PT7C4338 chip is being manufactured by Pericom Technology Inc.
It is a serial real-time clock which provides:
1)Low-power clock/calendar.
2)Programmable square-wave output.
It has 56 bytes of nonvolatile RAM.
Its register set is same as that of rtc device: DS1307.
Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain
--
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:08:55PM +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is version 2 of the patch
>
> Changes from Version 1 :
> : Changed the interface for read_memory_region_limits to use 'int fd'
> instead of FILE*.
> : Use sizeof(variable) for read(, instead of sizeof(type).
>
On 15.06.2011 [15:02:18 -0500], Brian King wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 02:17 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > From what I can tell, the only place that explicitly clears the FROZEN
> > flag is the error-handling code via ata_eh_thaw_port().
> >
> > So I thought either we're not invoking the error-han
On 06/15/2011 02:17 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> From what I can tell, the only place that explicitly clears the FROZEN
> flag is the error-handling code via ata_eh_thaw_port().
>
> So I thought either we're not invoking the error-handler at probe time
> correctly to kick the port or perhaps t
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:11:55 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:43 +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
> > On 06/14/11 17:34, Michal Simek wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?
> > As Josh, mentioned, I will be working on thi
Hi Jeff,
It appears that commit 7b3a24c57d2eeda8dba9c205342b12689c4679f9 broke
CD-ROMs on the IPR SATA bus on powerpc machines:
ata_port_alloc: ENTER
ata_port_probe: ata1: bus probe begin
ata1.00: ata_dev_read_id: ENTER
ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x40)
ata1.00: ata_dev_
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
> On 06/15/11 15:41, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:43 +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/14/11 17:34, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>
Hi,
have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 08:08:05AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 12:47 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >>
> >> OK, serial-8250 is clearly just plain wrong, since the 8250 series UARTs
> >> are ubiquitous across just about every platform.
> >>
> >> Floppy is special (in the shor
The audit system previously expected arches calling to audit_syscall_exit to
supply as arguments if the syscall was a success and what the return code was.
Audit also provides a helper AUDITSC_RESULT which was supposed to simplify
things
by converting from negative retcodes to an audit internal ma
On 06/15/2011 12:39 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:31:27PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 06/14/2011 03:08 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>>> I took a look at the back of all my ia64 systems - none of them
>>> have a parallel port. It seems unlikely that new systems wi
On 06/15/2011 12:47 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>
>> OK, serial-8250 is clearly just plain wrong, since the 8250 series UARTs
>> are ubiquitous across just about every platform.
>>
>> Floppy is special (in the short bus sense), since it is closely tied to
>> ISA DMA. Conditionalizing this
Priyanka Jain wrote:
> config RTC_DRV_DS1307
> - tristate "Dallas/Maxim DS1307/37/38/39/40, ST M41T00, EPSON RX-8025"
> + tristate "Dallas/Maxim DS1307/37/38/39/40, ST M41T00, EPSON RX-8025,
> PT7C4338"
> help
> If you say yes here you get support for various compatible RTC
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:34:37AM -0400, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:18:36PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > On 06/14/2011 03:34 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > >
> > > There is no point in offering to build something that couldn't possibly be
> > > used. It just makes the k
On 06/15/11 15:41, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:43 +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
On 06/14/11 17:34, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?
As Josh, mentioned, I will be working on this. In fact I was trying a couple of
patc
Priyanka Jain wrote:
> + * Copyright (C) 2011 Priyanka Jain (priyanka.j...@freescale.com)
> + * (pt7c4338 support)
You can't claim copyright just by adding one line of text.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
_
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> * In case of floppies, the "solution" was to write a driver for every
> platform that
> doesn't have PIO, since they tend to have other differences. The amiflop and
> ataflop drivers are not even use readb(), they just derefence volatile
>
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 10:30 +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > The PPC440X currently uses 256M TLB entries to pin the
> > lowmem. When we go for a relocatable kernel we have to :
> >
> > 1) Restrict the kernel load address to be 256M aligned
> >
> > OR
> >
> > 2) Use 16M TLB(the next possible TLB p
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:43 +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
> On 06/14/11 17:34, Michal Simek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?
> As Josh, mentioned, I will be working on this. In fact I was trying a couple
> of
> patches towards this on PPC440x. But,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:30 AM, David Laight wrote:
>
> > The PPC440X currently uses 256M TLB entries to pin the
> > lowmem. When we go for a relocatable kernel we have to :
> >
> > 1) Restrict the kernel load address to be 256M aligned
> >
> > OR
> >
> > 2) Use 16M TLB(the next possible TLB pag
On Wednesday 15 June 2011, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 06/14/2011 02:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>
> >> Why on earth restrict it like that? It's just a device driver, like
> >> more or less any other device driver...
> >
> > I'd say any other classic ISA/PC driver, including floppy, gameport or
> The PPC440X currently uses 256M TLB entries to pin the
> lowmem. When we go for a relocatable kernel we have to :
>
> 1) Restrict the kernel load address to be 256M aligned
>
> OR
>
> 2) Use 16M TLB(the next possible TLB page size supported)
> entries till the first
> 256M and then use the
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:18:36PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 06/14/2011 03:34 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> >
> > There is no point in offering to build something that couldn't possibly be
> > used. It just makes the kernel harder to configure and inflates the test
> > matrix for no good rea
Dan Malek wrote on 2011/06/14 20:11:18:
>
> Hi Joakim.
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> > I don't have a mpc850, do you?
>
> I have to say I do :-)
>
> > Probably but that is another matter. You could continue with that
> > if you like but I am stopping here ATM.
>
> O
PT7C4338 chip is being manufactured by Pericom Technology Inc.
It is a serial real-time clock which provides:
1)Low-power clock/calendar.
2)Programmable square-wave output.
It has 56 bytes of nonvolatile RAM.
Its register set is same as that of rtc device: DS1307.
Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain
--
2011/6/15 Arnd Bergmann
>
> > config SCORE
> > - def_bool y
> > - select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
> > - select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
> > + def_bool y
> > + select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
> > + select HAVE_PC_PARPORT
> > + select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
> >
> > choice
> > p
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:31:27PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 06/14/2011 03:08 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > I took a look at the back of all my ia64 systems - none of them
> > have a parallel port. It seems unlikely that new systems will
> > start adding parallel ports :-)
> >
> > So even if
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:30:47PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 06/14/2011 02:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>
> >> Why on earth restrict it like that? It's just a device driver, like
> >> more or less any other device driver...
> >
> > I'd say any other classic ISA/PC driver, including flop
Willy Tarreau wrote on 2011/06/14 21:31:06:
>
> Hi Joakim,
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 03:54:45PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU
> > bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB
> > error caused by dcbX and icbi insns
Joakim Tjernlund/Transmode wrote on 2011/06/14 20:00:09:
> From: Joakim Tjernlund/Transmode
>
> Dan Malek wrote on 2011/06/14 18:06:45:
> >
> >
> > Hi Joakim.
> >
> > On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >
> > > Various kernel asm modifies SRR0/SRR1 just before executing
> > > a
29 matches
Mail list logo
