bolshakov-a wrote: > From past conversations with IWYU maintainer, this was desirable, since IWYU > rolls its own resugarer, which is faulty and difficult to maintain.
I just want to mention that, actually, IWYU doesn't probably need any resugarer at all. A type template argument as-written is needed just to decide whether its canonical type should be reported for `#include`ing or not (e.g. because the `typedef` author has provided it already). Another way to do it is to collect a list of types blocked for reporting before scanning the instantiated template. I started rewriting IWYU in that direction some time ago. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101858 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
