On 07/03/2014 04:23 AM, Zhao Qiang wrote: > when flexcan is not physically linked, command 'cantest' will > trigger an err_irq, add err_irq handler for it. > > Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang <b45...@freescale.com> > --- > Changes for v2: > - use a space instead of tab > - use flexcan_poll_state instead of print > Changes for v3: > - return IRQ_HANDLED if err is triggered > - stop transmitted packets when there is an err_interrupt > Changes for v4: > - call flexcan_irq > Changes for v5: > - move err_int_handling code from flexcan_irq to flexcan_err_irq > - call flexcan_err_irq from flexcan_irq
Why do you move the RX IRQ handling into the error IRQ function? If I understand you correctly you only want to do error interrupt handling the error IRQ function, right? Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
