On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 13:51 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> I've tested on 8360, 8540 and 8641D and in all cases, the PHY
> ID returned for bus addr 0x1f is all zeros, and not all 0xf.
> This means we've been allocating a phydev for this "ghost".
>
> In addition to marking 0x0 as an invalid PHY ID
> Last year you have posted a MPC5200 PSC AC97 driver patch
> "[PATCH 9/9] sound: Add support for Freescale MPC5200 AC97 interface."
> with the following comment:
>
>
>> Not quite a clean driver, but it get things done (well, mostly).
>> Only included to be able to test functionalityi/usage of
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 08:51:00AM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 04:25:20PM +0100, Matt Sealey wrote:
> > I have a copy of the driver I hacked to work with the new PSC
> > framework but it doesn't "work" anymore - I have no idea why.
> >
> > Mail me privately
On Friday 11 April 2008, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 13:51 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > In addition to marking 0x0 as an invalid PHY ID, I've also
> > changed the existing somewhat useless printk to actually
> > list the bus IDs where it found a PHY so we get a basic
> > bus
All,
Thanks for the input and comments.
I am also having a look at the I2S driver. There were attempts some
time ago and I found few pieces of code floating on net but couldn't
find anything cleaned up. Did anyone tried to put the results of those
attempts together?
Cheers,
m.
_
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 10:06 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Friday 11 April 2008, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 13:51 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > > In addition to marking 0x0 as an invalid PHY ID, I've also
> > > changed the existing somewhat useless printk to actually
> >
Hello Kumar,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 09:21:34AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Guy's
>
> if you have work you want in 2.6.26 related to Freescale PPC's let me
> know. Ideally you can provide links to the patches in
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/
Please take a look at these:
[POWERPC] mp
fs_enet_close() calls napi_disable() unconditionally. This patch skips the
call when use_napi isn't set.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_ene
Hello Paul,
Please consider applying these patches for the 2.6.26. Pretty much of
new drivers depend on this support, including some of my patches and
patches from Jochen Friedrich and Laurent Pinchart.
My plan is to submit MPC83xx/MPC85xx specific parts to Kumar after these
two applied. Then I'l
This patch implements support for the GPIO LIB API. Two calls
unimplemented though: irq_to_gpio and gpio_to_irq.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt | 52
arch/powerpc/Kconfig |5
This patch implements various helpers to support OF bindings for
the GPIO LIB API.
Previously this was PowerPC specific, but it seems this code
isn't arch-dependent anyhow, so let's place it into of/.
SPARC will not see this addition yet, real hardware seem to not use
GPIOs at all. But this might
Hello all,
I'm not sure what kind of error this is. I'm trying to generate a kernel
image suitable for network boot and it seems to fail at the very end (wrong
target ?)
$ make ARCH=ppc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-uclibc- znetboot
powerpc-linux-uclibc-objcopy -O elf32-powerpc arch/ppc/boot/
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Thanks for the input and comments.
>
> I am also having a look at the I2S driver. There were attempts some
> time ago and I found few pieces of code floating on net but couldn't
> find anything cleaned u
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:47 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 10:06 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > On Friday 11 April 2008, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > PHY ID 0x0 isn't an invalid id, I got a Broadcom PHY that has
> > > PHY ID=0. Maybe I am misundersta
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Guillaume Dargaud
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm not sure what kind of error this is. I'm trying to generate a kernel
> image suitable for network boot and it seems to fail at the very end (wrong
> target ?)
>
> $ make ARCH=ppc CROSS_COMPILE=power
This series of patches implements the framework needed by of_platform_driver
i2c bus drivers.
i2c-mpc is then converted to an of_platform_driver and i2c-cpm is added as new
driver.
This is based on earlier work by Jon Smirl and Jean Delvare.
[PATCH1/7] i2c: Add support for device alias names
[P
On Mar 11, 2008, at 12:23 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
This is needed to support other localbus peripherals, such as
NAND on FSL UPM.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Would be great if someone from the MTD community will ack this patch
to go through powerpc trees.
Thanks,
Based on earlier work by Jon Smirl and Jean Delvare.
This patch allows new-style i2c chip drivers to have alias names using
the official kernel aliasing system and MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(). At this
point, the old i2c driver binding scheme (driver_name/type) is still
supported.
Signed-off-by: Jochen
Based on earlier work by Jon Smirl and Jean Delvare.
Update all the new-style i2c drivers to use standard module aliasing
instead of the old driver_name/type driver matching scheme.
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROT
This patch implements various helpers to support OF bindings for
the i2c API.
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/of/Kconfig |6 +++
drivers/of/Makefile|1 +
drivers/of/i2c.c | 115
include/linux/o
On Mar 11, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
These will be used by the FSL UPM NAND driver.
can this be a bit more descriptive. What exactly are these functions
trying to accomplish.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/Kconfig |5 ++
Based on earlier work by Jon Smirl.
Changed common name from powerpc_ to of_ per Olof's suggestion.
Convert MPC i2c driver from a platform_driver to a of_platform_driver. Add the
ability to dynamically load i2c drivers based on device tree names. Routine
names were changed from fsl_ to mpc_ to m
Based on earlier work by Jon Smirl and Jean Delvare.
Remove the old driver_name/type scheme for i2c driver matching. Only the
standard aliasing model will be used from now on.
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This driver uses the port of 2.4 code from Vitaly Bordug
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and the actual algorithm used by the i2c
driver of the DBox code on cvs.tuxboc.org from Felix Domke
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and Gillem ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) converted to an
of_platform_driver. Tested on CPM1 (MPC823 on dbox2 har
Initialize I2C pins on boards with CPM1/CPM2 controllers.
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8272ads.dts | 10 ++
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc866ads.dts | 10 ++
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc885ads.dts | 10 +++
On Mar 11, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
- get rid of `model = "UCC"' in the ucc nodes
It isn't used anywhere, so remove it. If we'll ever need something
like this, we'll use compatible property instead.
- replace cell-index and device-id properties by fsl,ucc.
Drivers are modifie
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Anton Vorontsov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch implements support for the GPIO LIB API. Two calls
> unimplemented though: irq_to_gpio and gpio_to_irq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I like it
Acked-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:18:25 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Valentine Barshak wrote:
> > The PowerPC 440GX Taishan board fails to reset EMAC3 (reset timeout error)
> > if there's no link. Because of that it fails to find PHY chip. The older
> > ibm_emac
> > driver had a workaround
Kumar Gala wrote:
> I'd prefer we use cell-index and not introduce "fsl,ucc".
Yeah, me too. cell-index is the right property for the UCC number.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Anton Vorontsov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch implements various helpers to support OF bindings for
> the GPIO LIB API.
>
> Previously this was PowerPC specific, but it seems this code
> isn't arch-dependent anyhow, so let's place it into of/.
>
> SPAR
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 06:44:24PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Apr 10, 2008, at 3:45 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> The kconfig entry can go away once arch/ppc and references to the
>> config in
>> drivers are removed.
>
> just to be clear. arch/powerpc will always just use the new binding and
>
Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> Thanks for the input and comments.
>>
>> I am also having a look at the I2S driver. There were attempts some
>> time ago and I found few pieces of code floating on net but couldn't
Jochen Friedrich wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8272ads.dts
b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8272ads.dts
index 7285ca1..7273996 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8272ads.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8272ads.dts
@@ -215,6 +215,16 @@
linux,network-
Hi all,
I've been trying hard to make the mtd-partitions available via device
tree on my MPC8343 local bus.
No success so far ...
Everything works fine on my MPC5200B based system - flash layout
definition is quite simple
To me it looks like there's a problem regarding the local bus in
On Friday 11 April 2008 17:13, Andre Schwarz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been trying hard to make the mtd-partitions available via device
> tree on my MPC8343 local bus.
> No success so far ...
>
> Everything works fine on my MPC5200B based system - flash layout
> definition is quite simple
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 06:34:31PM -0500, Andy Fleming wrote:
>
> + /*
> + * This is mildly evil, but so is our hardware for doing this.
> + * Also, we have to cast back to struct gfar_mii because of
> + * definition weirdness done in gianfar.h.
> + */
> + enet_regs =
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:13:47PM +0200, Andre Schwarz wrote:
> To me it looks like there's a problem regarding the local bus in general.
>
> Am I missing a "compatible" or anything else ? "reg" or "ranges" ?
Do you have an of_bus_ids[] entry that covers the localbus?
-Scott
In message: [PATCH v2.6.26] gianfar: Determine TBIPA value dynamically
on 10/04/2008 Andy Fleming wrote:
> TBIPA needs to be set to a value (on connected MDIO buses) that doesn't
> conflict with PHYs on the bus. By hardcoding it to 0x1f, we were preventing
> boards with PHYs at 0x1f from working
is the file zImage.elf my proper network image ?
What bootloader is on your board? zImage.elf *might* be the proper
image. If you're using u-boot, then you want to build a uImage
instead.
I... ahem... what would you recommand for a ML405 ?
Builroot gives to options of U-Boot or Yaboot. Have
On Apr 11, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 06:44:24PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 10, 2008, at 3:45 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
The kconfig entry can go away once arch/ppc and references to the
config in
drivers are removed.
just to be clear. arch/powerpc will alw
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Guillaume Dargaud
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > > is the file zImage.elf my proper network image ?
> > >
> >
> > What bootloader is on your board? zImage.elf *might* be the proper
> > image. If you're using u-boot, then you want to build a uImage
> > inste
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:13:36AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Mar 11, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> - get rid of `model = "UCC"' in the ucc nodes
>> It isn't used anywhere, so remove it. If we'll ever need something
>> like this, we'll use compatible property instead.
>> - rep
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:09:57AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Mar 11, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> These will be used by the FSL UPM NAND driver.
>
> can this be a bit more descriptive. What exactly are these functions
> trying to accomplish.
Yeah, sorry about that. Here is
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:09:57AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Mar 11, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
These will be used by the FSL UPM NAND driver.
can this be a bit more descriptive. What exactly are these functions
trying to accomplish.
Yeah, sorry abou
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:13:36AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Mar 11, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>>> - get rid of `model = "UCC"' in the ucc nodes
>>> It isn't used anywhere, so remove it. If we'll ever need something
>>> like this, we'll use compatible
Cleanups as suggested by Stephen Rothwell and Dale Farnsworth, which
incudes: mark a bunch of functions static; add vendor prefix to the
compat node check for uniqueness, add in missing of_node_put(), delete
unused DBG macros.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/boo
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:18:30AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:09:57AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> On Mar 11, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
These will be used by the FSL UPM NAND driver.
>>> can this be a bit more descriptive. W
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:48:37AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:13:36AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> On Mar 11, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> >>> - get rid of `model = "UCC"' in the ucc nodes
> >>> It isn't used anywhere, so remove
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> Do we want the first UCC to have a cell-index of 1? Maybe we should fix this
>> off-by-one error once and for all, and number all UCCs from 0?
>
> Isn't documentation numbers UCC from 1?
Yes.
> Then I believe we should stick
> with it for device tree, since off by on
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> From: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [POWERPC] UCC nodes cleanup
>
> - get rid of `model = "UCC"' in the ucc nodes
> It isn't used anywhere, so remove it. If we'll ever need something
> like this, we'll use compatible property instead.
> - replace last
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:06:57PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:48:37AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> > Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:13:36AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > >> On Mar 11, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > >>> - get rid o
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Or maybe I'm thinking here in terms of "fsl,ucc"... and cell-index is
> indeed should be -1... don't know. Please decide. ;-)
Well, that's what I was thinking. cell-index is zero-based, so UCC1 should have
cell-index = <0>.
Of course, this means all the code needs to ch
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:59:46PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8641_hpcn.dts
> b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8641_hpcn.dts
> index 79385bc..d5c2da4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8641_hpcn.dts
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8641_hpcn.dts
> @@ -13,7
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:12:30PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> > Or maybe I'm thinking here in terms of "fsl,ucc"... and cell-index is
> > indeed should be -1... don't know. Please decide. ;-)
>
> Well, that's what I was thinking. cell-index is zero-based, so UCC1 shoul
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:21:06PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:12:30PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> > Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> >
> > > Or maybe I'm thinking here in terms of "fsl,ucc"... and cell-index is
> > > indeed should be -1... don't know. Please decide. ;-)
> >
From: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:09:17 +0200
> +
> +config OF_I2C
> + def_bool y
> + depends on OF && PPC_OF && I2C
> + help
> + OpenFirmware I2C accessors
I wouldn't mind trying to use this infrastructure on
sparc64, and I don't see any power
add vendor prefix to the compat node check for uniqueness,
- compatible = "mpc86xx";
+ compatible = "wrs,sbc8641";
Either use the ticker thing (uppercase, "WIND,"), or, if you
prefer a lowercase name without that little extra namespace protection,
please use something more des
In message: Re: [PATCH] 86xx: mark functions static, other minor cleanups
on 11/04/2008 Scott Wood wrote:
> > model = "MPC8641HPCN";
> > - compatible = "mpc86xx";
> > + compatible = "fsl,mpc86xx";
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <1>;
>
> If we're changing the compatibl
2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Makefile |2 -
arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/idle.c | 67 +++
Updates: Shrink code even more from comments made on the list
This patch adds the ability for the CPU to go into wait state
On Apr 11, 2008, at 10:31, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 06:34:31PM -0500, Andy Fleming wrote:
+ /*
+* This is mildly evil, but so is our hardware for doing this.
+* Also, we have to cast back to struct gfar_mii because of
+* definition weirdness done
Andy Fleming wrote:
I tried. Technically, we can. But the issue is that struct gfar
*enet_regs->gfar_mii_regs is declared:
u8 gfar_mii_regs[24];
I could not find any sequence of castings that made the warning go away
about casting that to a struct gfar_mii __iomem *. And that includes
muc
Updated as per above, and with tickerized prefixes for sbc8641.
Care to try once more? It's only "tickerized" if it's in all
uppercase.
+ compatible = "wind,sbc8641";
Segher
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozl
This patch implements various helpers to support OF bindings for
the i2c API.
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/of/Kconfig |6 +++
drivers/of/Makefile|1 +
drivers/of/i2c.c | 115
include/linux/o
David Miller schrieb:
> I wouldn't mind trying to use this infrastructure on
> sparc64, and I don't see any powerpc specific interfaces
> being invoked, so if you could remove the PPC_OF
> requirement I'd appreciate it.
I've resenf the patch without the dependency on PPC_OF.
Thanks for the comme
Initialize I2C pins on boards with CPM1/CPM2 controllers.
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8272ads.dts | 10 ++
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc866ads.dts | 10 ++
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc885ads.dts | 10 +++
From: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:22:35 +0200
> This patch implements various helpers to support OF bindings for
> the i2c API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Scott,
thanks for your help ... but
Scott Wood wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:13:47PM +0200, Andre Schwarz wrote:
To me it looks like there's a problem regarding the local bus in general.
Am I missing a "compatible" or anything else ? "reg" or "ranges" ?
Do you have an of_bus_ids
André Schwarz wrote:
Scott,
thanks for your help ... but
Scott Wood wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:13:47PM +0200, Andre Schwarz wrote:
To me it looks like there's a problem regarding the local bus in general.
Am I missing a "compatible" or anything else ? "reg" or "ranges" ?
Do
When steal_context is used on SMP systems, it can steal a context in
use by one of the other processors leading to random page faults,
hung processors and general badness. This patch adds context tracking
as suggested by BenH.
Signed-off-by: Randy Vinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/mm/mm
ping.
Seeing this in -mm yet. Are those comments all wrong? Are you working on it?
On 03/12/2008 11:20 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 03/12/2008 10:43 PM, York Sun wrote:
+static int fsl_diu_open(struct fb_info *info, int user)
+{
+struct mfb_info *mfbi = info->par;
+int res = 0;
+
+spin
Reposting patch with following changes:
1. Changed phyp_dump_reserve_bootvar to just reserve_bootvar.
2. Changed 0x0001fff to 0x0fffUL.
Paulus,
If you think this is okay can you send this upstream ?
Many thanks,
Manish
A small proposed change in the amount of reserve space we allocate
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:22:35 +0200 Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This patch implements various helpers to support OF bindings for
> the i2c API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:45:35 +0200 Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 03/12/2008 11:20 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 03/12/2008 10:43 PM, York Sun wrote:
> >> +static int fsl_diu_open(struct fb_info *info, int user)
> >> +{
> >> +struct mfb_info *mfbi = info->par;
> >> +int res = 0;
There is a potential bug in __lmb_alloc_base where we subtract `size'
from the base address of a reserved region without checking whether
the subtraction could wrap around and produce a very large unsigned
value. In fact it probably isn't possible to hit the bug in practice
since it would only occ
Anton Vorontsov writes:
> Ok. Updated patch follows.
>
> Thanks!
>
> - - - -
> From: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [POWERPC] fsl_lbc: implement few UPM routines
Just a hint: your patches are less likely to get overlooked if you
change the subject of your email to describe the n
This makes no semantic changes. It fixes the whitespace and formatting
a bit, gets rid of a local DBG macro and uses the equivalent pr_debug
instead, and restructures one while loop that had a function call and
assignment in the condition to be a bit more readable. Some comments
about functions b
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
fs_enet_close() calls napi_disable() unconditionally. This patch skips the
call when use_napi isn't set.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/
77 matches
Mail list logo
