Nautilus seems to be significantly faster in gnome2.. It's almost even
usable on my machine :) (PII 300, 256MB RAM)
and if you'll check out gnome's bugzilla statistics, nautilus is the
most active software in the gnome project. This is really nice,
considering the fact that its company got closed and it's now being
developed by gnome volunteers.

On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 15:24, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 14:53, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > Oh, and it's SLOW - Pentium 4 1.5Ghz + 768MB RAM + Geforce 2 should be more 
> > then enough to run nautilus, and I feel it's sluggish...
> 
> I heard Nautilus in GNOME 2 should be much more optimized, though I
> didn't have time to try it out yet. Eazel probably developed it with the
> "first make it work, then optimize" approach (just like Mozilla - and
> this isn't a bad approach) and that's how you got it in GNOME 1.4.
> 
> Nautilus is a central tool on the GNOME desktop. It's employing the
> latest GNOME framework features (GnomeVFS =~ KDE's KIO, GConf, SVG
> icons, GtkHTML2...) and is a flagship product for the GNOME people.
> Asking to trash it would be similar to asking the KDE people to trash
> Konqueror.
> 
> In any case, rewriting is bad. Optimizing existing code is good.
> 
> 
> 
> =================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
> echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 



=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to