mizvekov wrote: > @mizvekov I will provide a more detailed response to the points you made in > your last message separately, but for now I would like to ask you to revert > the commit to unbreak us.
@gribozavr see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102510 for alternative. > which means upstreaming 20 KLoC of nullability verification code which > involves resolving differences around pragma semantics etc.) That's not really true. You only need to upstream the AST affecting parts. The attributes itself and AST node which represent it. You can try proposing to add this attribute and guard it under an experimental flag, and promise no stability and to take ownership of it. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101858 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
