On 06/15/11 15:41, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:43 +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
On 06/14/11 17:34, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?
As Josh, mentioned, I will be working on this. In fact I was trying a couple of
patches towards this on PPC440x. But, I am stuck in debugging the hang that I am
experiencing with the changes. I am setting up a RISCWatch processor probe to
debug the same.
Here is some information that I wanted to share :
The PPC440X currently uses 256M TLB entries to pin the lowmem. When we go for a
relocatable kernel we have to :
1) Restrict the kernel load address to be 256M aligned
Wait a minute ... :-)
There's a difference between having the kernel run from any address and
mapping the linear mapping not starting at 0.
Those are completely orthogonal.
I don't see why off hand you are changing the way the TLB is used.
I started off with PHYSICAL_START support and that kind of hogged me into
this approach :-).
The
only possible change needed is to make sure the initial bolted entry set
by the asm code properly covers the kernel in whatever it's "current"
location is. The rest is a matter of fixing up the relocations...
Could we do something like,
If kernel is loaded at X,
1. map : ((X-1) & ~256M) to PAGE_OFFSET and so on to cover the kernel in 256M
chunks.
2. Then process the relocations with (X % 256M)
Thanks
Suzuki
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
