I'd say if Ubuntu in general considers it an edge case, it probably is. @wxl Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader On Mar 4, 2015 8:54 AM, "Nio Wiklund" <nio.wikl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi again, > > I want to add: > > 1. I really think we should have a test-case for 'Encrypted LVM' > > 2. I can think of situations, when 'Encrypted home' is a better > alternative. We can add such a test-case, if the Lubuntu users think it > is important. > > As it is now, these two test-cases would be independent, because it does > no longer work with them in combination. If it is important, we can ask > the developers to fix the bug(s) so that the original alternate > test-case works again. > > Best regards > Nio > > Den 2015-03-04 17:24, Nio Wiklund skrev: > > Hi Walter, > > > > Encrypted LVM is *the* test-case in all other Ubuntu flavours including > > Ubuntu server. I really think we should test it, not only LVM. > > 'Encrypted disk' is implemented via LVM. > > > > Lubuntu is a special case with 'encrypted LVM', and inside it 'encrypted > > home'. What I suggest is to remove 'encrypted home' from the test-case. > > > > Best regards > > Nio > > > > Den 2015-03-04 17:15, Walter Lapchynski skrev: > >> I agree there's no reason to wait for desktop to implement the change to > >> alternate. I do, however want to emphasize that encryption is more > >> valuable to the average user than LVM. Maybe we should separate these > >> testcases for now? Then at some point in the future, we could create a > >> combined one. Or is encrypted LVM a really unique case? > >> > >> @wxl > >> Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA > >> Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact > >> Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader > >> > >> On Mar 4, 2015 8:05 AM, "Nio Wiklund" <nio.wikl...@gmail.com > >> <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> Den 2015-03-04 14:38, Lars Noodén skrev: > >> > On 04.03.2015 14:50, Nio Wiklund wrote: > >> >> Hi Walter, Lars, Phill and all other Lubuntu users > >> >> > >> >> I think we have a working alternative, that should be rather > easy to > >> >> implement for the Alternate Install (Encryption) test-cases (for > the > >> >> i386 as well as the amd64 iso files). > >> >> > >> >> @ Walter and Lars: Can we agree to modify the (alternate) > test-cases? > >> >> > >> >> @ Lars: ... and when agreed, will you edit the alternate > test-cases? > >> >> > >> >> @ Walter and Lars: The next step will be to design corresponding > >> >> test-cases for the Lubuntu desktop iso files. > >> > > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I can try modifying the Alternate encryption case, if someone can > >> remind > >> > me of the URL to the right guide to do that, when the time > comes. The > >> > hard part is not the HTML but dealing with bazaar and then > >> following the > >> > right procedure for a pull. Would that be for 15.04 or for 15.10? > >> > > >> > > >> > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-testcase/ubuntu-manual-tests/trunk/files/head:/testcases/image/ > >> < > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-testcase/ubuntu-manual-tests/trunk/files/head:/testcases/image/ > > > >> > > >> > For 16.04, it would be best if the installers handled encryption > >> > properly so that workarounds like dropping to the shell are not > needed > >> > for full disk encryption. > >> > > >> >> ... > >> >> @ everybody: > >> >> > >> >> Skipping 'encrypted home inside encrypted disk with LVM' makes > things > >> >> much easier to get working. ... > >> > > >> > Encrypted home is probably important if there are multiple users > >> or one > >> > user with multiple roles on the machine. For the full hard disk > >> > encryption I see a main use-case as being work laptops that > travel and > >> > thus at risk of being lost or stolen. > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > /Lars > >> > > >> > >> Hi Lars, > >> > >> 1. I hope we can agree very soon about the alternate encryption > >> test-cases, and do it for 15.04, but I can fully understand, that > Walter > >> or some other important persons may want to wait and think twice > before > >> changing these test-cases. > >> > >> 2. What I suggested today does not imply any dropping to a shell. > >> Without encrypted home the alternate test-cases will be smooth. But > I'm > >> waiting for someone (you, Lars?) to verify my test results. > >> > >> 3. I agree that 'Encrypted home' is important if there are multiple > >> users or one user with multiple roles on the machine. But must it be > >> combined with encrypted disk and LVM? > >> > >> 4. I think creating the corresponding test-cases for the desktop > >> installer needs more time, but modifying the alternate test-cases > need > >> not wait for the desktop ones to be ready for publishing. > >> > >> Best regards > >> Nio > >> > > > >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
