On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 10:06 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > On Friday 11 April 2008, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 13:51 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > > In addition to marking 0x0 as an invalid PHY ID, I've also > > > changed the existing somewhat useless printk to actually > > > list the bus IDs where it found a PHY so we get a basic > > > bus summary. > > > > PHY ID 0x0 isn't an invalid id, I got a Broadcom PHY that has > > PHY ID=0. Maybe I am misunderstanding something? > > IIRC, address 0 is the PHY broadcast address, but can be used without problem > with some PHY's. I remember some designs were we had the PHY at address 0.
Ouh, if that is so, I guess we need a CONFIG option or a new mdio bus property to select if PHY ID 0 is valid id or not. Jocke _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
