Oron Peled wrote:
On Monday, 5 בMay 2008, Ira Abramov wrote:
which brings me to the question - should I stick to Fedora (7? 8?) for the
devel environment and break from the RPM world and go for Lenny or Hardy?
Generally, the requirements of any "enterprise/stable" distributions
are ba
Ira Abramov wrote:
you may remember a few weeks ago, I was asking about KDE and kdevelop
for centos5. I recommended against it, the client insisted, now we are
seeing it's buggy as hell, the kde4RHEL repositories give us binaries
newer than what Ubuntu offers, but it gets stuck and sometimes exp
On Monday, 5 בMay 2008, Ira Abramov wrote:
> which brings me to the question - should I stick to Fedora (7? 8?) for the
> devel environment and break from the RPM world and go for Lenny or Hardy?
Generally, the requirements of any "enterprise/stable" distributions
are bad for developers by definit
What is the current status of IPv6 deployment in Israel?
I am interested in an answer to this question because of the following
projection:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MonkeyBites/~3/284126431/996-days-projec.html
http://he.net/news/Hurricane_Electric_IPv6_Update_April_2008.pdf
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Ohad Levy wrote:
for embedded platform development, its required to create devices which are
hardware specific (i.e. our own modules).
any way to reduce the risk?
The easiest way is to write a small script that mknods only specific
devices, and let the user sudo that scri
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Ira Abramov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you may remember a few weeks ago, I was asking about KDE and kdevelop
> for centos5. I recommended against it, the client insisted, now we are
> seeing it's buggy as hell, the kde4RHEL repositories give us binaries
> newer
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Arie Skliarouk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Two questions:
> >
> > 1. Is this correct (that vserver will run more efficiently in that
> situation)?
>
> Memory will be used more effectively
Hi.
Now I am connecte to Internet via HOT+BARAK
And I am going to reconsider later part (i.e Barak)
Could you share some recommendation/experience ?
Thanks.
Valery.
Be a better friend, newshound, and
Why doesn't that developer have his own PC?
If the developer needs to write his own kernel modules, then he needs
root privileges anyway.
But if he just develops applications for an embedded system, which
already has debugged modules, then the devices can be created beforehand
(manually or via udev
Ohad Levy wrote:
for embedded platform development, its required to create devices
which are hardware specific (i.e. our own modules).
any way to reduce the risk?
Thanks
Are these modules loaded into the running kernel, or are they just being
created so they can be saved to the image for late
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:59:22PM +0800, Ohad Levy wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Is there any risk to give a user sudo rights of mknod?
>
> as far as I understand it now, it can only create new devices,
> therefor the risk for a running system is minimal.
Not sure what you mean by 'new devices', if yo
for embedded platform development, its required to create devices which are
hardware specific (i.e. our own modules).
any way to reduce the risk?
Thanks
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ohad Levy wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Is there any risk to
Ohad Levy wrote:
Hello All,
Is there any risk to give a user sudo rights of mknod?
as far as I understand it now, it can only create new devices,
therefor the risk for a running system is minimal.
Thanks,
Ohad
As others mentioned, giving someone the right to mknod is equivalent to
giving the
What about udev?
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Ohad Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Is there any risk to give a user sudo rights of mknod?
> as far as I understand it now, it can only create new devices, therefor the
> risk for a running system is minimal.
>
> Thanks,
> Ohad
>
--- On Mon, 5/5/08, Ohad Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Ohad Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: mknod
> To: "linux-il"
> Date: Monday, May 5, 2008, 4:59 PM
> Hello All,
>
> Is there any risk to give a user sudo rights of mknod?
> as far as I understand it now, it can only create new
Ira,
which repository did you use for the KDE RPMS? what centos shipped
with or from kde-redhat.sf.net? The ones that comes with Centos are
crappy as hell.
Thanks,
Hetz
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Ira Abramov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you may remember a few weeks ago, I was asking about K
Hello All,
Is there any risk to give a user sudo rights of mknod?
as far as I understand it now, it can only create new devices, therefor the
risk for a running system is minimal.
Thanks,
Ohad
you may remember a few weeks ago, I was asking about KDE and kdevelop
for centos5. I recommended against it, the client insisted, now we are
seeing it's buggy as hell, the kde4RHEL repositories give us binaries
newer than what Ubuntu offers, but it gets stuck and sometimes explodes,
totally unworka
Hi,
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two questions:
>
> 1. Is this correct (that vserver will run more efficiently in that
> situation)?
Memory will be used more effectively, as free memory is shared. In case
vservers use a shared storage (such as /home
Hi,
Voltaire Ltd. (http://www.voltaire.com) is looking for outstanding
candidates to fill the positions described below. For obvious reasons,
I only list positions directly involving Linux here.
If you are interested, please send your CV to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(do not reply to this message) -
Hi,
>maybe
>using vservers instead of a fully para-virtualized Xen
Question: are you talking about "lvs" (http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/)
or about Linux-VServer
(http://linux-vserver.org/Welcome_to_Linux-VServer.org) or maybe something else?
Regards,
Rami Rosen
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:07 A
21 matches
Mail list logo
