> I heard Nautilus in GNOME 2 should be much more optimized, though I > didn't have time to try it out yet. Eazel probably developed it with the > "first make it work, then optimize" approach (just like Mozilla - and > this isn't a bad approach) and that's how you got it in GNOME 1.4.
Yeah, lets hope that mozilla will be optimized. It's dog slow here. Galeon is better.. (and who knows - maybe they'll fix the bloody bug which doesn't recognized plugins in ~/.mozilla/plugins well).. > Nautilus is a central tool on the GNOME desktop. It's employing the > latest GNOME framework features (GnomeVFS =~ KDE's KIO, GConf, SVG > icons, GtkHTML2...) and is a flagship product for the GNOME people. > Asking to trash it would be similar to asking the KDE people to trash > Konqueror. Are you seriously comparing Nautilus to Konqueror?? Nautilus (as much as I know it) doesn't have even 1/8th numbers of "plugins" (KIOSlaves in konqueror) - things like smb, sftp, lan browsing (without mounting), mac share browsing, zip/arj/tar/gz file browsing, pop3, man pages browsing, ldap, nfs, nntp.. should I continue??? Lets face it - Nautilus was a nice idea for it's time - to make a file manager with package installer, which came from a company with 0 knowledge of business know-how, and one of the most buggiest application I ever seen. Of course - if someone could make Nautilus snappier, faster and umm.. lighter - it will be a good thing(tm).. Thanks, Hetz ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
