[the new message is at the end]
Den 2015-03-03 13:13, Nio Wiklund skrev:
> Hi Walter,
>
> Lars and I are making progress with the test-cases for encryption :-)
>
> Best regards
> Nio
>
> Vidarebefordrat meddelande
> Ämne: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alternate testcase changes
> Datum: Tue
On 04.03.2015 14:50, Nio Wiklund wrote:
> Hi Walter, Lars, Phill and all other Lubuntu users
>
> I think we have a working alternative, that should be rather easy to
> implement for the Alternate Install (Encryption) test-cases (for the
> i386 as well as the amd64 iso files).
>
> @ Walter and Lar
Den 2015-03-04 14:38, Lars Noodén skrev:
> On 04.03.2015 14:50, Nio Wiklund wrote:
>> Hi Walter, Lars, Phill and all other Lubuntu users
>>
>> I think we have a working alternative, that should be rather easy to
>> implement for the Alternate Install (Encryption) test-cases (for the
>> i386 as well
I agree there's no reason to wait for desktop to implement the change to
alternate. I do, however want to emphasize that encryption is more
valuable to the average user than LVM. Maybe we should separate these
testcases for now? Then at some point in the future, we could create a
combined one. O
Hi again,
I want to add:
1. I really think we should have a test-case for 'Encrypted LVM'
2. I can think of situations, when 'Encrypted home' is a better
alternative. We can add such a test-case, if the Lubuntu users think it
is important.
As it is now, these two test-cases would be independent
I like the idea of being consistent with the rest of the Ubuntu family.
Does the standard encrypted LVM in ubiquity and Debian-installer (server)
work for us without any changes? If so, give me the numbers and I'll set
them up for us. No changes needed then!
@wxl
Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of
Hi Walter,
Encrypted LVM is *the* test-case in all other Ubuntu flavours including
Ubuntu server. I really think we should test it, not only LVM.
'Encrypted disk' is implemented via LVM.
Lubuntu is a special case with 'encrypted LVM', and inside it 'encrypted
home'. What I suggest is to remove 'e
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 08:57:41 -0800
Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> I'd say if Ubuntu in general considers it an edge case, it probably is.
>
> @wxl
> Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA
> Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact
> Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader
> On Mar 4, 2015 8:54 AM, "Nio Wiklund" wrote:
>
> > Hi
I'd say if Ubuntu in general considers it an edge case, it probably is.
@wxl
Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA
Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact
Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader
On Mar 4, 2015 8:54 AM, "Nio Wiklund" wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I want to add:
>
> 1. I really think we should have a test-case for
[replying at the end]
Den 2015-03-04 18:11, Brendan Perrine skrev:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 08:57:41 -0800
> Walter Lapchynski wrote:
>
>> I'd say if Ubuntu in general considers it an edge case, it probably is.
>>
>> @wxl
>> Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA
>> Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact
>> Ubuntu
Hi again,
I can reply at once. The *desktop* cases need some modifications:
1. Simple edits because of differences in the flavours.
2. zRAM must be switched off. This must be done outside of Ubiquity now.
The *server* case needs some edits too because of differences in the
flavours.
So there ar
I agree that the "install alongside" option can be replaced by manual
partitioning. That is of course it is a method that a beginner to Linux
would understand. However, the risk of overwriting something would be to
high. We should keep the first option and test it not that it works but for
areas th
On 04.03.2015 18:04, Nio Wiklund wrote:
...
> 2. What I suggested today does not imply any dropping to a shell.
> Without encrypted home the alternate test-cases will be smooth. But I'm
> waiting for someone (you, Lars?) to verify my test results.
I can try on real hardware tomorrow. I just tried
Hi everybody,
Continuing testing I found that cryptswap does not work even when it is
run alone in a 'use the whole disk' installation. This is a bad bug.
It seems to be an old bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecryptfs-utils/+bug/953875
I found what I think is this bug in a system
Hi Saqman,
What is your opinion about encrypted disk and encrypted home?
Best regards
Nio
Den 2015-03-04 19:33, Istimsak Abdulbasir skrev:
> I agree that the "install alongside" option can be replaced by manual
> partitioning. That is of course it is a method that a beginner to Linux
> would und
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Nio Wiklund
wrote:
Hi Saqman,
What is your opinion about encrypted disk and encrypted home?
Best regards
Nio
My opinion is that it is at the discretion of the user. As I
understand, the user has options. Which is a good thing. The home
directory would be of
Den 2015-03-04 21:40, istimsak skrev:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
>> Hi Saqman, What is your opinion about encrypted disk and encrypted
>> home? Best regards Nio
> My opinion is that it is at the discretion of the user. As I understand,
> the user has options. Which
17 matches
Mail list logo
