On Friday 11 April 2008, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 13:51 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > In addition to marking 0x0 as an invalid PHY ID, I've also > > changed the existing somewhat useless printk to actually > > list the bus IDs where it found a PHY so we get a basic > > bus summary. > > PHY ID 0x0 isn't an invalid id, I got a Broadcom PHY that has > PHY ID=0. Maybe I am misunderstanding something?
IIRC, address 0 is the PHY broadcast address, but can be used without problem with some PHY's. I remember some designs were we had the PHY at address 0. Best regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
