> > Still with Nautilus?
> >
> > Whats up with the gnome people & Nautilus actually? from my tests on RH 7.2
> > and Ximian gnome - it took about 3 minutes to me to see nautilus crashes -
> > and that with GNOME 1.4 latest stable from Ximian...
> >
> > I thought I was alone on this one, but amazin
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > One more noticeable change: the control panel is now viewed inside
> > nautilus. It's quite nice. Nautilus also seems to be a little lighter.
> >
>
> Still with Nautilus?
>
> Whats up with the gnome people & Nautilus actually? from my tests on RH 7.2
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Oren Held wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Saturday 23 February 2002 00:56, Oren Held wrote:
> >
> > > I'd be attaching screenshots unless someone provided better ones in the
> > > gnome site: http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan
> > how about hebrew UI? is gnome 2 translated to hebrew at
Hi,
> On Saturday 23 February 2002 00:56, Oren Held wrote:
>
> > I'd be attaching screenshots unless someone provided better ones in the
> > gnome site: http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan
> how about hebrew UI? is gnome 2 translated to hebrew at all?
> I heard that when hebrew UI is used all inp
On Saturday 23 February 2002 00:56, Oren Held wrote:
> I'd be attaching screenshots unless someone provided better ones in the
> gnome site: http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan
how about hebrew UI? is gnome 2 translated to hebrew at all?
I heard that when hebrew UI is used all input's will be rigt
> You mean this? (http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45699)
>
> As you can see, it's nominated for mozilla1.0. Meanwhile, just
> set MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH to $HOME/.mozilla/plugins in your shell's startup
> file and it should work.
Hmm, good catching - I'll forward it to the codeweavers guys f
On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 15:47, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Yeah, lets hope that mozilla will be optimized. It's dog slow here. Galeon is
> better.. (and who knows - maybe they'll fix the bloody bug which doesn't
> recognized plugins in ~/.mozilla/plugins well)..
You mean this? (http://bugzilla.mozilla
> I heard Nautilus in GNOME 2 should be much more optimized, though I
> didn't have time to try it out yet. Eazel probably developed it with the
> "first make it work, then optimize" approach (just like Mozilla - and
> this isn't a bad approach) and that's how you got it in GNOME 1.4.
Yeah, lets
Nautilus seems to be significantly faster in gnome2.. It's almost even
usable on my machine :) (PII 300, 256MB RAM)
and if you'll check out gnome's bugzilla statistics, nautilus is the
most active software in the gnome project. This is really nice,
considering the fact that its company got closed
On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 14:53, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Oh, and it's SLOW - Pentium 4 1.5Ghz + 768MB RAM + Geforce 2 should be more
> then enough to run nautilus, and I feel it's sluggish...
I heard Nautilus in GNOME 2 should be much more optimized, though I
didn't have time to try it out yet. Eazel
On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 14:16, Oren Held wrote:
> libglade can be PARTLY compiled without python and its xml/expat
> modules.. The thing is that it won't compile a part of libglade which is
> called libglade-convert, and other gnome libs requires it. In short:
> python and the xml/expat modules are
> One more noticeable change: the control panel is now viewed inside
> nautilus. It's quite nice. Nautilus also seems to be a little lighter.
>
Still with Nautilus?
Whats up with the gnome people & Nautilus actually? from my tests on RH 7.2
and Ximian gnome - it took about 3 minutes to me to se
On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 10:57, Adi Stav wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 12:56:39AM +0200, Oren Held wrote:
> >
> > I even had
> > to compile python2 with xml/expat modules in order for libglade to get
> > compiled (I think it's needed only for the compilation, though. it'll be
> > sad if it depe
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 12:56:39AM +0200, Oren Held wrote:
>
> I even had
> to compile python2 with xml/expat modules in order for libglade to get
> compiled (I think it's needed only for the compilation, though. it'll be
> sad if it depends on python).
I know that libglade has explicit support
Hi,
I've installed today Gnome2beta, and here are my impressions:
First, it's quite buggy. I thought it'll be more stable a little,
because the stable version should be released in about a month. Anyway
they seem to fix the bugs quite fast, and some of the bugs I encountered
wer
15 matches
Mail list logo
