On Wednesday 17 October 2018 02:03 PM, Lorenzo Chelini wrote:
Hi All,
I am a PhD at IBM Zurich. I am playing around with the new POWER9 servers.
I am interested in plotting a roofline model for a given application, but I
need
to measure the traffic to and from the memory.
Ideally, what I woul
Le 30/06/2015 22:38, christophe leroy a écrit :
I'm trying to move the 3 microcode patches included in
arch/powerpc/sysdev/micropatch.c into the firmware directory in order
to use request_firmware() and then be able to add additional
micropatch that I need to relocate SMC2 on my MPC885.
I've n
> So it's old arch/ppc stuff. Now fs_platform_info is driver-internal and
> info comes from the device tree. You shouldn't touch the struct directly.
Now I moved all the initialization functions to the platform driver in
arch/powerpc/platform/82xx and the external ethernet on FCC2 still
works, so
On 03/29/2012 02:56 PM, Fabio wrote:
>> Which old kernel driver? Why do you need to mess with fs_platform_info?
> I have to port a custom platform driver written for 2.6.10 to support
> this custom board.
So it's old arch/ppc stuff. Now fs_platform_info is driver-internal and
info comes from the
> Which old kernel driver? Why do you need to mess with fs_platform_info?
I have to port a custom platform driver written for 2.6.10 to support
this custom board.
That driver directly initializes the fs_platform_info data structure,
so after some failed attempts I thought to directly assign some v
On 03/28/2012 11:13 AM, Fabio wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am a newbie trying to get the FCC1 ethernet interface to work on a
> custom board.
> The hardware used is based on mpc8270 which is connected via FCC1 to a
> phy-less interface linked to another microcontroller.
> FCC1 should be recognized as eth0
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:38:58 +0800
G.H.Lee wrote:
...
> I am a new user of the board TWR-MPC5125 made by freescale. Now I am trying
> to porting the new kernel, i.e. the version 3.0.4, to this board. I have
> porting the serial driver and the nand flash driver successfully. And I can
> als
WANG YiFei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a board which has 1 SPI master controller and 4 SPI slave devices,
> and we'd like to use 2 GPIOs to demux to chip select these slave devices.
> Can anyone tell me if current powerpc dts support demuxer for chip select for
> spi slave devices? So far as I know
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 15:36 -0500, Ayman El-Khashab wrote:
>
> The exact details (though I don't think they are too useful are as follows.
> The one interesting item if I read it correctly, is that the CPU was
> trying to get instructions from c002 address. However, this board only
> has 512
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 12:11 +0800, Li.Wang wrote:
> Hi Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
Well, I'm sure you'll have more chance with this one asking somebody
from Freescale :-)
It does look like there may be a coherency problem but I don't know
those chips well enough to tell
Cheers,
Ben.
> I use Freesca
To: mich...@ellerman.id.au
Cc: Kumar Gopalpet-B05799; net...@vger.kernel.org;
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [HELP] BAD interrupts
Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 19:41 +0530, Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying linux 2.6.32-rc3 in SMP
>-Original Message-
>From: gshan [mailto:gs...@alcatel-lucent.com]
>Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 5:16 PM
>To: mich...@ellerman.id.au
>Cc: Kumar Gopalpet-B05799; net...@vger.kernel.org;
>linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
>Subject: Re: [HELP] BAD interrupts
>
Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 19:41 +0530, Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying linux 2.6.32-rc3 in SMP mode. I am seeing a lot of BAD
interrupts when I do a "cat /proc/interrupts".
I am running a forwarding application b/w two ethernet ports (ethernet
uses
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 19:41 +0530, Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying linux 2.6.32-rc3 in SMP mode. I am seeing a lot of BAD
> interrupts when I do a "cat /proc/interrupts".
>
> I am running a forwarding application b/w two ethernet ports (ethernet
> uses gianfar driver).
>
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 12:27 -0500, Ayman El-Khashab wrote:
>
> The first problem I noticed is that the physical address is read into a
> 32 bit variable, but the 460ex has a 36 bit bus so the ioremap would
> always fail. I've change the defn of chip_phys in mpt2sas_base.h to u64
> and that cle
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Joe Shmo wrote:
>
> I'm attempting to get SPI to work on my embedded design
> that is based on the mpc8313erbd reference board wiht a
> 2.6.27 kernel. I cannot open the SPI device.
> Tracing through the kernel code, it looks like the device is
> not being fou
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:33:24AM -0700, skateaboard wrote:
>
>Ok so I'm really new to this but a single line answer will do, like "One of
>the best and noob friendly PPC Multi media distributors would be _."
>
>What I have:
>A PPC ibook G3 laptop
>
>What I need help with:
>Finding a linux
Landau, Bracha wrote:
I've upgraded to the latest kernel (2.6.29), and after updating the
configuration the cuImage did boot.
What's the difference between the address for the early debug console for
cuImage and uImage + blob?
The address is wherever the previous driver (u-boot or bootwrapper
nt: Monday, May 04, 2009 7:31 PM
To: Landau, Bracha
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: help with MPC8272ADS board
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 10:16:29AM +0300, Landau, Bracha wrote:
> I'm trying to get the MPC8272ADS evaluation board up and running with
> the latest versions of
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 10:16:29AM +0300, Landau, Bracha wrote:
> I'm trying to get the MPC8272ADS evaluation board up and running with
> the latest versions of u-boot and Denx linux (2.6.24).
2.6.24 is nowhere near the latest version of Linux. If you specifically
want to use a Denx kernel, you'r
Dear Bracha,
In message <065a7d06f7d4e546a18e80e08d066e1811892dd...@ilma1.il.nds.com> you
wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get the MPC8272ADS evaluation board up and running with
> the latest versions of u-boot and Denx linux (2.6.24).
2.6.24 is actually very old and not even close to latest. "Latest"
Scott Wood wrote:
Chris Friesen wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:
Is the compiler assigning r0 to addr? That will be treated as a
literal zero instead. Try changing "r" (addr) to "b" (addr), or use
stwx.
Bingo! Is there a constraint to tell the compiler to not use r0 for addr?
Yes, "b".
Doh. S
Chris Friesen wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:
Is the compiler assigning r0 to addr? That will be treated as a
literal zero instead. Try changing "r" (addr) to "b" (addr), or use
stwx.
Bingo! Is there a constraint to tell the compiler to not use r0 for addr?
Yes, "b".
-Scott
___
Scott Wood wrote:
Chris Friesen wrote:
I've got a function that is used to overwrite opcodes in order to create
self-modifying code. It worked just fine with previous compilers, but
with gcc 4.3 it seems like it sometimes (but not always) causes problems
when inlined. If I force it to never
Chris Friesen wrote:
I've got a function that is used to overwrite opcodes in order to create
self-modifying code. It worked just fine with previous compilers, but
with gcc 4.3 it seems like it sometimes (but not always) causes problems
when inlined. If I force it to never be inlined, it work
at the same location. Always after this
> print info "<4>Mount-cache hash table entries: 512".
>
> Best Regards,
> Sun
>
>
>> From: s...@denx.de
>> To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
>> Subject: Re: Help!Some memory doesn't work on PPC405Ex based
On 4/14/09 4:08 AM, SunNeo wrote:
> My platform uses the MICRON MT47H256M8THN DDRII SDRAM and the DDRII SDRAM is
> soldered on the board.
>
> As I said, my board was similar with "Kilauea" evb, so I created my
> configuration header file from Kilauea's at U-Boot. In the configuration file,
> regis
Hi Sun,
On Tuesday 14 April 2009, SunNeo wrote:
> My platform uses the MICRON MT47H256M8THN DDRII SDRAM and the DDRII SDRAM
> is soldered on the board.
>
> As I said, my board was similar with "Kilauea" evb, so I created my
> configuration header file from Kilauea's at U-Boot. In the configuration
d under
U-Boot command prompt to modify value of high 512M memory, and this command
works well.
About booting Linux, the kernel hangs at the same location. Always after this
print info "<4>Mount-cache hash table entries: 512".
Best Regards,
Sun
> From: s...@denx.de
&g
On Monday 13 April 2009, SunNeo wrote:
> I'm porting Linux-2.6.29 on PPC405Ex based board, it's very similar to AMCC
> "Kilauea" evb.
>
> In my board, two 512MB DDRII memory is connected to 2 ranks of the 405Ex
> CPU. This 1GB memory works well at U-Boot-2009.01, but when I boot
> Linux-2.6.29, the
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Subodh Nijsure
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need some help in understanding the interrupts = <...> section of DTB file.
>
> I have read the Documentation/booting-without-of.txt and I understand
> that interrupts = means interrupt A and B is "enum" that
> indicates if it
2009/1/26 Scott Wood
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:17:05AM +0100, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> > I understand that my load address is 0x40 and that the image is too
> big,
> > but I can't find where this load adress is defined.
> > It seems (from the .../arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper file) that t
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:17:05AM +0100, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> I have a working Kernel with a NFS mounted root filesystem.
> I am trying to use my root file system, but with the use of initramfs.
>
> Compiling the kernel is not a problem, but when booting, I have the
> following error:
>
> I'm still working on various issues with the hardware. Soon I'll be able
> to easily test several boards in the same system at the same time. Once
> I've proven that works, I'll start nagging :)
>
> Is there a better subject line I should use to get attention, or should
> I just start CC'ing pe
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:04:28PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 16:17 -0800, Ira Snyder wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 05:29:53PM -0600, Ayman El-Khashab wrote:
> > > My system consists of a pair of 460EXs attached by way of both PCI-E and
> > > PCI. Ultimately
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 16:17 -0800, Ira Snyder wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 05:29:53PM -0600, Ayman El-Khashab wrote:
> > My system consists of a pair of 460EXs attached by way of both PCI-E and
> > PCI. Ultimately my goal is to communicate between them via pci-e (is
> > there anything out ther
> -Original Message-
> From: Ira Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 6:18 PM
> To: Ayman El-Khashab
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: Help enabling PCI endpoint on 460EX, host sees disabled
>
>
> I can't hel
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 05:29:53PM -0600, Ayman El-Khashab wrote:
> My system consists of a pair of 460EXs attached by way of both PCI-E and
> PCI. Ultimately my goal is to communicate between them via pci-e (is
> there anything out there that does this already?).
I can't help you with that exact
On Wednesday 13 August 2008, Boris Shteinbock wrote:
> Help
Don't panic!
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Thanks Anton,
With the kernel version 2.6.20 I am using Majority of this changes are
hard code values in mpc8313.c
I did already changed this value for my custom board file.
But I am getting the error irrespectively.
Is the relatonship description between USB DR clk and other as mentioned
in
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 02:32:22PM -0400, Suvidh Kankariya wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to use the mpc8313e internal usb phy with internal
> oscillator frequency of 24 Mz. in host mode on a custom board.
> Whenever I plugin any low/fast speed device the device gets detected but
> then always get
Hi Dave,
On Tuesday 11 March 2008 23:54, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 03:27:26PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > the migration process from ARCH=ppc to ARCH=powerpc is easier than I
> > thought in some parts, but a few devices are still giving me
> > heada
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 03:27:26PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> the migration process from ARCH=ppc to ARCH=powerpc is easier than I
> thought in some parts, but a few devices are still giving me
> headaches. This should hopefully be one of my last major requests
> for help (
Rune Torgersen wrote:
>> From: Scott Wood
>>
>> You could add something to the cuboot code to fill in current-speed
>> based on the value in the bd_t.
>>
>
> Ahh.. That was what I'm missing.
> Where in the devicetree is that supposed to be at?
In the serial node.
-Scott
___
> From: Scott Wood
>
> You could add something to the cuboot code to fill in current-speed
> based on the value in the bd_t.
>
Ahh.. That was what I'm missing.
Where in the devicetree is that supposed to be at?
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-
Rune Torgersen wrote:
> Ok, needed a valid console= line on the command line. WHen we tried
> that, we had a typo, so it was not recognized.
> Our old 2.6.18 arch/ppc kernel didn't need a console parameter, it got
> the baudrate from u-boot somehow.
> Anyway of doing that here too?
You could add s
> From: Rune Torgersen
> Finally got it (sort-of) working.
> Turned out that for some reason the console init is setting
> the baudrate
> to 9600
> the options string passed in to the console init fuunction is NULL.
>
> Any idea oon how this should be passed in from u-boot?
Ok, needed a valid co
> From: Scott Wood [
> Rune Torgersen wrote:
> > Not sure what was wrong. We took a step back, and redid
> some stuff, and
> > now we have serial output from the boot-wrapper.
> > THe checkstop came from the wrapper grying to access the
> bcsr and doing
> > the chip select fixup. We don';t have a
Rune Torgersen wrote:
> Not sure what was wrong. We took a step back, and redid some stuff, and
> now we have serial output from the boot-wrapper.
> THe checkstop came from the wrapper grying to access the bcsr and doing
> the chip select fixup. We don';t have a bcsr on our board, and the cs
> layo
> From: Scott Wood
>
> The tree looks OK. The checkstop may be from erratum SIU18;
> I had this issue on the ep8248e board.
>
> Try clearing BCR[PLDP].
Not sure what was wrong. We took a step back, and redid some stuff, and
now we have serial output from the boot-wrapper.
THe checkstop came fro
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 05:07:23PM -0600, Rune Torgersen wrote:
> > From: Scott Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Rune Torgersen wrote:
> > > Did that, now we get e checkstop resert. Time to hook up the
> > > BDI-2000 Is there a way to have the bootwrapper use the u-boot
> > > serial for a wh
> From: Scott Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Rune Torgersen wrote:
> >> From: Scott Wood
> >> Don't forget to exclude the SMC parameter RAM from the muram
> >> data area
> >> in /soc/cpm/muram/data/reg. If you have an older device
> tree binding
> >> that has no /soc/cpm/muram node, but ins
Rune Torgersen wrote:
>> From: Scott Wood
>> Don't forget to exclude the SMC parameter RAM from the muram
>> data area
>> in /soc/cpm/muram/data/reg. If you have an older device tree binding
>> that has no /soc/cpm/muram node, but instead has two resources in
>> /soc/cpm/reg, you need to move
> From: Scott Wood
> Don't forget to exclude the SMC parameter RAM from the muram
> data area
> in /soc/cpm/muram/data/reg. If you have an older device tree binding
> that has no /soc/cpm/muram node, but instead has two resources in
> /soc/cpm/reg, you need to move to head-of-tree to get this
Rune Torgersen wrote:
> Ok we're now using
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> device_type = "serial";
> compatible = "fsl,mpc8280-smc-uart",
>"fsl,cpm2-smc-uart";
> reg = <11a80 10 0 40>;// parameter_ram_address length>
> interrupts = <4 8>;
> From: Scott Wood
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 1:46 PM
> > We're trying to get a SMC serial port on a8280 to work.
> > I cannot find any ecxamples on the binding, so we've tried
> to make one.
> >
> > is this anywhere close to workable?
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> > device_type =
Rune Torgersen wrote:
> Hi
>
> We're trying to get a SMC serial port on a8280 to work.
> I cannot find any ecxamples on the binding, so we've tried to make one.
>
> is this anywhere close to workable?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> device_type = "serial";
> compatible = "fsl,mpc8280-smc-u
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 02:39:04PM +0800, vincent.liu wrote:
> These days I am working on a MPC8270 based board with linux 2.6.10 kernel.
> When I use the default kernel and load the uImage to the target board.
> The kernel hangs after uncompressing kernel image ... ok .
The "default kernel" for w
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 09:57:02AM -0400, Cesar Bello wrote:
> Hi, I'm writing from Venezuela. I have to prepair a presentation about
> Debian on IBM pSerires Servers with Power 5+ processors. My first question
> is what are the advantages of use Debian GNU/Linux on pSeries Servers?
Advantages as
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 09:57:02AM -0400, Cesar Bello wrote:
> Hi, I'm writing from Venezuela. I have to prepair a presentation about
> Debian on IBM pSerires Servers with Power 5+ processors. My first question
> is what are the advantages of use Debian GNU/Linux on pSeries Servers?
Sounds li
Well, I've played around with the sections a bit more, and just can't
seem to get it to work. As soon as I apply the following, the kernel
refuses to boot. (And if I remove the changes to _GLOBAL, then it
refuses to boot if I enable CONFIG_KPROBES.)
Index: linux/include/asm-ppc/processor.h
> The ppc64 version appends ',"a"' to the kprobes.text section line. Is
> this needed here as well? Could someone elaborate on exactly what its
> purpose is?
It's the (ELF) section attributes for the section. If this
is executable code, it should be "ax"; if it's writable, it
should be "wa"; if
Grant Likely wrote:
> Mild question; What the [EMAIL PROTECTED] are you doing trying to backport to
> a
> 2 year old kernel?!? :-)
That's what happens in the embedded space. It's the current version
from our distro vendor. It's also the version that all our different
board suppliers could a
On 7/26/07, Chris Friesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm porting kprobes to 2.6.14, and I think I've got it mostly done. The
> last thing that I want to do is to mark flush_icache_range() as part of
> the .kprobes.text section so that we don't accidently try to probe it.
Hey Chris
Hello, Vikram!
Vikram Kone schrieb:
> Hi..
> I'm a linux newbie and im working on porting the USB driver ISP1362 by
> Philips on to my Freescale ppc board.
Please don't crosspost.
Please don't write HTML.
> I dont know how to do this... so if any of you can tell me how to do
> this step by ste
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 03:57:32PM -0700, Vikram Kone wrote:
>
>Hi..
>I'm a linux newbie and im working on porting the USB driver ISP1362 by
>Philips on to my Freescale ppc board.
>I dont know how to do this... so if any of you can tell me how to do this
>step by step, i would
66 matches
Mail list logo
