Re: [li..........il: related]: Quantum relativity 0.1 completed counting backwords in time; all numbers base 1.0 [r] == fourtytwo.

2008-04-22 Thread Uri
Friends, if you want to see the math first, it's very simple: Google says 1.101 + 1.101 [is: ]= 2.2, of course he's lying again and it's 2.202 (my calculator). Of course also 7.77 + 7.0707 = 14.77 (google lies) and 14.77000707 ( my calculator; m

Re: [li..........il: related]: Quantum relativity 0.1 completed counting backwords in time; all numbers base 1.0 [r] == fourtytwo.

2008-04-22 Thread Uri
[got your e-mail, Shachar Shemesh]. Sorry I can't continue off list, unless asked by "authorities", this issue is very urgent and important to everybody, so I believe, we have been cheated and lied for decades if not centuries by the government of the United States of America and their agents, I m

Re: [li..........il: related]: Quantum relativity 0.1 completed counting backwords in time; all numbers base 21 [r].

2008-04-22 Thread Robert Wallner
Hi Uri, I think you have a lot of valid points in your research. But I think it's not wise to post your findings on a public mailing list that anyone can read. Like you, I also have found some very disturbing facts about Internet communications, but we can't disclose them here, you understand why.

Re: [li..........il: related]: Quantum relativity 0.1 completed counting backwords in time; all numbers base 1.0 [r] == fourtytwo.

2008-04-22 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Uri wrote: Another update for you friends; Hi Uri, Being as it is that there seems to be a discussion going, but is somewhat off topic to the list, would it be too much to ask that you take this off list? Failing that, can you please make sure that the replies you send are kept in the s

Re: [li..........il: related]: Quantum relativity 0.1 completed counting backwords in time; all numbers base 21 [r].

2008-04-22 Thread Uri
[Robert Wallner; sent you something in private]; My dear friends (who are friends), Thanks for the support of those who really support me and thanks for the patience if there are some of you who don't know me or what I am wanting from you [not a miake, I'm changing my language here]; anyw

Re: [li..........il: related]: Quantum relativity 0.1 completed counting backwords in time; all numbers base 1.0 [r] == fourtytwo.

2008-04-22 Thread Uri
Another update for you friends; Thought about it and decided to double the quantum twentyone; basing 42 (fourtytwo) now which is really 1.000 (tripple counting 2;3;7 respectively; don't forget to count the same order as I am!) so my number is [all strings are equal, my singularity; you can use any

KDE remote connection

2008-04-22 Thread Ami Chayun
Hi, I connect to my desktop from remote on a daily basis. Since I find remote X to be quite sluggish on DSL I prefer VNC. I usually use vnc4linux/tightvnc, but I recently played with the built in 'Desktop Sharing' feature of KDE. I find it to out-preform the other VNC implementations in many ways

Re: yet another Hot packet drop

2008-04-22 Thread Erez D
hey ohad, how is everything going ? i had the same problem, i phoned bezeqint, they told me to call hot. i told them - you are my ISP, and i expect better support from you then just tell me call HOT. so they called hot and we had a conferance call hot told me to disconenct my modem from all the c

Re: Posix/NTPL : Is particular thread alive ? (pthread_timedjoin_np ??)

2008-04-22 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Lev Olshvang wrote: Gilad, thank you very much. It is exactly what I was looking for. Glad I could help. Perhaps you could also advise me on the second item I posted recenly : "What is a proper way to make User mode device (pseudo device) ?" May be my question was not expresssed in a prop

Re: Posix/NTPL : Is particular thread alive ? (pthread_timedjoin_np ??)

2008-04-22 Thread Lev Olshvang
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: Lev Olshvang wrote: I am looking for generic way to ask about  thread existence. You mean like calling pthread_kill() with a signal number of zero? :-) Gilad -- Gilad Ben-Yossef Chief Coffee Drinker Codefidence Ltd. The code is free, your time i