Noam Rathaus wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for an option to tell Lilo to boot a certain kernel ONCE, and if
it fails - to revert (after the reboot) to the previous one.
Is this possible?
lilo -D override_default
lilo -R the_command_line_to_run_once
So, after upgrade on a remote machine, the
Noam,
The problem is, that (if I recall correctly) nothing there is telling
lilo that it "failed". LILO just passes the parameters to the kernel,
loads the kernel etc and boots them.
If your kernel can load a shell and mount the /boot partition, then
you can write a simple scri
lilo -r is only good to change root directory.
Hetz
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Noam Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I recall, it was "lilo -r "
> Haven't used lilo for several years now (and I was a late adopter...)
>
> - Noam
&
Hi,
As far as I recall, it was "lilo -r "
Haven't used lilo for several years now (and I was a late adopter...)
- Noam
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Noam Rathaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for an option to tell Lilo to boot a certain ke
Hi,
I am looking for an option to tell Lilo to boot a certain kernel ONCE, and if
it fails - to revert (after the reboot) to the previous one.
Is this possible?
--
Noam Rathaus
CTO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.beyondsecurity.com
"Know that you are safe."
Beyond Security Finali
Good day.
Is is a way to configure grub to boot after specified
timeout, no matter what user press on the keyboard ?
I.e make grub behave like lilo with "timeout"
parameter.
Grub's timeout as long as i see is like lilo&#
You can make the kernel default and then if you don't like it change
it. It's not very hard to change the default kernel (I would use
boot-admin).
To unsubscribe,
send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the mess
Ira Abramov wrote:
"just have to" is not good enough. not documented enough, and what's
with having to learn yet another commandline with non-standard disk
enumeration and partition numbering? this MAY be excellent for someone
who uses it daily maybe but I need it only once every few weeks or
#x27;s
> with having to learn yet another commandline with non-standard disk
> enumeration and partition numbering?
What's the equivalent with lilo?
> this MAY be excellent for someone
> who uses it daily maybe but I need it only once every few weeks or
> months, Muggles wi
dure is crual and unusual, not to mention
> the odd configuration that may or may not follow :)
Noone forces you to use grub. Use lilo.
Just a small note - grub2 is in active development. That's probably
the main reason that grub isn't very well maintained. You might want
to try grub
Quoting Alex Alexander, from the post of Sun, 22 May:
>
> Grub worked fine for me on a RAID-1 dual SATA machine.
>
> Debian Installer (RC3 - pre-final) installed grub on the first drive
> and the machine boots like a charm. You just have to
>
> grub
> root (hd1,0)
> setup (hd1)
>
> to make the
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Quoting Shachar Shemesh, from the post of Sat, 21 May:
1. LILO allows booting from software RAID-1 partitions in a fault
tolerant way.
2. LILO allows the "-R" option, where you select the next kern
On 21 May 2005 20:06:49 +, Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Quoting Shachar Shemesh, from the post of Sat, 21 May:
> > > 1. LILO allows booting from software RAID-1 partitions in a fault
> > >
Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Shachar Shemesh, from the post of Sat, 21 May:
> > 1. LILO allows booting from software RAID-1 partitions in a fault
> > tolerant way.
> > 2. LILO allows the "-R" option, where you select the next kernel t
Quoting Shachar Shemesh, from the post of Sat, 21 May:
> Ira Abramov wrote:
>
> >I have two must-have features in LILO that grub doesn't do at the
> >moment.
> >
> I know of two, that may or may not be the two you are referring to too.
>
> 1. LILO allows b
Ira Abramov wrote:
I have two must-have features in LILO that grub doesn't do at the
moment.
I know of two, that may or may not be the two you are referring to too.
1. LILO allows booting from software RAID-1 partitions in a fault
tolerant way.
2. LILO allows the "-R" op
Ori Idan wrote:
shimi wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 16:07 +0300, Ori Idan wrote:
I installed debian on an IBM thinkpad with LILO as it's boot loader,
when LILO starts is says: Loading Linux and then draws dots for few
seconds and then says BIOS check successfull and start to ac
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:47AM +0300, Ira Abramov wrote:
> Quoting Amos Shapira, from the post of Sat, 21 May:
>
> > GRUB is so much better than what I remember from LILO.
>
> I have two must-have features in LILO that grub doesn't do at the
> moment. with all its g
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 10:04 +0300, Ira Abramov wrote:
> Quoting Amos Shapira, from the post of Sat, 21 May:
>
> > GRUB is so much better than what I remember from LILO.
>
> I have two must-have features in LILO that grub doesn't do at the
> moment. with all its glori
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:47AM +0300, Ira Abramov wrote:
> Quoting Amos Shapira, from the post of Sat, 21 May:
>
> > GRUB is so much better than what I remember from LILO.
>
> I have two must-have features in LILO that grub doesn't do at the
> moment. with all its g
Quoting Amos Shapira, from the post of Sat, 21 May:
> GRUB is so much better than what I remember from LILO.
I have two must-have features in LILO that grub doesn't do at the
moment. with all its glorified feature set, it's not easy to figure out
the install process either. the b
with.
Leave yourself a back door in case you mess things up and do
the change. What happened to the "let's learn new stuff" spirit?
GRUB is so much better than what I remember from LILO.
Cheers,
--Amos
To unsubscrib
shimi wrote:
>On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 16:07 +0300, Ori Idan wrote:
>
>
>>I installed debian on an IBM thinkpad with LILO as it's boot loader,
>>when LILO starts is says: Loading Linux and then draws dots for few
>>seconds and then says BIOS check successfull and st
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 16:07 +0300, Ori Idan wrote:
> I installed debian on an IBM thinkpad with LILO as it's boot loader,
> when LILO starts is says: Loading Linux and then draws dots for few
> seconds and then says BIOS check successfull and start to actualy load
> the kernel.
&g
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 16:07 +0300, Ori Idan wrote:
> I installed debian on an IBM thinkpad with LILO as it's boot loader,
> when LILO starts is says: Loading Linux and then draws dots for few
> seconds and then says BIOS check successfull and start to actualy load
> the kernel.
&g
I installed debian on an IBM thinkpad with LILO as it's boot loader,
when LILO starts is says: Loading Linux and then draws dots for few
seconds and then says BIOS check successfull and start to actualy load
the kernel.
Is there a way to shorten the time it draws these dots?
What is this
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 03:10:00PM +0300, ik wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I wish to boot a CD with Linux inside on an old computer (P120 MHz), where
> the motherboard (contain an old Award version of BIOS) does not have "Boot
> from CD" option. I thought to hack it using L
I wish to boot a CD with Linux inside on an old computer (P120 MHz), where the
> > motherboard (contain
> > an old Award version of BIOS) does not have "Boot from CD" option. I thought to
> > hack it using LILO,
> > and make it call the book-able CD, but I'
ello list,
>
> I wish to boot a CD with Linux inside on an old computer (P120 MHz), where the
> motherboard (contain
> an old Award version of BIOS) does not have "Boot from CD" option. I thought to hack
> it using LILO,
> and make it call the book-able CD, but I
Hello list,
I wish to boot a CD with Linux inside on an old computer (P120 MHz), where the motherboard (contain
an old Award version of BIOS) does not have "Boot from CD" option. I thought to hack it using LILO,
and make it call the book-able CD, but I'm unable to do so, be
Ok, here is my take on the matter:
First of all, if unattended kernel replacements or RAID root FS are not
important to you, GRUB gobbles up LILO any day of the week. It is faster
to load, more resiliant to configuration errors, and more secure when
you try to lock down the config using boot
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Ira Abramov wrote:
> > > I'm not going to install LILO - period. Since the rest of my family uses
> > > Windows, there's no point in booting Linux not through it.
>
> Shlomi, you're a grown boy, get yourself your own machine maybe? :-
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Schlomo Schapiro wrote:
> Best solution:
> Install Lilo, boot into linux by default, start X and VMWare with the
> original Windows.
all is nice and dandy, BUT... there's the question of the cost of a
VMWare license (I have a serious intention of using my s
Best solution:
Install Lilo, boot into linux by default, start X and VMWare with the
original Windows.
They get Windows, you get Linux (e.g. X on another VC), nobody has to
reboot any more and, best of all, you'll get a faster computer after your
father complains that the system got slower
e to boot it instead.
> >
> > My father would kill me if I'll replace the Win98's MBR boot loader with
> > LILO, so I'm using loadlin.
>
> why? just set up LILO to time-out after 3 seconds, and boot into windows
> by default - your father won't notice any d
l replace the Win98's MBR boot loader with
> LILO, so I'm using loadlin.
why? just set up LILO to time-out after 3 seconds, and boot into windows
by default - your father won't notice any difference - just tell him to
press ENTER if he sees 'LILO:' on the screen for more th
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Omer Zak wrote:
> Hello Shlomi,
> 1. How did you invoke lilo (the program) to create the boot diskette?
I "su"'ed into root and typed "/sbin/lilo -c" at the command line.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
> 2. In my PC, disabling an hard d
Hello Shlomi,
1. How did you invoke lilo (the program) to create the boot diskette?
2. In my PC, disabling an hard disk from the BIOS does not prevent Linux
from working with it, once it has already booted. YMMV (with other
computer brands), however
Hi and Shabat Shalom.
I installed kernel 2.4.16.11mdk (from Mandrake Cooker) on my Linux
installation. It did not replace the old kernel but rather I have both
version installed. I'd like to boot it instead.
My father would kill me if I'll replace the Win98's MBR boot loader wi
ns of it since the BIOS gives each disk a
number usually starting with 0x80 but it seems each BIOS runs a
different sequense of numbers, lilo is now installed on /dev/hda (doesnt
work on /dev/hdd) and loads just fine - linux and Win2K.
Regarding Win2k, i'm still having the same problem, when
Just out of curiosity .. do you have the linux hd configured as a
SECONDARY slave without a master?
-= Miles Teg -=- Understanding kills ambition; Dominance? Submission! =-
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
th
> well, I tried it
with values 0x81 and 0x80 I got the same results.
thanks :)
any other ideas ?
>
> In my experience, lilo is the most (or only) difficult part of linux
> installation.
>
> But if you want help, you need to provide information, how many disks,
> h
SS).
> the 2nd HD was a PS but it had the same results
> i say again, under Win2k without the 2nd HD everything is working fine.
>
> lilo.conf is pretty standard ...i attach it here.
> The problem is not only with liloi can always load it like i am now, using a
>floppy.
&
again, under Win2k without the 2nd HD everything is working fine.
lilo.conf is pretty standard ...i attach it here.
The problem is not only with liloi can always load it like i am now, using a
floppy.
the problem is larger, when the 2nd HD is in the whole machine doesnt work like it
should
lems before (With Win2K or linux)?
In my experience, lilo is the most (or only) difficult part of linux
installation.
But if you want help, you need to provide information, how many disks,
how are they connected, how are they partitioned, content of lilo.conf.
--
Matan Ziv-Av.
Ok.
I downgraded my bios from P17 to P15...meaning two generations, dating a
year back...
still the same results.
This is stopping to be interesting and begins to be annoying.
I'de love to hear any ideas.
Has anyone had these problems before (With Win2K or linux)?
and if so how were they solved?
Basically what it means is that my BIOS has problems with the HD's...
I just upgraded to the latest version of my bios, it solved a few
problems i had before (liek it not being able to boot from CD)..
If it is true then I have to downgrade the bios... which is an
interesting task on its own...
A
is a 15GB disk with
Win2K which after startup with the second HD inside crashes with error
0x001e ...which is common for most serious mircojunk bugs.
2. After finishing the installation of the linux system it says it
cannot write the lilo to /dev/hda (the boot partition on the master
disk) and
)
lable=Windows
tables=/dev/hda
and don't forget to run "lilo" after you rewrite the "lilo.conf".
good luck
Tomer.
- Original Message -
From: "Erez Boym" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Linux-IL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Hi,
I have a problem loading Win2K with Lilo.
I have installed Win2k and Red hat 6.0 on the same
machine. The comp. used to be used by both me and my
partner, which knows only MSOffice, and to make things
easier for her I had removed Lilo by using fdisk /MBR.
So whenever I'm using the co
hi all,
I'm having a problem loading windows on a hdb2 partition.
I have a suse 7.1 on hda
Hdb has 3 primary partitions, and when i load with lilo to hdb2 it
hides my other 2 partitions ( hdb1, hdb3 ) - both are FAT32
my lilo
Hello
I tried to install lilo on a new red hat 7 instalation.
I tried to istall it on a 15 meg hda2 /boot, located after a 16 gig
windows
partition (which I can't move/remove etc.).
I got an error (which coresponded to a comment during the installation
formating stage) which said that
Hi
use the option 'lba32' in your lilo.conf. Works like a charm.
didi
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 09:10:59PM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> Hello
>
> I tried to install lilo on a new red hat 7 instalation.
> I tried to istall it on a 15 meg hda2 /boot, located
Hello
I tried to install lilo on a new red hat 7 instalation.
I tried to istall it on a 15 meg hda2 /boot, located after a 16 gig windows
partition (which I can't move/remove etc.).
I got an error (which coresponded to a comment during the installation
formating stage) which said that
llo
>
> I have installed VMWare on my Linux (host). There are 2 seprate HDs on this
> system. I have created raw disks to install the guest OSs. Win98 is installed
> as a guest OS on one raw disk (/dev/hda5).
>
> The problem now is with LILO. I have
. Win98 is installed
as a guest OS on one raw disk (/dev/hda5).
The problem now is with LILO. I have installed LILO on my /dev/hda MBR. Each
time I power on the VMWare, it goes to the LILO prompt. So I modified the
lilo.conf to provide Win98 as an option. At the VMWare LILO prompt I select
Win98 and
slave, with lilo on the
primary-master, and to boot windows I use this entry:
other = /dev/hdb1
label = w
loader = /boot/chain.b
table = /dev/hdb
map-drive = 0x80
to = 0x81
map-drive = 0x81
I didn't quite understand what you mean by "manually done".
We tried configuring LILO with the yast tool which comes with
SUSE, but it just screwed everything up, and we had to use the backup file
we created.
Manor Gelber wrote:
was
this manually done?he should try
confingu
The lilo doens't seem to do any problem when I run it.
And, yes, I tried the manuals.
Shaul Karl wrote:
1) What output are you getting when you run lilo?
2) Perhaps lilo docs can help you more?
Name: 31
1) What output are you getting when you run lilo?
2) Perhaps lilo docs can help you more?
-- Attached file included as plaintext by Listar --
-- File: 31
-- Desc: 31
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Mon Sep 25 23:37:25 2000
Envelope-to: shaul@localhost
Received: from localhost
Hello,
About two weeks ago I sent a question requesting help dealing with LILO
for a friend. I didn't quite get an answer for my problem, probably because
i didn't send the "lilo.conf" file (mainly because i didn't have it on
my computer).
Anyway, now I sent both
i have tryed doing this and installed it on the linux root patition by still
with no use.
- Original Message -
From: Oren Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: adi schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ilug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2000 11:04 PM
Subject: Re:
16, 2000 7:54
PM
Subject: lilo cause a virus warning
hii
whan i use the virus protection option on my bios
i get a virus warning when i use lilo
this must be because lilo changes the mbr
is there any thing to do rether then disabeling
the protection option ?
Hello Adi!
You can install lilo not on your mbr, but on a specific partition of your
harddrive, which you must make bootable.
I also don't think that the bios virus protection is that good, though
I don't guarantee this.. I would disable it, if I were you, and use a
normal anti-v
hii
whan i use the virus protection option on my bios i
get a virus warning when i use lilo
this must be because lilo changes the mbr
is there any thing to do rether then disabeling the
protection option ?
--msBD9D39DF2AB1F6918C46AF44
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=x-user-defined
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
hi
as far as i can see the problem IS on the linux side. unless instead of
directing the lilo to boot windows from /dev/sda1 i'm supposed to direct
to /dev/sda (the MBR)
lain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Hi!
> I'm posting this message for a friend.
> I'll start with the symptom:
> when he boots the computer and lilo starts he has options for both
> windows and linux, but he can only start linux. when he types &#x
--ms85305C5E3329ACFFE88543A7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi!
I'm posting this message for a friend.
I'll start with the symptom:
when he boots the computer and lilo starts he has options for both
windows and linux, but he can
tc/fstab and lilo.conf to reflect the changes
> 3. reboot with the same method as (1), but this time use
> root=/dev/ to get the root system to what you wnat
> 4. run lilo
>
> Matti
>
That sounds too simple. I hope that's all, I should have thought about it
already, but you know wh
lilo
Matti
At 02:30 AM 20/7/00 +0200, you wrote:
>Assume that I put it back as hdd so I could change some settings files,
>what should
>I change? I assume I should start with /etc/fstab, but what's more?
=
To unsubscr
--msD2965E75749169AE074FBF6A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Well, I tried to follow the idea Schlomo Schapiro gave, about connecting my
secondary slave HD as a master, but the problem is like this:
I need to boot into linux, which till now (
Hi all
I just want to say what my friend had a problem with
incorrect set jumpers. He lived happily with WIN,
but when we tried to install Linux on his machine, installation was
halting somewhere during rpm-s installing (it was RH6.0)
I was very surprised what setting jumpers SOLVED the probl
ded Space:
> > the first partition is Linux Swap. The second is Ext2 (just 8MB) which is for
> > "/boot"
> > and the last one is Ext2 which is "/"
> >
> > Now, here is my lilo.conf file attached.
> > 10x for your help. :)
> >
> > --
>
--ms33D029696CC3C7A2BD7C4A5A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Shaul Karl wrote:
> You still seems to have a "Secondary Slave" without a "Secondary Master".
> It is not working and Matan has point out that it is contrary to the spec.
> Further
Ext2 which is "/"
>
> Now, here is my lilo.conf file attached.
> 10x for your help. :)
>
> --
> Noam Meltzer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ICQ: 4853872
>
>
>
> -- Attached file included as plaintext by Listar --
>
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
Just a wild guess, but maybe the "linear" doesn't jive with the way the
BIOS sees the HD - so it can't read your /boot
Matti
At 01:32 AM 17/7/00 +0200, you wrote:
># LILO Konfigurations-Datei
># Start LILO global Section
># If you want to prevent console user
lp. :)
--
Noam Meltzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 4853872
-- Attached file included as plaintext by Listar --
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="lilo.conf"
# LILO Konfigurations-Datei
# Start LILO global Section
# If you want to prevent console user
> I do not know if it is that you simply did not mention it or that you really
> did not do it.
> Do not you have to change the secondary slave jumper from slave to master when
> making such a change? Perhaps some BIOS reconfiguration is required? Does
> Windows can see all your HDs
Having a sla
to disconnect one of
> > the HD - the Secondary Master. The other drives stayed just how they
> > were defined.
> > Now when I booted my machine I discovered that instead of LILO I get a
> > nonstopping 01 (or was it 10, i can't remember now) with spaces between
>
>
ry Slave
> The CD is Primary Slave
> I have aSuse 6.4 (kernel 2.2.14)
> Now everything was working just fine until I had to disconnect one of
> the HD - the Secondary Master. The other drives stayed just how they
> were defined.
> Now when I booted my machine I discovered that in
rking just fine until I had to disconnect one of
the HD - the Secondary Master. The other drives stayed just how they
were defined.
Now when I booted my machine I discovered that instead of LILO I get a
nonstopping 01 (or was it 10, i can't remember now) with spaces between
each pair. Anyway,
just fine until I had to disconnect one of
> > the HD - the Secondary Master. The other drives stayed just how they
> > were defined.
>
> (And I understand that /boot was not on it)
>
> > Now when I booted my machine I discovered that instead of LILO I get a
> > no
ter. The other drives stayed just how they
> were defined.
> Now when I booted my machine I discovered that instead of LILO I get a
> nonstopping 01 (or was it 10, i can't remember now) with spaces between
01 usually means disk does not exist. Probably lilo tries to access
something
> The CD is Primary Slave
> I have aSuse 6.4 (kernel 2.2.14)
> Now everything was working just fine until I had to disconnect one of
> the HD - the Secondary Master. The other drives stayed just how they
> were defined.
(And I understand that /boot was not on it)
> Now when I boot
rking just fine until I had to disconnect one of
the HD - the Secondary Master. The other drives stayed just how they
were defined.
Now when I booted my machine I discovered that instead of LILO I get a
nonstopping 01 (or was it 10, i can't remember now) with spaces between
each pair. Anyway,
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 05:09:15PM +0300, Ely Levy wrote:
> Lilo or any other booter for that matter can load from after the 1024
> cylinder (about 8 gig) limit make the boot partition before..
IIRC, GRUB can do that. Never used it though. I think it actually
reads the filesystem witho
Lilo or any other booter for that matter can load from after the 1024
cylinder (about 8 gig) limit make the boot partition before..
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Marc A. Volovic wrote:
| Alex Dukhan wrote:
|
| > Does anyone know about
Thanks to all for your precious help.
I create a small partition and install the /boot on it.
It Works.
Thanks.
Alex.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message
Alex Dukhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone know about any problems with installing lilo on 20 GB disk ( >
> 1024 cylinder ).
> I'm trying to install lilo on the MBR and when installing , it keeps telling
> me "cannot install lilo > 1024 cylinder&q
"Marc A. Volovic" wrote:
>
> Alex Dukhan wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know about any problems with installing lilo on 20 GB disk
> > ( > 1024 cylinder ).
> > I'm trying to install lilo on the MBR and when installing , it keeps
> > telling me &qu
From: Alex Dukhan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 17:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lilo & > 1024 Cylinder Disk.
Does anyone know about any problems with installing lilo on 20 GB disk ( >
1024 cylinder ).
I'm trying to install lilo on the MBR and w
Title: Lilo & > 1024 Cylinder Disk.
Does anyone know about any problems with installing lilo on 20 GB disk ( > 1024 cylinder ).
I'm trying to install lilo on the MBR and when installing , it keeps telling me "cannot install lilo > 1024 cylinder" and doesn'
I installed RedHat 6.0 in a new partition. my computer, P266 Win98 + Win95
has a multiboot program (BOOTSTAR) that allows me to choose what partition/
disk to boot. The installation was OK , RedHat came to life , Gnome
interface and all. But now I can not boot to Linux. LILO goes to booting
lvier.
:
:Omer wrote:
:
:> On Sat, 5 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:>
:> :Hey,
:> :
:> :i've just reinstalled slackware 4.0 (dont ask why) all went good, but
:> :when i got to the lilo part it told me he cant install lilo (after i
:> :chose an 'MBR lilo' install) ,
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Hey,
:
:i've just reinstalled slackware 4.0 (dont ask why) all went good, but
:when i got to the lilo part it told me he cant install lilo (after i
:chose an 'MBR lilo' install) , so i did a 'floppy lilo' install and
:thought
1) Sending your lilo.conf to the list might help.
2) Does your lilo.conf includes
boot=/dev/hda
or
boot=/dev/hda2
?
That is, does lilo wrote its data on the mbr or somewhere else (or
is it me who is mixing up the details?)
3) Lilo docs are
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey,
>
> i've just reinstalled slackware 4.0 (dont ask why) all went good, but
> when i got to the lilo part it told me he cant install lilo (after i
> chose an 'MBR lilo' install) , so i did a 'floppy lilo'
Hey,
i've just reinstalled slackware 4.0 (dont ask why) all went good, but
when i got to the lilo part it told me he cant install lilo (after i
chose an 'MBR lilo' install) , so i did a 'floppy lilo' install and
thought every thing shuld be oaky.
after finishing the ins
I recall I was once fscking my head off for half a day, till
I finally decided I can do without the option to boot the Windows
on the IDE disk. After physically disconnecting the IDE and then
running lilo to install again (have a Adaptec AHA-294X Ultra SCSI),
it worked perfectly.
Ben-Nes Michael
Hi All
My Lilo hate me and show only "LI" while loading.
I have motherboard Abit bh6
HD IBM scsi UW 9GB
Tekram 390f-UW
HDA1
HDC1,2
SDA1 600MB - / <<<< bootable flag
sda2 64MB - swap
sda3 2GB - /usr
I tried LINEAR and other way to partion SDA without success.
While
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
