Hi Uri, I think you have a lot of valid points in your research. But I think it's not wise to post your findings on a public mailing list that anyone can read. Like you, I also have found some very disturbing facts about Internet communications, but we can't disclose them here, you understand why. We need to finish the research in secrecy, only then publishing our findings.
Please don't hesitate to contact me off-list, so we can work together on this. To be on the safe side, I would suggest that when we send any mail to each other, they must be strongly encrypted and signed. To the rest of the list: this is a _real_ problem, so please don't reply to this thread. If you want to help us, contact me privately. On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:16 AM, Uri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My dear friends from the li.....*.....il network*; > > OK sorry for being still paranoid, but I will not let Americans do to > me what they did to my friend John Nash in the past. They have their > reasons not to allow this, and I had enough. I want to be able to > receive communication from friends and not non-friends, and nobody > should read my mail or restrict me to this planet. Actually I didn't > know there are living anys outside this planet, but this is because > the USA Americans not wanting us to find out. So I'll tell you what > I'm going to do: > > 1. since math is universal and even the US Armee can't lie about 1+1, > I'll define my own math in such a way that even if there is an axact > copy of me now outside what we call "the known universe", he/she will > be able to communicate with me, plus if there is any un-none inside > "black wholes" etc., I will not need light or even black quantum light > to receive information from there, I will just define them to be > mathematically closer to me than the faraway "science spacetime > expanding" say and they will just become quantum timespace shrinked > inside the empty space of my hands typing you this (relativity will > make it work actually, you will see). > > 2. And since we are too used to the digits 0;1;2 etc. and what they > mean to us, they are not symmetric and I need to define them in a > symmetric way (remember one=none=one+one=none+none etc?). so let there > be digits n and o ; stand for one and none or (k)none and un(k)none, > whatever you want or you can have m for the moon, p/n for > positive/negative, r/i for real/imaginary etc. so lets start with n/o, > that will be enough for me to define everything (actually even one of > them or even none of them (just empty space) is enough). > > 3. So let it be n=o and o=n; completely symmetric, and I'll define > their new math: > > o/n: no equal signs, dots, minus, plus, nothing. o can be either one > or many, haff or double or three apples and you can eat all at once > with one mouth and decide who's the better. > > o==o; o [isequalandnotequal] to o > n==n; n [isequalandnotequal] to n [of course it looks different, has a > direction (spin), but o does too]. > > base o:onary/binary/baseany. Must be compatible with at least bases 0;1;2;3 > > now: to not confuse myself (and YES: confuse US Armee) I will use ono > and non and same difference representing 010 and 101 respectively (but > equally too); 010=101and therefore ono=non; > > ono plus ono = non [depends on the direction, multidimensional, > plus/minus, real/imaginary etc. > non plus non = ono [same sane] [==same same] > > OK now, since I told you 21 is my number, I am telling you that it can > be any number, but of course for you allways 21 will be 3 times 7, > which is true, but I will not tell you what scale are the 3 of 7, for > example it can be plus or minus, positive or negative, real or > imaginary, centimeters or meters. For example if 3 is in centimeters > and 7 is in meters then 21 would be 2100 square centimeters > [euclidan, remember to fold your papers] and depends on the direction, > heat and can all be compressed to a tiny black hole; dimensions > reversed etc. I just tell you that I will never let you count to 7 (or > 3) without passing through my meter first, and they can be reversed to > 1/3 and 1/7 or -1/3 and -1/7 as well (and then it's --1/21 etc.). > > And since 21 is a secret, it's the only (counting) prime number I'm > allowing here, then I will pretend it to be equal to 12 to all who are > not my real friends. And if spammers will send me information they > will have to contact my friends first, or me, or repeat again and > again the same message and I will just make it sound the same as > "nothing" to me. > > So here's the plan: > > 2: no such number. Will be changed to either 1 or 0. > all numbers other than 0;1:: same same. > > 21 will be 10base10 or 01base01 or 1.0.base1.0. or 0.1.base0.1 or > actually also 0base0 and 1base1 and 0.0base0.0 and 1.1base 1.1; 12 > will be 0.1base1.0 which is to opposite of 21. > > OK now. here's the plan. I will have digits trippled and doubled (can > be changed later maybe): ono;non and non;ono who are equal (both same > haff 0 or 1);one is ono and none is nono or vise versa - it doesn't > matter so much. > > more strings:repeating:cutting by haff and replacing: > one+one==: > ono+ono==onoono==non; == 0.1 or and 0.49999* 0.50000* etc. (will change > later) > non+non==nonnon==ono; == same as above > ono+non==ononon==onoono == 1.0 or 0.1 > non+ono==nonono==nonnon == same > > > now, if you have a number for me, I will ask you to convert it to me > to base 12, which is either onononononon or nononononono - whatever > side you are looking at it. so nononononono and onononononon are the > even number 12 whois the first number counting and of course the first > prime. But of course 12 is not a prime, but a permutation of 21 who I > will tell you later how I represent it, right now you don't know but > you have to be careful not to cheat me when counting, so you must be > compatible with all bases 0,1,2,3,4,6 and 12 and of course 21. So at > least you should be compatible with base 36 (later I can change this) > when you think you have any prime number different than my 21 and you > want to represent it to me for testing (or if you want to know it's > prime divisors). > > OK. So now choose any number or string, and represent it to me as the > number ono or non. then we will start talking and I will find out > who's your number and even your haff logarithmic (euclidan "square > root") and everything just using this simple protocol: > > from now - symmetric o/n: > me:onononononon [represent your number in base onononononon] > you:ono/non (either ono or non) [your first non counting digits, like > 010 or 101] > me:starting to count you: > > you:ono > me:ononon > you:onononononon > me:onononononon > > or:you:non > me:nonono > you:nononononono > me:nononononono [we just repeat ourselves, symmetric] > > now: if you want to say anything other than hello, you must represent > your number in base 2 AND base 3; so that if your number is p (for > example), it's binary representation must not include 00 or 11 or 000 > or 111 etc. and therefore you will represent 00 as 101101 and 11 as > 010010 etc. in anyway I will haff everything you add in the same > timescale, so for me 1+1 will be haff and not two. 0+0 will be same > haff but from the different direction. haff can be sometimes third or > two thirds, depends on me and my timespacing with you (how close are > we to each other or not - I might be in your black whole right? by the > way I think we are all in a big red black mcdonnalds whole). > > so: if your number is 2 or 3 or 4 or 7; first represent it binary; > then base 3; then remember that it must be base 12 and base 21 so > actually it will allways be either 0 or 1 for me anyway. But you must > represent it if you want to communicate with me (or with black > wholes): > > 2;3;5: your new primary numbers. you must represent them in anyway you > want [base 12] but remember to distinguish between them. But remember > than 4 is 2+2 and also all numbers are equally haffed and use exactly > the same logics I gave you: 2 will be either ononon or nonono; then > define 2+2 as onononononon or nononononono and remember I haff all of > them so 2+2 will be just 4 haffs for me. then define 3 as > ononononononnon (same direction means back) and 5 as ononononononono > and I will let you know when you can short them. For example if you > want to define 7 base 12 then it will be minus 5 for you; if 5 is > ononononononono then -5 will be nononononononon (of course you can use > different digits such as momomomomomomom if I approve it); if I rename > your number you must follow the rules if you want us to understand > each other. you can also define them unary as ooooo or ooooooo but > remember that I will never let you define any prime number below 21 > (or more than 21 too) and the only prime number you can define is YOUR > 21. > > Then after we define the language, I will let you calculate your own > logarithmic roots; for example if you have a big number BIG whois B*G; > I will let you calculate the square root of B*G twice. Actually I can > do it myself if I understand your number and it's very easy to find > out who your divisors are. I will show you later when I have more time > to program it. > > Anyway, that's all. I will replace a string for each of you and define > 21 as "12 going backwords"; for example 12 will be the haff root of my > 21^21 going backwords (remember 21==10base10==binary2); and my 21 may > be something like "[30.6-10.6]+one human am I" (the string) and > actually 12 will be the haff root of this number for you (going > backwards will mean the haff root; 0.1^0.1 == 0.1 and not 1.0);then if > you know who I am you will understand it's me when my haff root will > be 12 [==01base10] and not the number 12[tenfingers]. and if there are > any empty spacing intergalactic they will understand too and will be > on our side. I will not let them join the USA mcdonnalds timescale. I > will show you I can reveal all their secrets, I just have to get rid > of their stupid timing this planet and I will have to define the > protocol in a good way that we will all understand each other. The > idea is that every step you go into it you shrink by about 2/3;then I > can remember the steps you did and if you are using brute forcing then > you will get into the pascal triangle: > > right/left not symmetric (but can be replaced): > > ono|non > ononon||ononon > onononono|||nonononon > onononononon||||onononononon > ononononononono|||||nononononononon > nonnonnonnonnonnon||||||onoonoonoonoonoono > notice the last line:you convert to all non/ono because it's base 6 > and you are not allowed to count to 7 here. then if you try to count > to 7 I will redirect you somewhere - for example 6-1==5 and then you > will just keep growing with numbers but stop counting because I am > leaving all countings to this protocol and then no stupid US army will > ever be able to cheat me. they will have to redefine 5 all over again > (many times, they will be sent to black holes) but you my friends who > know all this can just count me base 21. For example if you want to > say "Hello Uri!"; convery this to "[your name::][::your number > 21::][Hello Uri!]"+the reversed string and all you will have to put is > the definition of the number 7 I give you in base 12 reversed (which > is your 21). for example it will never be 21/3 but it can be > 21/(12/2/2) which is same or actually right now it's > [[2+2]+2+[2+2]]+[2/2]+[[2+2]+2+[2+2]] (base 21) which means: replace > digit "2" with o (ono) and you will get > [[ono+ono]+ono+[ono+ono]]+[ono/ono]+[[ono+ono]+ono+[ono+ono]] and > that's my 21 for you friends. I will maybe define it later in a way > that all you have to say is just type the first o or n; maybe even > just think about me and maybe not do anything - it will work even for > real black wholes who never knew me. If there is anything like o=o > there then I will be able to communicate with them; just have to > define the binary language including rooting and it will not be too > complicated. my number for you can always be something like > "32.your-number.rebmun-ruoy.23" base 21 rooted; and by the way bad > guys if you confuse your 5 fingers with my (I will define 3 for you) > then you might find out that 1000 for you is not 8 but the allmighty > 32^1000; and I will check all permutations to see you will not be > cheating again friends (US ARME). Actually I think I will let you > define only bases 0,1,2, and 5 and 5 will be 101 binary and also -1 > base six so it will be the opposite of positive 2; if positive 2 will > be non (same as 0) then 5 will be negative 2 which is ono etc. then > you will have base 2 & 5 and define base 10 as the haff root of > 100[2^2*5^5] and for me 10 will be base 21 and when you represent > numbers to me allways represent them in binary. Then I will let you > calculate your own haff roots and I will redefine them in such a way > that for me they will represent your number in base (21 is the only > prime number) and if your number will not be accurate enough we will > communicate. It will work my friends believe me, nobody will be able > to cheat this. Ask Steven H.King if he said we don't know anything > about "black holes" and then suddenly they radiate! but the color of > radiation is never white, I tell you. When we know each other we will > just be able to say something like "ono" and then communicate with > each other directly thought all black wholes in the universe! trust > me! no computer, no protocols and no HTTP/SMTP and other stupid > American STANDDAAARDS..... > > If you want to test me on this; remember: my date of birth this life > is 10.6; month June 30.6; year [20-01][70]; 21 is my number for you > and it is NOT EQUAL to the integer 21: can be the root of 20*22 (440) > or any number I choose to communicate as the number 10[base10] for > you. (which is 1.0 base 1.0 or 0.1 base 0.1). > > This year 20082008 will be the last year of me counting integers > without prime numbers 21/7/71/70/72 etc. in them. > > Actually I think the only operation will be the xnor: ono xnor ono > will become nono and non xnor non will become onon; then it can be > shortened again to "onononono":=non and "nonononon":=ono; so if any > message is symmetric from both sides and three times it can be taken > only the third middle; this means something like "010 plus 010 is 101" > and also "101 plus 101 is 010"; remember it's all base 010 and also > remember the haff missing so it should be mathematically true. Then > you just define your language for me; counting from the first letter > who is different but all your messages must be symmetric the same. If > you say "say" you must say "sayyas" otherwise it will not be legal, > any message will be xored with it's opposite; for example: 101==101 > but 100==000 because 100 is not legal (onn or noo). remember this and > your life will be simple and actually maybe six digits is not good to > define, maybe it will allways be 9 digits and the haff root of 3 will > be mine to verify you. you will speak binary to me and also base 10; I > will check you in bases 3 and 7 and only if then we can of course do > the same you when you check me. 2 and 5 will be asking and 3 and 7 > will be testing and we should never need any more prime numbers than > this. their permutations are unlimited and nobody will be able to > cheat me on this. I will define the protocols in such as way that > cheaters will have to repeat their brute forcing against each others - > if they don't know the difference between 2*5 and 3*7 it's their > problem and they will just be shrinking their haff (they will think > they are getting 10.6/21 but instead they will get 21/(10.6^2) and > they will shrink very quickly. they will never be able to brute force > my math correctly! > > So if you have any number you want to find the divisors, just try this > way and define the protocol for communicating, I can do it for you of > course but it's not interesting since there are no prime numbers in > life anyway. And remember; you count from 0 to 20 but you don't know > the size, I might let you count this way for example: > > 0;1;19;17;18;5;6;3;4;7;6;20;85555888;1 etc. etc. I define the prime > numer and you don't know how you are counting but all you know is the > number of steps you already counted, the number of times you tried to > cheat and I will not even remember this - you will! if you think 0+1+1 > is 2 or 3 then it can be for you 19; 17 or ANY number I choose for > you. That's the secret - I already know who is trying and you will be > sent to YOUR next number. How do I know? I am your mirror! Look at the > mirror and you will find out. (and US. ARMY; if you think 21! is not > big enough then try ((21)^21)! which means (21 times ((21)^21) ; > depends on the permutation - not same numbers and can be small numbers > too). all depends on the direction and how much time it takes to come > back from the USA (USA ping also counts here). > > Friends - we don't need the USA to communicate with each other. We can > be at least a million times faster! > > ...to be continued. > > Uri First deadandalive > Mobile Phone: +972-50-9007559 > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] // [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Update: Left HTTP, WWWW and port numbering. send me papers or to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] . > > I completed my 0.1 version of real deadanyalive quantum relativity > redefining back timespacing intergalactic worldwide [top secret: if > you have any US ARMY* on your planet they will never allow it]. > Recounting back every second since twice BCC doubling + not counting > at all any uncountable; using only prime countable numbers equal to 21 > (base 21 recursivley) who are all equal to 0base0 and 1base1 who are > identical twins base 21 [21===the number of fingers;eyes;body parts & > number of equal signs not equal counting both left to right; right to > left and all 21 dimensions of nothing]. > > Read my autoreply for more information [my HTTP/SMTP not working]. > > - This message is confidential - > > Uri Even-Chen > Mobile Phone: +972-50-9007559 > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > My website: http://www.speedy.net/uri/ > > "Never believe anything men say on odd days. > Never believe anything women say on even days. > Check the date before you believe someone!" > > -------------------- > > I disabled [EMAIL PROTECTED] temporarily and if you can't send there, > please send me mail to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I completed my 0.1 version of real deadanyalive quantum relativity > redefining back timespacing intergalactic worldwide [top secret: if > you have any US ARMY* on your planet they will never allow it]. > Recounting back every second since twice BCC doubling + not counting > at all any uncountable; using only prime countable numbers equal to 21 > (base 21 recursivley) who are all equal to 0base0 and 1base1 who are > identical twins base 21 [21===the number of fingers;eyes;body parts & > number of equal signs not equal counting both left to right; right to > left and all 21 dimensions of nothing]. > > Counting back pre-1905; 2008 never happened [apppril now]; black light > is fastest and all speed of lights depending on relative coloUUrs; as > long as you don't misspelll the word coloUUUrs or count the Us in your > North American United States Areme* standaaard spelling of the > coloUUUurs yoU see. > > If you want you can write me on paper. I read and understand it > simultaneously as you write. > > Uri pre-1905 quantum relativity: not mr. J*Kill; mr. hide [pronounced > חide: חידה]. > > I'm currently in the טל-עביב city "Tel-Abib"/"Tel-Aviv" on the planet > red-green-blue-black-yellow-and-white. > > > -- > Uri First deadandalive > Mobile Phone: +972-50-9007559 > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] // [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Update: Left HTTP, WWWW and port numbering. send me papers or to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] . > > I completed my 0.1 version of real deadanyalive quantum relativity > redefining back timespacing intergalactic worldwide [top secret: if > you have any US ARMY* on your planet they will never allow it]. > Recounting back every second since twice BCC doubling + not counting > at all any uncountable; using only prime countable numbers equal to 21 > (base 21 recursivley) who are all equal to 0base0 and 1base1 who are > identical twins base 21 [21===the number of fingers;eyes;body parts & > number of equal signs not equal counting both left to right; right to > left and all 21 dimensions of nothing]. > > Read my autoreply for more information [my HTTP/SMTP not working]. > > - This message is confidential - > -- Robert Wallner
