02:19 AM, Erick Brunzell wrote: > I wondered why the upgrade test results were deleted from the QA Tracker: > > http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/297/builds > > It's sort of a bummer to spend hours performing tests and then see the > results not

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 1 upgrade tests

up (bug reports) do get looked into, this work > is never a waste of time. However, if you do find a bug on them, > please also copy the bug number to this list. > > Thanks for you continued testing, > > Phill. > > On 28 June 2013 08:55, Erick Brunzell <mailto:lbsol..

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 1 upgrade tests

On 06/28/2013 07:48 PM, Jonathan Marsden wrote: > On 06/28/2013 05:44 PM, Erick Brunzell wrote: > >> I think it's very possible but much testing is required :^) > Is the upgrade testing a suitable candidate for automation, so the "much > testing" doesn't need

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Fwd: Alpha 1 - Bugs List

On 06/29/2013 10:24 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: > Update: > > *Previously:* > /https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-power-manager/+bug/1193716 - > still happening - temp work around: I have increased the time to 50 > mins instead of never because when I choose never (turn monitor off)

[Lubuntu-qa] No restart notification after kernel upgrades

This is actually something I've noticed for a long time and ignored, but is anyone aware of an existing bug report? I truly believe at this point that Lubuntu is becoming a major player in the Linux world so I plan to do a lot of nit-picking, but I don't like to file wish-list bugs unless I know t

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Lxsession new options enabled by default approaching in Saucy

On 06/30/2013 05:34 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote: > Hi, > > I just push a switch in Lubuntu default settings, which will turn on > some features of lxsession. As it changes many aspect of the default > session, you will probably see some regression in the next daily > builds (probably in 1 or 2 days,

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Lxsession new options enabled by default approaching in Saucy

On 07/04/2013 01:25 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote: > 2013/7/2 Erick Brunzell : >> I notice that clicking on Logout now does nothing so the fun is >> beginning :^) > Ouch ! I was sure I fixed this one :-/ I'm downloading the daily, I'll > do the tests. Sorry to take so

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Video Problems - Saucy

On 07/12/2013 10:32 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: > > > *-pci:0 > description: PCI bridge > product: RS480 PCI Bridge > vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] > physical id: 1 > bus info: pci@:00:01.0 >

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 2 testing

On 07/22/2013 01:31 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi, > > the lubuntu Saucy Alpha 2's have > arrived http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/299/builds. > Please help test them. If you're new to testing then head over > to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Activities > The Lubuntu specific are

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 2 testing

On 07/22/2013 02:49 PM, Erick Brunzell wrote: > On 07/22/2013 01:31 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: >> Hi, >> >> the lubuntu Saucy Alpha 2's have >> arrived http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/299/builds. >> Please help test them. If you'r

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 2 testing

On 07/22/2013 04:18 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote: > Could you check the version of lightdm ? 1.7.5 seems broken, maybe > it's the cause. > > Regards, > Julien Lavergne > > I was able to reproduce this on a prior installation after applying todays updates: Start-Date: 2013-07-22 16:01:21 Commandline:

[Lubuntu-qa] Test suite problem

First of all I do NOT expect anyone to try and figure out why this isn't working before the release of our Alpha 2! But a large part of my i386 test suite is set up on this old hardware: VIA C7 CPU @ 1500MHz VIA CN700/P4M800 Pro/P4M800 CE/VN800 Graphics [S3 UniChrome Pro] (rev 01) VIA VT8233/A/82

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Test suite problem

ely limited disc space due to a network storage failure. When it rains it pours ;^/ Right now I wish I hadn't crammed my Intel hardware into such a small case because if it was still in a normal tower I could swap some drives very quickly. > > On 23 July 2013 23:39, Erick Brunzell &l

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Cadence Week 4 is here!

On 08/02/2013 04:12 PM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: > Week 4 is here, can you believe it? Starting August 3rd, it's time to > test images and packages again. Now, you'll notice something a little > different about the layout this time around. Thanks to your continued > feedback and ideas, we've tweaked

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] New test area.

On 08/03/2013 07:32 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi folks, > > A new area of the QA system is being > launched. http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/300/builds > > go have a look at the lubuntu area and report back! > > Regards, > > Phill. > > -- > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw > >

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] New test area.

On 08/04/2013 03:01 AM, Lars Noodén wrote: > On 08/04/2013 03:32 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> A new area of the QA system is being launched. >> http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/300/builds >> >> go have a look at the lubuntu area and report back! >> >> Regards, >>

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] New test area.

he Ubuntu Testcase > Admins is at your service to review and approve it:) > > Regards, > Howard Chan (smartboyhw) > Ubuntu QA tester > > 2013/8/4 Erick Brunzell : >> On 08/03/2013 07:32 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> A new area

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] New test area.

On 08/04/2013 03:31 AM, f...@schmidt-mail.eu wrote: > > Quoting Julien Lavergne : > >> 2013/8/4 Phill Whiteside : >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> A new area of the QA system is being launched. >>> http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/300/builds >>> >>> go have a look at the lubuntu area and rep

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] package test cases

On 08/16/2013 11:54 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi folks, > > there have been some more test cases added to the lubuntu desktop area > [1], please give them a run through and check that they behave as > expected. > > Regards, > > Phill. > 1. http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/300/b

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] package test cases

On 08/16/2013 05:05 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've added the abiword and gnumeric, along with a couple of others > that we also use. > > @Lance, I'll get in touch with knome (he who writes the xubuntu test > cases) and suggest you and he have a chat about extending the test > case(s

[Lubuntu-qa] About LXLE

I'm going to be fairly blunt here. I've read all of LXLE's announcements and they in no way violated the Canonical / Ubuntu COC but some members of our team did. (You know who you are) First of all LXLE never represented themselves as a sanctioned member of the Ubuntu family, remember when we wer

[Lubuntu-qa] Half of test suite still down due to Xorg bug

With Beta 1 testing approaching - maybe as soon as tomorrow - I wanted to let everyone know that I'm still unable to test as much as usual because of this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1205643 I have made a few changes so I can run some additional test-cases on my other

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Half of test suite still down due to Xorg bug

On 09/02/2013 02:56 AM, JM wrote: > On Mon, 02 Sep 2013 02:24:57 -0500 > Erick Brunzell wrote: > >> With Beta 1 testing approaching - maybe as soon as tomorrow - I wanted >> to let everyone know that I'm still unable to test as much as usual >>

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Half of test suite still down due to Xorg bug

On 09/02/2013 02:56 AM, JM wrote: > On Mon, 02 Sep 2013 02:24:57 -0500 > Erick Brunzell wrote: > >> With Beta 1 testing approaching - maybe as soon as tomorrow - I wanted >> to let everyone know that I'm still unable to test as much as usual >>

[Lubuntu-qa] First Beta 1 test images now available

Please remember that the images now available will quite likely be rebuilt a number of times, but the first Saucy Beta 1 testing images are beginning to appear on the QA Tracker: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/302/builds So it's time to strap on those testing shoes and prepare for

[Lubuntu-qa] Where is everyone?

Phill? -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Half of test suite still down due to Xorg bug

On 09/02/2013 02:00 PM, JM wrote: > On Mon, 02 Sep 2013 10:10:08 -0500 > Erick Brunzell wrote: > >> On 09/02/2013 02:56 AM, JM wrote: >>> On Mon, 02 Sep 2013 02:24:57 -0500 >>> however, Graphics are not related to DE, or to window managers, but depend >>&g

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Half of test suite still down due to Xorg bug

On 09/02/2013 02:00 PM, JM wrote: > On Mon, 02 Sep 2013 10:10:08 -0500 > Erick Brunzell wrote: > >> On 09/02/2013 02:56 AM, JM wrote: >>> On Mon, 02 Sep 2013 02:24:57 -0500 >>> however, Graphics are not related to DE, or to window managers, but depend >>&g

[Lubuntu-qa] No upgrade tests on the QA tracker

I have a plan, and I spent several hours setting this scenario up :^) Of course I can't be sure how it will work, and I had a major interruption last night because my sons motor home died .. yes, I used to be a mechanic. So it's sleep time now but I'd love to see some upgrade test

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] please help testing the alternate iso, amd64+mac & armhf+ac100

On 09/04/2013 12:35 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote: > Hi everybody, > > The desktop isos of Lubuntu Saucy beta 1 are tested rather well by now, > but the alternate isos are lagging behind. Please help testing the > alternate iso files, amd64+mac & armhf+ac100 :-) > > See this link > > http://iso.qa.ubuntu.c

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Bugs

On 09/21/2013 12:39 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi, > > can you please add any bug numbers > onto https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/IRC%20Meetings/Agenda so that we > can cover them and start to make the release notes up. We only have > one more meeting before 13.10 lands, at this point we need to l

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] The lastest builds do not boot live

On 12/04/2013 06:15 PM, Elbennit Turner wrote: > Hello Group, > > I updated the to the todays my test iso and now trusty i386 or amd64 will not > boot live in VirtualBox. I booted Saucy just fine to double check to make > sure it was not my system. Is anyone else experiencing this? Thanks!!! >

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Release Manager

On 12/26/2013 07:22 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi Good people, > > as you will have seen, there was no alpha 1 test for lubuntu. There > will be no alpha 2 etc. until you good people actually nominate some > one to take the role on. > > It's quite simple You decide on who will be a release m