Something like this perhaps? https://github.com/cvvergara/OSGeoLive-doc/blob/idea1/images/banner1.png
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Stephen Woodbridge <wood...@swoodbridge.com> wrote: > Strictly from a branding point of view, we should not dilute the brand. > > OSGeo needs to set the branding standards, and then all project should > follow that standard. If the standard is a compass, then OSGeo Live should > not change the center to be a heart, UNLESS the standard says the all > projects should adopt a unique center piece in the middle of the compass > for the respective projects. Otherwise this dilutes the brand. > > -Steve > > On 7/7/2017 3:23 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > >> Re new OSGeo-Live Logo: >> * I feel strongly that the OSGeo-Live logo should be derived from the >> OSGeo logo, but not be the same as the OSGeo logo. >> * I feel it is important to say we are proud of our OSGeo roots and >> associations, but also acknowledge and celebrate our added uniqueness. We >> are a family within a larger community. >> * I suspect you will find all OSGeo sub-projects feel similarly, and >> hence will want sub-brands. >> * Hence I think [1] (proposal logo with heart) is better than [2]. >> * However, I think we can do better than [1]. With our shot timelines I >> would reluctantly accept [1] for next release, with intent to revisit later. >> >> I'd be interested to see if Brian Hamlin puts something together. He has >> an artistic flair and I've really liked artwork he has created for prior >> OSGeo-Live releases. >> >> Re OSGeo Incubation: >> * I've answered on the incubation list, but in short, I suggest we >> revisit the question after OSGeo-Live 11.0 release. >> >> >> >> On 7/7/17 1:54 pm, Jody Garnett wrote: >> >>> Okay reporting back with ... a conversation. The graphics designer is >>> now off on holiday (actually honeymoon) but we got a lot done in the last >>> two weeks since I have spoken with you. The priority was obviously the >>> website and stuff for printing. >>> >>> For my last updated I tried to adapt the new branding elements and keep >>> the heart shape: >>> >>> [1] https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B022m344wU7hV0dUaU1ZdkFoM28 < >>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B022m344wU7hV0dUaU1ZdkFoM28> >>> >>> I did however manage to force the issue of subbrands; but doing up >>> printing materials including the geoforall and osgeo-live logo. You can >>> check the meeting notes for the result .... >>> >>> o Review of OSGeo Live branding history >>> + >>> >>> Discussion on relationship between projects and osgeo >>> >>> + >>> >>> We have an answer about “Live” - it is a live >>> demonstration of software, rather than a static demo. >>> >>> + >>> >>> We have a strong relationship and we could ask OSGeo Live >>> to use the OSGeo logo unaltered, however that does not >>> answer the general problem (of how to work with sub brands) >>> >>> >>> You may remember me asking what 'live" was meaning for osgeo live, >>> judging from early art assets in github (the svn banner had hidden early >>> prototypes of the logo). The thinking was "pulse" with hearts and heart >>> rate monitors tracking which projects were actually alive. The other >>> meaning I could come up with was a live demo, rather than a static demo. >>> >>> Both Marc (strong marketing background) and the graphics designer >>> (really proud of the new logo and visuals). They wanted to ask if OSGeo >>> Live would be willing to use the following: >>> >>> [2] https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B08AjQ2hqLipZjJsSG12a19HcWM < >>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B08AjQ2hqLipZjJsSG12a19HcWM> >>> >>> This is an interesting tradeoff: >>> - because no other software project is being asked to update their logo >>> (only include an OSGeo project logo on their website). >>> - the tight relationship with OSGeo foundation is causing this request, >>> so a mark at how central osgeo-live is to our foundation >>> - I will support whatever direction the project chooses to take >>> (hesitate to offer my own opinion since I can see advantages both ways). >>> >>> I have also had this question come up recently - why is OSGeo-Live not >>> an OSGeo project. The answer is simply that you have not asked and acquired >>> a mentor. >>> - You are of course welcome to apply as an OSGeo Community project (and >>> get approval right away - summer voting habits permitting) >>> - Entering incubation can also be done, but we need to line up a mentor >>> first. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jody Garnett >>> >>> On 22 June 2017 at 08:41, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com <mailto: >>> jody.garn...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Wanted to provide a small update, I got some public and private >>> feedback on the branding which I took into this weeks meeting. >>> >>> Many of the direct "osgeo foundation" activities just use the >>> normal OSGeo Mark, we have the examples of "OSGeo Project", "OSGeo >>> Community" as used by projects ready to go. >>> >>> A few sub brands (GeoForAll, OSGeo Live, local chapters) are >>> expected to work with the design elements and create their own >>> mark. We have asked the designer to use OSGeo Live as an example, >>> this was the best I could do without stepping out of contract :) >>> >>> I checked the EOI and we have not paid for a sphinx theme. We will >>> have to wait for the website to take shape and adapt later in the >>> year. Colors, logos and fonts we can do earlier. >>> -- >>> Jody Garnett >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Live-demo mailing list >>> Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org >>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo >>> http://live.osgeo.org >>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc >>> >> >> -- >> Cameron Shorter >> M +61 419 142 254 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Live-demo mailing list >> Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo >> http://live.osgeo.org >> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc >> >> > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > _______________________________________________ > Live-demo mailing list > Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo > http://live.osgeo.org > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc > -- Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) Salzmannstraße 44, 81739 München, Germany Vicky Vergara Operations Research eMail: vi...@georepublic.de Web: https://georepublic.info Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 CEO: Daniel Kastl
_______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http://live.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
