Sergej Stepanov wrote: >> We also need to change the reference to port C in fsl,mdio-pin and >> fsl,mdc-pin. > Do you mean this: > Currently defined compatibles: > fsl,pq1-fec-mdio (reg is same as first resource of FEC device) > -> fsl,cpm2-mdio-bitbang (reg is port C registers) > > Properties for fsl,cpm2-mdio-bitbang: > -> fsl,mdio-pin : pin of port C controlling mdio data > -> fsl,mdc-pin : pin of port C controlling mdio clock
Yes. > Right. But i thought it would be related to the example, > and than the reader gets the short comment about I/O ports. No, the example is the example, and the spec is the spec. :-) > Or the other variant would be: > -------------------- > iv) MDIO > > Currently defined compatibles: > fsl,pq1-fec-mdio (reg is same as first resource of FEC device) > fsl,cpm2-mdio-bitbang (reg is the I/O port register block(s)) > > Properties for fsl,cpm2-mdio-bitbang: > The first reg resource is the I/O port register block on which MDIO > resides. The second reg resource is the I/O port register block on > which MDC resides. If there is only one reg resource, it is used for > both MDIO and MDC. > fsl,mdio-pin : pin of chosen port for controlling mdio data > fsl,mdc-pin : pin of chosen port for controlling mdio clock Looks good. We can eliminate the parenthetical for fsl,cpm2-mdio-bitbang because reg is now explained below. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
