Re: [PATCHv3 net-next] net: modernize IRQ resource acquisition

2024-11-12 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
address_to_resource() with platform_get_resource() for the > same reason. > > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev > (for CAN) > Reviewed-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Please write this as: Reviewed-by: Marc Kleine-Budde # for CAN regards, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Ma

Re: [PATCHv2 net-next] net: use pdev instead of OF funcs

2024-11-12 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
pilation errors. Also removed non devm transformations. > Those will be handled separately. Also reworded description. > drivers/net/can/grcan.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c | 2 +- Reviewed by: Marc Kleine-Budde # f

Re: [net-next PATCH 3/4] netdev: replace napi_reschedule with napi_schedule

2023-10-03 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 03.10.2023 13:18:33, Christian Marangi wrote: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 09:16:33AM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > > On 02.10.2023 17:10:22, Christian Marangi wrote: > > > Now that napi_schedule return a bool, we can drop napi_reschedule that > > > does the same e

Re: [net-next PATCH 3/4] netdev: replace napi_reschedule with napi_schedule

2023-10-03 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
an/dev/rx-offload.c | 2 +- Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde # for can/dev/rx-offload.c regards, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121

Re: [PATCH] net: Explicitly include correct DT includes

2023-07-16 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
m_can/m_can.h | 1 - > drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c | 1 - > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_platform.c | 1 - > drivers/net/can/sun4i_can.c | 1 - > drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c

Re: [PATCH] net: Use of_property_read_bool() for boolean properties

2023-03-12 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
ty_read_bool(). > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring > --- > drivers/net/can/cc770/cc770_platform.c | 12 ++-- Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde # for net/can regards, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | ht

Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] powerpc/mpc5xxx: Switch mpc5xxx_get_bus_frequency() to use fwnode

2022-05-04 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
| 2 +- > drivers/tty/serial/mpc52xx_uart.c | 4 +- > 11 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde # for mscan/mpc5xxx_can regards, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux

Re: [PATCH v6] flexcan: add err_irq handler for flexcan

2014-07-03 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
te (FLEXCAN_ESR_ERR_STATE). The next step is to figure out which bits in which register trigger the error irq. Then move the code handling this register into the error irq handler. As the seconds half of the error irq handling takes place in the napi function, you have to duplicate the napi_sche

Re: [PATCH v5] flexcan: add err_irq handler for flexcan

2014-07-03 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
code from flexcan_irq to flexcan_err_irq > - call flexcan_err_irq from flexcan_irq Why do you move the RX IRQ handling into the error IRQ function? If I understand you correctly you only want to do error interrupt handling the error IRQ function, right? Marc -- Pengutronix e.K.

Re: [PATCH v4] flexcan: add err_irq handler for flexcan

2014-07-02 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 07/02/2014 10:32 AM, qiang.z...@freescale.com wrote: > On 07/02/2014 03:04 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Marc Kleine-Budde [mailto:m...@pengutronix.de] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 3:04 PM >> To: Zhao Qiang-B45475; linux

Re: [PATCH v4] flexcan: add err_irq handler for flexcan

2014-07-02 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
ANDLED if flexcan_irq is triggered. > But err_irq is shared with other devices, it should return IRQ_HANDLED when > the interrupt > is triggered by flexcan device, if not return IRQ_NONE. What about fixing flexcan_irq() first and the make use of it? Marc -- Pengutron

Re: [PATCH v4] flexcan: add err_irq handler for flexcan

2014-07-01 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
-1149,6 +1184,7 @@ static int flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > dev->flags |= IFF_ECHO; > > priv = netdev_priv(dev); > + priv->err_irq = err_irq; > priv->can.clock.freq = clock_freq; > priv->can.bittiming_const = &flexcan_bittim

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] flexcan: add err_irq handler for flexcan

2014-06-23 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
ts anyway? > > Calling the normal interrupt doesn't work. Why? flexcan_irq() if FLEXCAN_CTRL_TWRN_MSK is set and will schedule the NAPI routine: > if ((reg_iflag1 & FLEXCAN_IFLAG_RX_FIFO_AVAILABLE) || > (reg_esr & FLEXCAN_ESR_ERR_STATE) || > flexcan_has_an

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] flexcan: add err_irq handler for flexcan

2014-06-23 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 06/23/2014 09:26 AM, qiang.z...@freescale.com wrote: > > On 06/23/2014 03:18 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > >> >> On 06/23/2014 09:11 AM, Zhao Qiang wrote: >>> when flexcan is not physically linked, command 'cantest' will trigger >>> an err_ir

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] flexcan: add err_irq handler for flexcan

2014-06-23 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
trl); > + netif_stop_queue(dev); Why are you stopping the txqueue? > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > + } > + return IRQ_NONE; > +} > + Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions| Phone:

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] flexcan: add err_irq handler for flexcan

2014-06-21 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
;pdev->dev, mem); > if (IS_ERR(base)) > return PTR_ERR(base); > @@ -1149,6 +1177,7 @@ static int flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > dev->flags |= IFF_ECHO; > > priv = netdev_priv(dev); > + priv->err_irq = err_irq; >

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] flexcan: add err interrupt for p1010rdb

2014-06-20 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
we don't need it, please reflect this in the documentation update. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions| Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917- | Amtsgericht Hilde

Re: [PATCH 1/2] flexcan: add err_irq handler for flexcan

2014-06-19 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
err_irq = 0; > + > base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, mem); > if (IS_ERR(base)) > return PTR_ERR(base); > @@ -1057,6 +1085,7 @@ static int flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > dev->flags |= IFF_ECHO; > > p

Re: [PATCH 2/2] flexcan: add err interrupt for p1010rdb

2014-06-19 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
; }; > > can1: can@1d000 { > compatible = "fsl,p1010-flexcan"; > reg = <0x1d000 0x1000>; > - interrupts = <61 0x2 0 0>; > + interrupts = <61 0x2 0 0 > +

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] usb: Reuse fsl driver code for synopsys usb controller

2014-04-20 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
/chipidea. It's maintained by Peter Chen (Cc'ed) and is in better shape than the freescale driver. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions| Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +

Re: [PATCH v4 11/31] net: can: mscan: improve clock API use

2013-08-07 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 08/07/2013 09:30 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 08/06/2013 10:43 PM, Gerhard Sittig wrote: >> the .get_clock() callback is run from probe() and might allocate >> resources, introduce a .put_clock() callback that is run from remove() >> to undo any allocation activities

Re: [PATCH v4 11/31] net: can: mscan: improve clock API use

2013-08-07 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
tch which adds some code there? If not, please remove. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions| Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917- | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 268

Re: [PATCH v4 11/31] net: can: mscan: improve clock API use

2013-08-07 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
goto exit_retcode; Why don't you add another jump label and jump to that to disable the ipkg clock? > + } > + } > + > /* common open */ > ret = open_candev(dev); > if (ret) > - return ret; > + goto e

Re: [PATCH v3 27/31] net: can: mscan: add common clock support for mpc512x

2013-07-23 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
ock() implementations). I think a one liner stating that the return value is the clock rate and "0" indicates is an invalid clock rate, this meaning an error here, is enough. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions| Ph

Re: [PATCH v3 11/31] net: can: mscan: improve clock API use

2013-07-23 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 07/23/2013 01:53 PM, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 14:31 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> >> On 07/22/2013 02:14 PM, Gerhard Sittig wrote: >>> the .get_clock() callback is run from probe() and might allocate >>> resources, introduce a .put_

Re: [PATCH v3 27/31] net: can: mscan: add common clock support for mpc512x

2013-07-22 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
gt; +} > + > +#else/* COMMON_CLK */ > + > struct mpc512x_clockctl { > u32 spmr; /* System PLL Mode Reg */ > u32 sccr[2];/* System Clk Ctrl Reg 1 & 2 */ > @@ -239,12 +400,18 @@ exit_put: > of_node_put(np_clock); > re

Re: [PATCH v3 11/31] net: can: mscan: improve clock API use

2013-07-22 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
call prepare_enable and disable_unprepare in the open/close functions. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions| Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917- | Amtsgericht Hild

Re: [PATCH v3 08/31] fs_enet: cleanup clock API use

2013-07-22 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
;s no need for devm_clk_put(), devm will take care of this. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions| Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917- | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HR

Re: [PATCH v2 16/24] net: can: mscan: make mpc512x code use common clock

2013-07-19 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 07/19/2013 11:41 AM, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 09:34 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> >> On 07/18/2013 10:20 PM, Gerhard Sittig wrote: >>> extend the mscan(4) driver with alternative support for the COMMON_CLK >>> approach which is an opt

Re: [PATCH v2 16/24] net: can: mscan: make mpc512x code use common clock

2013-07-19 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
LK_FROM_IPS: > + clk_can = clk_get(&ofdev->dev, "ips"); > + if (IS_ERR(clk_can)) > + goto err_notavail; > + clk_prepare_enable(clk_can); Where is the corresponding clk_disable_unprepare()?a > + freq_calc = clk_get_r

Re: [PATCH v2] can: flexcan: remove HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN Kconfig symbol

2013-06-01 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 06/01/2013 10:59 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 17 May 2013 10:59:17 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> This patch removes the Kconfig symbol HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN from >> arch/{arm,powerpc} >> and allowing compilation unconditionally on all arm and powerpc platforms. >&

Re: [PATCH v2] can: flexcan: remove HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN Kconfig symbol

2013-06-01 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 06/01/2013 01:40 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 18:06 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> On 05/17/2013 11:09 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: >>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:59:17AM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >>>> This patch removes the Kconfi

Re: [PATCH v2] can: flexcan: remove HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN Kconfig symbol

2013-05-20 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 05/17/2013 11:09 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:59:17AM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> This patch removes the Kconfig symbol HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN from >> arch/{arm,powerpc} >> and allowing compilation unconditionally on all arm and powerpc platforms

[PATCH v2] can: flexcan: remove HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN Kconfig symbol

2013-05-17 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
Cc: Kumar Gala Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300 Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde --- Changes since v1: - don't remove IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_FLEXCAN, which breaks non DT imx platforms tnx Shawn arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 4 arch/

Re: [PATCH] can: flexcan: allow compilation on arm and powerpc

2013-05-17 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 05/17/2013 04:03 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 03:42:36PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> This patch removes the Kconfig symbols HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN and >> IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_FLEXCAN from arch/{arm,powerpc} and allowing compilation on &

[PATCH] can: flexcan: allow compilation on arm and powerpc

2013-05-16 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
Cc: Kumar Gala Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300 Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde --- Hello, if the arm and powerpc people are okay with this, I'm taking this patch (and then will go upstream via David Miller's net-next). re

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] usb: fsl-mxc-udc: replace cpu_is_xxx() with platform_device_id

2013-01-14 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
same is unnecessary. > > b) you can't be expecting to add future SoCs support to fsl udc, I have > already said and will repeat for the last time: move to chipidea ASAP. > > New SoCs cannot be added to fsl udc, you *must* use chipidea for > anything new and move th

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] usb: fsl-mxc-udc: replace cpu_is_xxx() with platform_device_id

2013-01-14 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 01/14/2013 11:53 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:50:41AM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> On 01/14/2013 11:39 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:34:05AM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >>>> On 01/14/2013 11

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] usb: fsl-mxc-udc: replace cpu_is_xxx() with platform_device_id

2013-01-14 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 01/14/2013 11:39 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:34:05AM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> On 01/14/2013 11:24 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >>>> On 01/14/2013 11:16 AM

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] usb: fsl-mxc-udc: replace cpu_is_xxx() with platform_device_id

2013-01-14 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 01/14/2013 11:24 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> On 01/14/2013 11:16 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 06:12:39PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: >>>> @@ -2

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] usb: fsl-mxc-udc: replace cpu_is_xxx() with platform_device_id

2013-01-14 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
driver_data = IMX51_UDC, >> +} >> +}; > > I wonder if your driver-data is actually needed since you can use string > comparisson to achieve the exact same outcome. Why use a string compare, if the kernel infrastructure already does this for you? Marc -- Pengutro

Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] can: cc770: add platform bus driver for the CC770 and AN82527

2011-11-28 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
ppc-...@ozlabs.org > CC: Kumar Gala > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger See comment in the _remove function. Otherwise good. Add my: Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/cc770.txt | 56 > drivers/net/can/cc770/Kconfig

Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] flexcan: Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010)

2011-10-18 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
flexcan core, too please ;) cheers, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions| Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917- | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix

Re: [PATCH v12 3/6] flexcan: Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.

2011-08-15 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
r resolution on the fsl,flexcan > name later, we can update the documentation and driver then? cheers, Marc [1] http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v3.0.1/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c#L871 -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions| Phone: +49-

Re: [PATCH v11 5/6] flexcan: Prefer device tree clock frequency if available.

2011-08-11 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
he flexcan device. nitpicking follows inline: > Signed-off-by: Robin Holt > To: Kumar Gala > To: Wolfgang Grandegger , > To: Marc Kleine-Budde , > To: U Bhaskar-B22300 > To: Scott Wood > To: Grant Likely > Cc: socketcan-c...@lists.berlios.de, > Cc: net...@vger.kerne

Re: [PATCH v10 0/5] [flexcan/powerpc] Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010)

2011-08-10 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
atible string for the > fsl,p1010_flexcan. This patch series is working on phytec's pcm043 (mx35) based on current net-next. Feel free to add my Acked-by to all patches. good work, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutio

Re: [PATCH v10 0/5] [flexcan/powerpc] Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010)

2011-08-10 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 08/10/2011 12:11 PM, Robin Holt wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:01:58PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> On 08/10/2011 05:05 AM, Robin Holt wrote: >>> With all the patches applied, my p1010rdb works for communicating between >>> its two can ports and also can c

Re: [PATCH v10 0/5] [flexcan/powerpc] Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010)

2011-08-10 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
atible string for the > fsl,p1010_flexcan. One remark for the subjects. It seems no one is using "[$subsystem]" anymore, but rather "$subsystem:". cheers, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions| Phon

Re: [PATCH v10 4/5] [powerpc] Add flexcan device support for p1010rdb.

2011-08-10 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 08/10/2011 05:06 AM, Robin Holt wrote: > I added a simple clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver > could determine a clock frequency. The p1010 can device only has an > oscillator of system bus frequency divided by 2. > > Signed-off-by: Robin Holt > Acked-by:

Re: [PATCH 4/4] [powerpc] Add flexcan device support for p1010rdb.

2011-08-09 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
l work for P1010 ?? > > It appears that the of_device stuff got moved under the struct device > and that allows the request_irq() to just magically work. cool :) Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions| Phone: +4

Re: [RFC 4/4] [powerpc] Add flexcan device support for p1010rdb.

2011-08-09 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 08/09/2011 02:40 PM, Robin Holt wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 02:33:31PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> On 08/09/2011 07:55 AM, Robin Holt wrote: >>> I added a clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver >>> could find its clock frequency. >&g

Re: [RFC 4/4] [powerpc] Add flexcan device support for p1010rdb.

2011-08-09 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 08/09/2011 07:55 AM, Robin Holt wrote: > I added a clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver > could find its clock frequency. > > Signed-off-by: Robin Holt > To: Marc Kleine-Budde , > To: Wolfgang Grandegger , > To: U Bhaskar-B22300 > Cc: socketcan-c...@lis

Re: [RFC 4/4] [powerpc] Add flexcan device support for p1010rdb.

2011-08-09 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
rrect, this would be an error of 0.01%. But the fsl code rounds to closest KHz. Rounding introduces errors in most of the cases. IMHO it's better not to round here. For example the usual at91can is clocked with 99.532800 MHz, this is a least the value the arm clock framework reports. Che

Re: [RFC 4/4] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.

2011-08-08 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 08/08/2011 10:49 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > On 08/06/2011 10:59 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: >> >> On Aug 6, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Robin Holt wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 11:52:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >>>> >>>> On Aug 6, 2011, at

Re: [RFC 4/4] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.

2011-08-06 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
+ p1010_rdb_clk_init(); > +} > + > static struct of_device_id __initdata p1010rdb_ids[] = { > { .type = "soc", }, > { .compatible = "soc", }, > @@ -195,6 +272,7 @@ define_machine(p1010_rdb) { > .name = "P1010 RDB"

Re: Image generation for Efika is broken in 2.6.26

2008-06-11 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
utils 2.17? It has a bug that was triggered by the p_paddr > change. Do you get a bunch of warnings from the strip command? Same problem here with binutils-2.17. But no warnings from strip. Can you give me some pointers to the original bug report or the fix of the problem in the binutils sv

Re: Image generation for Efika is broken in 2.6.26

2008-06-11 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
>> 2.18. That fixed the Efika problem. Thanks for the tip. > > Marc, do we have a fix for that 2.17 problem? No, I just have heard yesterday that there is a problem, but have not seen any further details (I'm not reading this list). Is there a fix w/o update binutils to 2.18? Ma