Hi again Bryan,
It works for me today with the current daily Lubuntu
vivid-desktop-i386.iso
when I run
sudo swapoff -a
before the installer is started. I have 'Encrypted disk with LVM' now :-)
Best regards
Nio
Den 2015-03-08 11:47, Bryan See skrev:
> Hey Nio
>
> Thanks a lot for the tips!
>
Hi Bryan,
I agree, that it would be better if this issue is resolved. The
work-around to swapoff the zRAM is not too difficult, but of course, the
zRAM should be tolerated during the installation.
sudo swapoff -a
See the attached very early suggestion to a testcase for the Lubuntu
desktop instal
Hi again,
This link at Arch Linux discusses different aspects of encryption in
computers, disk encryption and data encryption (with the special case
home encryption).
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/disk_encryption
My conclusion after reading that link is that 'Encrypted disk' is better
tha
Den 2015-03-04 21:40, istimsak skrev:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
>> Hi Saqman, What is your opinion about encrypted disk and encrypted
>> home? Best regards Nio
> My opinion is that it is at the discretion of the user. As I understand,
> the user has options. Which
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Nio Wiklund
wrote:
Hi Saqman,
What is your opinion about encrypted disk and encrypted home?
Best regards
Nio
My opinion is that it is at the discretion of the user. As I
understand, the user has options. Which is a good thing. The home
directory would be of
Hi Saqman,
What is your opinion about encrypted disk and encrypted home?
Best regards
Nio
Den 2015-03-04 19:33, Istimsak Abdulbasir skrev:
> I agree that the "install alongside" option can be replaced by manual
> partitioning. That is of course it is a method that a beginner to Linux
> would und
On 04.03.2015 18:04, Nio Wiklund wrote:
...
> 2. What I suggested today does not imply any dropping to a shell.
> Without encrypted home the alternate test-cases will be smooth. But I'm
> waiting for someone (you, Lars?) to verify my test results.
I can try on real hardware tomorrow. I just tried
I agree that the "install alongside" option can be replaced by manual
partitioning. That is of course it is a method that a beginner to Linux
would understand. However, the risk of overwriting something would be to
high. We should keep the first option and test it not that it works but for
areas th
[replying at the end]
Den 2015-03-04 18:11, Brendan Perrine skrev:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 08:57:41 -0800
> Walter Lapchynski wrote:
>
>> I'd say if Ubuntu in general considers it an edge case, it probably is.
>>
>> @wxl
>> Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA
>> Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact
>> Ubuntu
Hi again,
I can reply at once. The *desktop* cases need some modifications:
1. Simple edits because of differences in the flavours.
2. zRAM must be switched off. This must be done outside of Ubiquity now.
The *server* case needs some edits too because of differences in the
flavours.
So there ar
I'd say if Ubuntu in general considers it an edge case, it probably is.
@wxl
Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA
Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact
Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader
On Mar 4, 2015 8:54 AM, "Nio Wiklund" wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I want to add:
>
> 1. I really think we should have a test-case for
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 08:57:41 -0800
Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> I'd say if Ubuntu in general considers it an edge case, it probably is.
>
> @wxl
> Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA
> Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact
> Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader
> On Mar 4, 2015 8:54 AM, "Nio Wiklund" wrote:
>
> > Hi
Hi Walter,
Encrypted LVM is *the* test-case in all other Ubuntu flavours including
Ubuntu server. I really think we should test it, not only LVM.
'Encrypted disk' is implemented via LVM.
Lubuntu is a special case with 'encrypted LVM', and inside it 'encrypted
home'. What I suggest is to remove 'e
I like the idea of being consistent with the rest of the Ubuntu family.
Does the standard encrypted LVM in ubiquity and Debian-installer (server)
work for us without any changes? If so, give me the numbers and I'll set
them up for us. No changes needed then!
@wxl
Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of
Hi again,
I want to add:
1. I really think we should have a test-case for 'Encrypted LVM'
2. I can think of situations, when 'Encrypted home' is a better
alternative. We can add such a test-case, if the Lubuntu users think it
is important.
As it is now, these two test-cases would be independent
I agree there's no reason to wait for desktop to implement the change to
alternate. I do, however want to emphasize that encryption is more
valuable to the average user than LVM. Maybe we should separate these
testcases for now? Then at some point in the future, we could create a
combined one. O
Den 2015-03-04 14:38, Lars Noodén skrev:
> On 04.03.2015 14:50, Nio Wiklund wrote:
>> Hi Walter, Lars, Phill and all other Lubuntu users
>>
>> I think we have a working alternative, that should be rather easy to
>> implement for the Alternate Install (Encryption) test-cases (for the
>> i386 as well
On 04.03.2015 14:50, Nio Wiklund wrote:
> Hi Walter, Lars, Phill and all other Lubuntu users
>
> I think we have a working alternative, that should be rather easy to
> implement for the Alternate Install (Encryption) test-cases (for the
> i386 as well as the amd64 iso files).
>
> @ Walter and Lar
[the new message is at the end]
Den 2015-03-03 13:13, Nio Wiklund skrev:
> Hi Walter,
>
> Lars and I are making progress with the test-cases for encryption :-)
>
> Best regards
> Nio
>
> Vidarebefordrat meddelande
> Ämne: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alternate testcase changes
> Datum: Tue
19 matches
Mail list logo
