Hi Vicky,
I like the solution for the logo.
+1 Astrid
Am 2017-07-07 23:49, schrieb Vicky Vergara:
Something like this perhaps?
https://github.com/cvvergara/OSGeoLive-doc/blob/idea1/images/banner1.png
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Stephen Woodbridge
wrote:
Strictly from a branding point o
Stephen we are using these conversations in part to define the branding
standards.
It was a fun conversation explaining that many projects arrive at OSGeo
with a branding story already defined. OSGeo-Live as both a sub brand and a
project (and GeoForAll as a partnership) are in a unique position.
I also prefer [1] over [2], but I would like to see something better
than both...
Regarding incubation, I think it would be really easy to graduate at
this point, so lets make this a priority after 11.0 release.
Cheers,
Angelos
On 07/07/2017 10:23 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
Re new OSGeo-Liv
Stephen,
Each project (or community) will likely want to have a distinct logo. It
is useful in block diagrams inside presentations. Or as a logo in an
info-graphic, such as the metrics page at:
https://live.osgeo.org/en/metrics.html
As such, OSGeo-Live should have a distinct logo which is di
Well, I don't know what exactly the OSGeo standard is for branding, but
ignoring that, I would move the heart to be the dot above the "i" in
Live, because putting it on the OSGeo Logo dilutes the logo.
This presumes that the standard is some like [OSGeo Logo] [project logo]
-Steve
On 7/7/2017
Something like this perhaps?
https://github.com/cvvergara/OSGeoLive-doc/blob/idea1/images/banner1.png
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Stephen Woodbridge
wrote:
> Strictly from a branding point of view, we should not dilute the brand.
>
> OSGeo needs to set the branding standards, and then all p
Strictly from a branding point of view, we should not dilute the brand.
OSGeo needs to set the branding standards, and then all project should
follow that standard. If the standard is a compass, then OSGeo Live
should not change the center to be a heart, UNLESS the standard says the
all projec
Thanks James; so that is close to the "live-demo" vs "static-demo" idea.
Live distributions were used to provide a live demonstration of a linux
distribution for people to try out.
--
Jody Garnett
On 7 July 2017 at 12:12, James Klassen wrote:
> My understanding is "Live" in OSGeo Live comes fro
Thanks Cameron, and by extension everyone here, I understand and support
your reasoning. In this case I was just being a messenger from the
marketing exercise.
The next phase for the website (content creation / migration) should be
exciting, once I have a better understanding of what is involved I
Re new OSGeo-Live Logo:
* I feel strongly that the OSGeo-Live logo should be derived from the
OSGeo logo, but not be the same as the OSGeo logo.
* I feel it is important to say we are proud of our OSGeo roots and
associations, but also acknowledge and celebrate our added uniqueness.
We are a fa
My understanding is "Live" in OSGeo Live comes from the common use of the
term "Live" to describe a Linux distribution (or variant of a distribution)
that is meant to be run directly from read-only media (originally a CD or
DVD, now also including USB) and nominally doesn't change what is installed
Okay reporting back with ... a conversation. The graphics designer is now
off on holiday (actually honeymoon) but we got a lot done in the last two
weeks since I have spoken with you. The priority was obviously the website
and stuff for printing.
For my last updated I tried to adapt the new brandi
12 matches
Mail list logo
