On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 15:36 -0500, Ayman El-Khashab wrote: > > The exact details (though I don't think they are too useful are as follows. > The one interesting item if I read it correctly, is that the CPU was > trying to get instructions from c002xxxx address. However, this board only > has 512MB of memory so it seems that the address (if it is physical) isn't > valid.
Actually this is a perfectly valid virtual address. The kernel maps memory at 0xc0000000 (at least the first 768M of it, the rest is dynamically mapped in/out). > Are there any tricks we can use to analyze this problem? Or is there any > information we can collect to help pinpoint where this issue might lie? Well, xmon is your friend ... Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
