Hi again, I can reply at once. The *desktop* cases need some modifications:
1. Simple edits because of differences in the flavours. 2. zRAM must be switched off. This must be done outside of Ubiquity now. The *server* case needs some edits too because of differences in the flavours. So there are changes to be done. It would be confusing without any changes (at least for new iso-testers). Best regards Nio Den 2015-03-04 17:52, Walter Lapchynski skrev: > I like the idea of being consistent with the rest of the Ubuntu family. > Does the standard encrypted LVM in ubiquity and Debian-installer > (server) work for us without any changes? If so, give me the numbers and > I'll set them up for us. No changes needed then! > > @wxl > Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA > Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact > Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader > > On Mar 4, 2015 8:25 AM, "Nio Wiklund" <nio.wikl...@gmail.com > <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi Walter, > > Encrypted LVM is *the* test-case in all other Ubuntu flavours including > Ubuntu server. I really think we should test it, not only LVM. > 'Encrypted disk' is implemented via LVM. > > Lubuntu is a special case with 'encrypted LVM', and inside it 'encrypted > home'. What I suggest is to remove 'encrypted home' from the test-case. > > Best regards > Nio > > Den 2015-03-04 17:15, Walter Lapchynski skrev: > > I agree there's no reason to wait for desktop to implement the > change to > > alternate. I do, however want to emphasize that encryption is more > > valuable to the average user than LVM. Maybe we should separate these > > testcases for now? Then at some point in the future, we could create a > > combined one. Or is encrypted LVM a really unique case? > > > > @wxl > > Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA > > Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact > > Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader > > > > On Mar 4, 2015 8:05 AM, "Nio Wiklund" <nio.wikl...@gmail.com > <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com> > > <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com>>> wrote: > > > > Den 2015-03-04 14:38, Lars Noodén skrev: > > > On 04.03.2015 14:50, Nio Wiklund wrote: > > >> Hi Walter, Lars, Phill and all other Lubuntu users > > >> > > >> I think we have a working alternative, that should be > rather easy to > > >> implement for the Alternate Install (Encryption) test-cases > (for the > > >> i386 as well as the amd64 iso files). > > >> > > >> @ Walter and Lars: Can we agree to modify the (alternate) > test-cases? > > >> > > >> @ Lars: ... and when agreed, will you edit the alternate > test-cases? > > >> > > >> @ Walter and Lars: The next step will be to design > corresponding > > >> test-cases for the Lubuntu desktop iso files. > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I can try modifying the Alternate encryption case, if > someone can > > remind > > > me of the URL to the right guide to do that, when the time > comes. The > > > hard part is not the HTML but dealing with bazaar and then > > following the > > > right procedure for a pull. Would that be for 15.04 or for > 15.10? > > > > > > > > > > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-testcase/ubuntu-manual-tests/trunk/files/head:/testcases/image/ > > <http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-testcase/ubuntu-manual-tests/trunk/files/head:/testcases/image/> > > > > <http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-testcase/ubuntu-manual-tests/trunk/files/head:/testcases/image/> > > > > > > For 16.04, it would be best if the installers handled encryption > > > properly so that workarounds like dropping to the shell are > not needed > > > for full disk encryption. > > > > > >> ... > > >> @ everybody: > > >> > > >> Skipping 'encrypted home inside encrypted disk with LVM' > makes things > > >> much easier to get working. ... > > > > > > Encrypted home is probably important if there are multiple users > > or one > > > user with multiple roles on the machine. For the full hard disk > > > encryption I see a main use-case as being work laptops that > travel and > > > thus at risk of being lost or stolen. > > > > > > Regards, > > > /Lars > > > > > > > Hi Lars, > > > > 1. I hope we can agree very soon about the alternate encryption > > test-cases, and do it for 15.04, but I can fully understand, > that Walter > > or some other important persons may want to wait and think > twice before > > changing these test-cases. > > > > 2. What I suggested today does not imply any dropping to a shell. > > Without encrypted home the alternate test-cases will be > smooth. But I'm > > waiting for someone (you, Lars?) to verify my test results. > > > > 3. I agree that 'Encrypted home' is important if there are > multiple > > users or one user with multiple roles on the machine. But must > it be > > combined with encrypted disk and LVM? > > > > 4. I think creating the corresponding test-cases for the desktop > > installer needs more time, but modifying the alternate > test-cases need > > not wait for the desktop ones to be ready for publishing. > > > > Best regards > > Nio > > > -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
