https://github.com/medismailben updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101934
>From b2061b3d60ceb43b8bbd57dd4fb56eacd834d644 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Med Ismail Bennani
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 00:45:54 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb/Interpreter] Fix ambiguous partial command resolu
https://github.com/labath commented:
We're pretty close, but I still some comments and question. None of them should
be major, I hope.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101272
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
https://github.com/labath edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101272
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -494,6 +528,23 @@ Stream::create(const Directory &StreamDesc, const
object::MinidumpFile &File) {
}
return std::make_unique(std::move(Ranges));
}
+ case StreamKind::Memory64List: {
+Error Err = Error::success();
+auto Memory64List = File.getMemory64List(E
@@ -132,6 +140,92 @@ class MinidumpFile : public Binary {
size_t Stride;
};
+ /// Class the provides an iterator over the memory64 memory ranges. Only the
+ /// the first descriptor is validated as readable beforehand.
+ class Memory64Iterator {
+ public:
+static
@@ -336,3 +336,88 @@ TEST(MinidumpYAML, ExceptionStream_ExtraParameter) {
0xab, 0xad, 0xca, 0xfe}),
*ExpectedContext);
}
+
+TEST(MinidumpYAML, MemoryRegion_64bit) {
+ SmallString<0> Storage;
+ auto ExpectedFile = toBinary(Storage, R"
@@ -132,6 +140,92 @@ class MinidumpFile : public Binary {
size_t Stride;
};
+ /// Class the provides an iterator over the memory64 memory ranges. Only the
+ /// the first descriptor is validated as readable beforehand.
+ class Memory64Iterator {
+ public:
+static
@@ -336,3 +336,88 @@ TEST(MinidumpYAML, ExceptionStream_ExtraParameter) {
0xab, 0xad, 0xca, 0xfe}),
*ExpectedContext);
}
+
+TEST(MinidumpYAML, MemoryRegion_64bit) {
+ SmallString<0> Storage;
+ auto ExpectedFile = toBinary(Storage, R"
@@ -336,3 +336,89 @@ TEST(MinidumpYAML, ExceptionStream_ExtraParameter) {
0xab, 0xad, 0xca, 0xfe}),
*ExpectedContext);
}
+
+TEST(MinidumpYAML, MemoryRegion_64bit) {
+ SmallString<0> Storage;
+ auto ExpectedFile = toBinary(Storage, R"
@@ -154,3 +155,50 @@ MinidumpFile::create(MemoryBufferRef Source) {
return std::unique_ptr(
new MinidumpFile(Source, Hdr, *ExpectedStreams, std::move(StreamMap)));
}
+
+static iterator_range
+makeEmptyRange(Error &Err) {
+ return make_range(
+ llvm::object::Minidu
@@ -494,6 +528,23 @@ Stream::create(const Directory &StreamDesc, const
object::MinidumpFile &File) {
}
return std::make_unique(std::move(Ranges));
}
+ case StreamKind::Memory64List: {
+Error Err = Error::success();
+auto Memory64List = File.getMemory64List(E
@@ -336,3 +336,88 @@ TEST(MinidumpYAML, ExceptionStream_ExtraParameter) {
0xab, 0xad, 0xca, 0xfe}),
*ExpectedContext);
}
+
+TEST(MinidumpYAML, MemoryRegion_64bit) {
+ SmallString<0> Storage;
+ auto ExpectedFile = toBinary(Storage, R"
@@ -336,3 +336,88 @@ TEST(MinidumpYAML, ExceptionStream_ExtraParameter) {
0xab, 0xad, 0xca, 0xfe}),
*ExpectedContext);
}
+
+TEST(MinidumpYAML, MemoryRegion_64bit) {
+ SmallString<0> Storage;
+ auto ExpectedFile = toBinary(Storage, R"
@@ -336,3 +336,88 @@ TEST(MinidumpYAML, ExceptionStream_ExtraParameter) {
0xab, 0xad, 0xca, 0xfe}),
*ExpectedContext);
}
+
+TEST(MinidumpYAML, MemoryRegion_64bit) {
+ SmallString<0> Storage;
+ auto ExpectedFile = toBinary(Storage, R"
@@ -132,6 +140,95 @@ class MinidumpFile : public Binary {
size_t Stride;
};
+ /// Class the provides an iterator over the memory64 memory ranges. Only the
+ /// the first descriptor is validated as readable beforehand.
+ class Memory64Iterator {
+ public:
+static
@@ -0,0 +1,459 @@
+//===-- DILAST.h *- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
DavidSpickett wrote:
> Thanks @DavidSpickett just to be sure, this is armv7 right, not AArch32?
This is an AArch32 container on Armv8. I'm not sure if lldb-server knows the
difference though. Maybe it doesn't need to, and ptrace single step is done in
the kernel which uses the h/w step.
But i
Author: David Spickett
Date: 2024-08-08T09:48:50+01:00
New Revision: 2771ce80f86e75ba38d9f5cb39fb37aa0268f0da
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2771ce80f86e75ba38d9f5cb39fb37aa0268f0da
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2771ce80f86e75ba38d9f5cb39fb37aa0268f0da.diff
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102144
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,459 @@
+//===-- DILAST.h *- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
Author: Pavel Labath
Date: 2024-08-08T10:53:15+02:00
New Revision: 57cd1000c9c93fd0e64352cfbc9fbbe5b8a8fcef
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/57cd1000c9c93fd0e64352cfbc9fbbe5b8a8fcef
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/57cd1000c9c93fd0e64352cfbc9fbbe5b8a8fcef.diff
https://github.com/labath closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102116
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+//===-- RealpathPrefixes.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+//===-- RealpathPrefixes.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/labath approved this pull request.
Thanks for your patience.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101237
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -788,7 +808,13 @@ Type::GetTypeScopeAndBasename(llvm::StringRef name) {
switch (pos.value()) {
case ':':
if (prev_is_colon && template_depth == 0) {
-result.scope.push_back(name.slice(name_begin, pos.index() - 1));
+llvm::StringRef scope_name =
@@ -134,6 +134,20 @@ bool TypeQuery::ContextMatches(
if (ctx == ctx_end)
return false; // Pattern too long.
+if (ctx->kind == CompilerContextKind::Namespace && ctx->name.IsEmpty()) {
labath wrote:
The anonymous namespace is detected and nullifie
@@ -440,12 +440,6 @@ static void GetTypeLookupContextImpl(DWARFDIE die,
continue;
}
-// If there is no name, then there is no need to look anything up for this
-// DIE.
-const char *name = die.GetName();
-if (!name || !name[0])
- return;
-
--
https://github.com/labath updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102111
>From c6936f3d5d0592babe9082e867b179af594c447b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Labath
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 09:51:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [lldb] Better matching of types in anonymous namespaces
This p
labath wrote:
> This patch relies on "(anonymous namespace)" being removed from the compiler
> contexts to work. What is the user types any of:
>
> ```
> (lldb) type lookup "(anonymous namespace)::A"
> (lldb) script lldb.target.FindFirstType("(anonymous namespace)::A");
> (lldb) script lldb.tar
https://github.com/labath commented:
> @labath I have added the class SharedSocket. I have implemented all the
> recommendations.
Looks mostly fine. Just a couple of notes. David, what do you think?
> Note we have the buildbot for cross tests (Windows x64/Linux x64 host and
> Linux Aarch64 t
@@ -44,6 +47,112 @@ using namespace llvm;
// option descriptors for getopt_long_only()
+#ifdef _WIN32
+typedef pipe_t fd_t;
+const fd_t kInvalidSharedFD = LLDB_INVALID_PIPE;
+#else
+typedef NativeSocket fd_t;
+const fd_t kInvalidSharedFD = Socket::kInvalidSocketValue;
+#endif
@@ -44,6 +47,112 @@ using namespace llvm;
// option descriptors for getopt_long_only()
+#ifdef _WIN32
+typedef pipe_t fd_t;
+const fd_t kInvalidSharedFD = LLDB_INVALID_PIPE;
+#else
+typedef NativeSocket fd_t;
+const fd_t kInvalidSharedFD = Socket::kInvalidSocketValue;
+#endif
@@ -114,6 +224,133 @@ static Status save_socket_id_to_file(const std::string
&socket_id,
return status;
}
+static void client_handle(GDBRemoteCommunicationServerPlatform &platform,
+ const lldb_private::Args &args) {
+ if (!platform.IsConnected())
https://github.com/labath edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101283
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
gribozavr wrote:
@mizvekov I will provide a more detailed response to the points you made in
your last message separately, but for now I would like to ask you to revert the
commit to unbreak us.
We looked into the problem internally and it does not look we have a simple
hack we can apply to r
https://github.com/Michael137 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102488
This will soon be needed for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102309,
where we plan on calling these APIs from generic ExpressionParser code.
>From 99dd6c9d974ffd95f3c2aed9dfb2a861cc55f084 Mon Sep 1
Michael137 wrote:
I checked their uses in the Swift repo and we always have a `Target` available
when we call these methods. So we should be able to use `Target::GetPlatform`
to replace those static calls.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102488
___
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Michael Buch (Michael137)
Changes
This will soon be needed for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102309,
where we plan on calling these APIs from generic ExpressionParser code.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pu
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102488
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102488
>From 99dd6c9d974ffd95f3c2aed9dfb2a861cc55f084 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:07:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb][Platform] Move the GetSDKPathFromDebugInfo helpers
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102497
>From d2f0b68afe6ebfffe5a2ef3ce14a77a5e1025c90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:07:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [lldb][Platform] Move the GetSDKPathFromDebugInfo helpers
@@ -336,3 +336,89 @@ TEST(MinidumpYAML, ExceptionStream_ExtraParameter) {
0xab, 0xad, 0xca, 0xfe}),
*ExpectedContext);
}
+
+TEST(MinidumpYAML, MemoryRegion_64bit) {
+ SmallString<0> Storage;
+ auto ExpectedFile = toBinary(Storage, R"
@@ -494,6 +528,23 @@ Stream::create(const Directory &StreamDesc, const
object::MinidumpFile &File) {
}
return std::make_unique(std::move(Ranges));
}
+ case StreamKind::Memory64List: {
+Error Err = Error::success();
+auto Memory64List = File.getMemory64List(E
https://github.com/Michael137 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102497
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102488
This reverts commit
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cf56e265e4b74799aee72a04b634fcc261078084.
The original change was reverted because
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Michael Buch (Michael137)
Changes
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102488
This reverts commit
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cf56e265e4b74799aee72a04b634fcc261078084.
The original change was reverted becau
https://github.com/Jlalond reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97470
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102488
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102497
>From d2f0b68afe6ebfffe5a2ef3ce14a77a5e1025c90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:07:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb][Platform] Move the GetSDKPathFromDebugInfo helpers
https://github.com/jimingham approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101934
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
mizvekov wrote:
> @mizvekov I will provide a more detailed response to the points you made in
> your last message separately, but for now I would like to ask you to revert
> the commit to unbreak us.
@gribozavr see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102510 for alternative.
> which mea
https://github.com/clayborg updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101237
>From f0cd3ef613b2da145b14a3d79d6810cc19e9b198 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Greg Clayton
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 13:37:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Impove ObjectFileELF's .dynamic parsing and usage.
This pat
Author: Greg Clayton
Date: 2024-08-08T11:04:52-07:00
New Revision: 28ba8a56b6fb9ec61897fa84369f46e43be94c03
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/28ba8a56b6fb9ec61897fa84369f46e43be94c03
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/28ba8a56b6fb9ec61897fa84369f46e43be94c03.diff
https://github.com/clayborg closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101237
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-x86_64-debian`
running on `lldb-x86_64-debian` while building `lldb` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/162/builds/3681
Here is the relevant piece of the build log f
https://github.com/slydiman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101283
>From 6b2a41ba3d71270e81e24a42d3b4f5dc2f96b939 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Vasilyev
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 05:41:21 +0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [lldb] Updated lldb-server to spawn the child process and
gribozavr wrote:
> @gribozavr see #102510 for alternative.
Thank you! We are looking at this now.
> That's not really true. You only need to upstream the AST affecting parts.
> The attributes itself and AST node which represent it.
The attributes are already upstream (we are reusing nullabili
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`cross-project-tests-sie-ubuntu-dwarf5` running on `doug-worker-1b` while
building `lldb` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-cross-project".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/163/bui
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`cross-project-tests-sie-ubuntu` running on `doug-worker-1a` while building
`lldb` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-cross-project".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/181/builds/302
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-aarch64-ubuntu`
running on `linaro-lldb-aarch64-ubuntu` while building `lldb` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/2872
Here is the relevant piece of the bui
https://github.com/adrian-prantl approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102497
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Med Ismail Bennani
Date: 2024-08-08T12:55:10-07:00
New Revision: 8334d2bfd34e2666db173269525d17352afa7bac
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8334d2bfd34e2666db173269525d17352afa7bac
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8334d2bfd34e2666db173269525d17352afa7bac.
https://github.com/medismailben closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101934
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102488
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
bolshakov-a wrote:
> From past conversations with IWYU maintainer, this was desirable, since IWYU
> rolls its own resugarer, which is faulty and difficult to maintain.
I just want to mention that, actually, IWYU doesn't probably need any resugarer
at all. A type template argument as-written is
@@ -436,6 +437,39 @@ class Platform : public PluginInterface {
return lldb_private::ConstString();
}
+ /// Search each CU associated with the specified 'module' for
+ /// the SDK paths the CUs were compiled against. In the presence
+ /// of different SDKs, we try to p
https://github.com/adrian-prantl approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102488
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
jimingham wrote:
> To extend on Pavel's modification of my idea:
>
> ```
> class ScriptedPlatform:
> def extends_platform_name(self):
> '''Get the name of the internal platform this class extends.'''
> return "iPhoneOS.platform"
> ```
>
> Then every function would have 3 variants:
>
https://github.com/felipepiovezan approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102539
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -1095,3 +1095,9 @@ bool ProcessElfCore::GetProcessInfo(ProcessInstanceInfo
&info) {
}
return true;
}
+
+const uint8_t *ProcessElfCore::PeekMemory(lldb::addr_t low, lldb::addr_t high,
Jlalond wrote:
Would an `ArrayRef` be better for reading from a core
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
darker --check --diff -r
1248698e9bb2a0232eee53a72679ed5077190a90...d5d772504b0fa993aad704d392a7eb02c9c717c1
lldb/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Miro Bucko (mbucko)
Changes
Summary:
The current implementation of 'Process::FindInMemory()' utilizes a slow
ReadMemory() API to search for 1 byte at a time in memory. This new overload
takes advantage of the fact that the process core is
https://github.com/bulbazord created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102539
This class is technically not usable in its current state. When you use it in a
simple C++ project, your compiler will complain about an incomplete definition
of SaveCoreOptions. Normally this isn't a problem
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Alex Langford (bulbazord)
Changes
This class is technically not usable in its current state. When you use it in a
simple C++ project, your compiler will complain about an incomplete definition
of SaveCoreOptions. Normally this isn't a prob
@@ -111,6 +111,9 @@ class ProcessElfCore : public
lldb_private::PostMortemProcess {
bool SupportsMemoryTagging() override { return !m_core_tag_ranges.IsEmpty();
}
+ const uint8_t *PeekMemory(lldb::addr_t low, lldb::addr_t high,
Jlalond wrote:
Same Array
felipepiovezan wrote:
LGTM! Good catch!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102539
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Jlalond wrote:
Great catch @bulbazord!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102539
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
bulbazord wrote:
This will need a cherry-pick to release/19.x after it lands.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102539
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/medismailben approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102539
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
adrian-prantl wrote:
@clayborg Based on the blamelist in
https://green.lab.llvm.org/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/as-lldb-cmake/9352/ this
broke
[lldb-api.functionalities/gdb_remote_client.TestGdbClientModuleLoad.py](https://green.lab.llvm.org/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/as-lldb-cmake/9352/testRep
https://github.com/clayborg approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102539
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,459 @@
+//===-- DILAST.h *- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/jimingham edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95738
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jimingham edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95738
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jimingham edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95738
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Leonard Chan
Date: 2024-08-08T23:05:23Z
New Revision: 1d9e1c6644a03530efbb09d419013ec0bfe0c823
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d9e1c6644a03530efbb09d419013ec0bfe0c823
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d9e1c6644a03530efbb09d419013ec0bfe0c823.diff
LOG:
clayborg wrote:
I am on it!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101237
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102488
>From 99dd6c9d974ffd95f3c2aed9dfb2a861cc55f084 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:07:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb][Platform] Move the GetSDKPathFromDebugInfo helpers
@@ -0,0 +1,459 @@
+//===-- DILAST.h *- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96538
>From 16ae2c3c04d908807d78224a8fee34f772a337fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:23:16 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [lldb] Support new libc++ __compressed_pair layout
---
ll
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99012
>From e3ec030cb404c407ead39b10d5ea0baa4a0683ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:37:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [WIP][lldb][test] Add a new __compressed_pair layout to
li
clayborg wrote:
I have identified the issue: with the new changes we are not successfully
getting the address of the DT_DEBUG when calling:
```
Address ObjectFileELF::GetImageInfoAddress(Target *target);
```
Working on a fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101237
jasonmolenda wrote:
> > Thanks @DavidSpickett just to be sure, this is armv7 right, not AArch32?
>
> This is an AArch32 container on Armv8. I'm not sure if lldb-server knows the
> difference though. Maybe it doesn't need to, and ptrace single step is done
> in the kernel which uses the h/w ste
jasonmolenda wrote:
The problem I now have is that debugserver doesn't do this nice behavior that
lldb-server does, recognizing that a thread was instruction-stepping and
rewriting the stop-reason as "trace" when it was actually "breakpoint-hit". I
can't update the debugserver on the armv7 wa
clayborg wrote:
I found the fix. Will have it in in a few minutes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101237
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
> or if we would implement a `TypeAliasTemplateSpecializationDecl` only for the
> benefit of external resugarers.
It is not only valuable to external resugarers. Another point that warrants an
introduction of it is for unevaluated lambdas. These lambdas e.g. appearing as
part o
@@ -2835,6 +2835,34 @@ void PruneThreadPlans();
AddressRanges &matches, size_t alignment,
size_t max_matches);
+ template
+ lldb::addr_t FindInMemoryGeneric(IT &&iterator, lldb::addr_t low,
+
https://github.com/clayborg created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102570
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101237 got reverted due to
buildbot failures. Opening a new PR to submit this again with a fix.
This patch improves the ability of a ObjectFileELF instanc
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Greg Clayton (clayborg)
Changes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101237 got reverted due to
buildbot failures. Opening a new PR to submit this again with a fix.
This patch improves the ability of a ObjectFileELF insta
clayborg wrote:
I am resubmitting this. I started out with the exact same patch, and then added
a diff that fixes and tests the issue that was failing.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102570
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.l
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
