Sergej Stepanov wrote:
>> We also need to change the reference to port C in fsl,mdio-pin and
>> fsl,mdc-pin.
> Do you mean this:
>Currently defined compatibles:
>fsl,pq1-fec-mdio (reg is same as first resource of FEC device)
> -> fsl,cpm2-mdio-bitbang (reg is port C registers)
>
>Prop
Am Donnerstag, den 08.11.2007, 14:20 -0600 schrieb Scott Wood:
> Sergej Stepanov wrote:
> > If both mdio and mdc controlling pins are on the same processor port,
> > one resource should be used.
> > Otherwise, two resources are used: the 1-st - mdio, the 2-nd - mdc.
>
> How about:
> The first reg
Sergej Stepanov wrote:
> If both mdio and mdc controlling pins are on the same processor port,
> one resource should be used.
> Otherwise, two resources are used: the 1-st - mdio, the 2-nd - mdc.
How about:
The first reg resource is the I/O port register block on which MDIO
resides. The second r
Am Dienstag, den 06.11.2007, 12:46 -0600 schrieb Scott Wood:
> >
> > + The "reg"-property may have also depending on board design
> > + the following form:
> > + reg = <10d40 14 10d60 14>;
> > + In that case the pin for mdio data controlling is on the port C,
> > + and the pin for mdio
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 09:51:57AM +0100, Sergej Stepanov wrote:
> The patch updates the booting-without-of.txt-file.
> There is a description for the case
> if mdio data and clock pins are on different processor ports.
> It is a extending for e-mail "[PATCH v3] using mii-bitbang on different
> pr
The patch updates the booting-without-of.txt-file.
There is a description for the case
if mdio data and clock pins are on different processor ports.
It is a extending for e-mail "[PATCH v3] using mii-bitbang on different
processor ports".
Signed-off-by: Sergej Stepanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
dif
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:09:19PM +0100, Sergej Stepanov wrote:
> The patch makes possible to have mdio and mdc pins on different physical ports
> also for CONFIG_PPC_CPM_NEW_BINDING.
> To setup it in the device tree:
> reg = <10d40 14 10d60 14>; // mdc-offset: 0x10d40, mdio-offset: 0x10d60
> or
>
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:09:19 +0100 Sergej Stepanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> static int __devinit fs_mii_bitbang_init(struct mii_bus *bus,
> struct device_node *np)
> {
> - struct resource res;
> + struct resource res[2];
Why not just reuse
Sergej Stepanov wrote:
> Hello Scott.
> Thank you for reply.
> Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2007, 11:32 -0500 schrieb Scott Wood:
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:09:19PM +0100, Sergej Stepanov wrote:
>
>> You could just use of_iomap() for the second one, since we don't need
>> the physical address for bus
Hello Scott.
Thank you for reply.
Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2007, 11:32 -0500 schrieb Scott Wood:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:09:19PM +0100, Sergej Stepanov wrote:
> You could just use of_iomap() for the second one, since we don't need
> the physical address for bus->id.
Nice tip.
Than it would be n
The patch makes possible to have mdio and mdc pins on different physical ports
also for CONFIG_PPC_CPM_NEW_BINDING.
To setup it in the device tree:
reg = <10d40 14 10d60 14>; // mdc-offset: 0x10d40, mdio-offset: 0x10d60
or
reg = <10d40 14>; // mdc and mdio have the same offset 0x10d40
The approach
11 matches
Mail list logo
