Re: DisableSuspend.apk

a runtime setting? so we have to run it on every boot, no? Can we add this to a generic place in lava-android-test (or dispatcher) to ensure we call this first thing every time when booting up a unit? -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://www.linaro.org | Open s

Re: Architectures to support when releasing binaries

> 32 bit libraries What libs are potentially missing? How many of those could get linked in statically? -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blo

Re: DisableSuspend.apk

also had to add a My understanding is that this is not a board specific feature and we have to disable suspend on all boards that run android in LAVA. > It does work great though, and I'm able to keep the board up and running > with it!  Thanks for figuring this out Yongqin! &g

Re: Sources for 11.11 kernel release

place that comes to my mind is obviously the release wiki page: https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1201/Release/? -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog _

Re: Sources for 11.11 kernel release

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012, Alexander Sack wrote: >>  * hide people/ trees and show them on people.git.linaro.org instead >> of main git.linaro.org. At best git:// urls would be valid still >> aftterwards >>  * hide t

Re: [Linaro-validation] Linaro kernel tree for A15 for daily builds

d a defconfig we would be ready to go. Might require a few minor tweaks if the LAVA job for A15 needs different input parameters, so if that's the case let Deepti and Danilo know about the details. -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://www.linaro.org | Open sourc

Re: [RFC] Upcoming work view for individual engineers

esent/group them? > > Crazy idea to expand on: why not merge the p.l.o patch queues into the > status.linaro.org view? Indeed an interesting idea. Let's add this to our status topics to be discussed at connect! -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://www.

Re: linaro blocking issue

gt; > sudo gpg --keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com:80 --recv-keys 7BE1F97B > > since this is a one-time operation -- once the key is set up > transferring packages is done over regular http. > > > > -- > > ___ > linaro-

Re: [ANN] Support for fetching build configs from git for Android Builds

a great feature ... I see a dev now could retrieve that config from git to then reproduce an exact build using the same configs and toolchain etc. What kind of tools can we offer to make that easy? -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://www.linaro.org | Open so

Re: Single zImage and KVM

ost likely would require some platform plumming to ship two or more DTs for one kernel. What do we need for that? I guess we need a way to have two different device trees produced into the same image/hwpack and make it easy to decide at deploy time what u-boot is supposed to select? -- Al

Re: jenkins really broken right now

instance, bit > it wasn't, so doesn't explain why builds went thru. So, maybe it's not > squid after all. We'll be looking into the issue immediately. The builds went through _after_ i disabled the git proxy setting. Before that kernel_cloud builds failed after

Re: Call for testing Linaro Android 12.04 candidates

ard was for that and not for testing. Jon: I am sure if you talk to Amit you can strike a deal with him to help you out on the weekly testing (e.g. every other week). -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://www.linaro.org | Open source s

Re: Getting from a CI report to a hardware pack

ng, validating, etc.). Anyway, we should start thinking about visualizing CI jobs and make them navigatable soon. I don't want to see us making the mistake again to wait for a nice UI until all the plumming is done. That approach just leave lots of value on the floor! I am sure Andy, Ricardo and

Re: Getting from a CI report to a hardware pack

On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Christian Robottom Reis > wrote: > >> I think there's a standard link missing from CI pages such as >> >> >> https://ci.linaro.org/jenkins/job/TI-workin

Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree

e discussed a feature of "conflicting" topics that would mitigate the problem by producing a tree for each topic that has conflicts that leaves out the conflicting topics. At this point in time, we cannot handle conflicting topics yet ... our tools have to get in shape for that first and we

Re: No group tracks at Connect

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:45 PM, David Rusling wrote: > Hmmm.I prefer Kiko's topics, these can also be grouped under the TL's. > Each time we've tried this, we've ended up with WG / team driven tracks as > before... > > where are kikos topics? --

Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree

I like the idea of establishing all or a subset of WG topics as the "linaro mandatory" set that the LTs have to converge around... this includes making decisions on what CMA version everybody should use. With that I would say: let's do it. Andrey/Ricardo: do you agree? Can we make su

Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Andrey Konovalov < andrey.konova...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 04/19/2012 03:07 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Andy Green > <mailto:andy.gr...@linaro.org>**> wrote: >> >>On 04/

Re: checksum file for LEB images

ure offered by platform. Thanks for your suggestion! I hope we might be able to do this manually for this month release (Fathi?); properly landing this in our automation infrastructure might take more than a couple of days and I wouldn't commit that we get there by 12.04 milestone. But let

Re: linux-linaro-core-tracking tree created / update frequency

ultz for the time being) gets notified and asked to fix the merge conflict on his side. Your daily merge scripts would then pick it up automatically as soon as the merge conflict is resolved. Sounds right? -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams ht

Re: linux-linaro-core-tracking tree created / update frequency

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:10 PM, John Stultz wrote: > On 05/03/2012 07:15 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Andrey Konovalov >>  wrote: >>> >>> Sorry for the delay. >>> >>> I've updated the linux-linaro

Re: android-build's are failing, we're on it...

finitely better than nothing. Especially if you are in the mids of a firedrill you might not have the time to explain the context, nor might you understand whats going on at all etc. -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for

Re: pointless mail, (was Re: android-build's are failing...)

ssue, I'd send at least 20 of them, which is useful but > that still doesn't make me send them to the list.] Actually, I think LAVA outage was announced. I poked for getting more status updates, so more mails would have been great. Same goes for ci.linaro.org ... if our CI service

Re: 12.05 linux-linaro kernel tree

orks and if there are problems collaboratively try to fix that with the goal to release from tip? e.g. with help from ARM and Samsung LT? Is that a bad idea? -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs http://twi

Re: 12.05 linux-linaro kernel tree

RC comes around. 3. linux-linaro will not wait for topics to be ready before doing the RC jump 4. in between RCs, we only move mainline on our linux-linaro release baseline forward if we see a working tracking build that wouldn't drop any topics that already made it into this RC cycle. Though

Re: 12.05 linux-linaro kernel tree

licts and pain over and over again might serve as good indication to target investment in upstreaming or frameworks improvements/refactoring. I assume this idea has been played through? What's the plan forward to solve this problem? Maybe if we look closely there might be potential ba

Re: 12.05 linux-linaro kernel tree

TI to the mix this month (and not all?)? In any case, you should definitely send Andrey a list of topic branches you want to register for linux-linaro and things will get picked up as soon as Andrey can I guess :). -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://ww

Re: 12.05 linux-linaro kernel tree

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 02:27 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: >> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: >> > On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 07:14 +0800, Andy Green wrote:If >> >> the current one pe

Re: 12.05 linux-linaro kernel tree

the clean patchset from Marek. But now that we have the umm topic >> branch in linux-linaro-core-tracking, we don't need topic/cma_v24 >> anymore. If any fixes with respect to Origen are required, I will queue >> them up in another topic branch. >> >> I will short

Re: Golly, is that the dual SD card you and David from tincantools have been working on?

uot; Basically a gadget that allows you to use one sd card shared by two computers. Power off computer A and computer B will see the sdcard. Power on computer A and sd card will get unplugged from computer B; computer A can use it exclusively until it gets powered off again. ... In short: good

Re: 12.05 linux-linaro kernel tree

ee as a one-off. >> >> >> linux-linaro tree is used by some CI jobs. To have the 12.05 stuff being >> tested in LAVA and such, I should have updated the linux-linaro tree as >> early as possible. > > > Should we stop to buil

Re: clone speed on jenkins

way that it should not make much of a diff... The thing is that we have to transfer a complete linux tree to the slave node no matter what. Whether you --reference something on master or use the master hosted squid shouldn't make any significant net difference. So bottom line: I don

Re: clone speed on jenkins

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:03 PM, John Rigby wrote: > Lets discuss this next week.  I understand your point about the squid proxy. Sounds good. Is there a particular session where this could fit in? -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://www.linaro.org | Open sou

Re: Lava images improvement idea

would we really make a -lava variant? Why not include the tests in the LEB directly? Android already ships the tests in the image, so it wouldn't be something entirely new. -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for

Re: clone speed on jenkins

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Alexander Sack writes: > >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Deepti Kalakeri >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:17 AM, John Rigby wrote: >>>> >>>> I

Re: LAVA android tests should be working again

; be safe to resubmit your jobs now. Great. I guess this means we should resubmit our release candidate builds now? If that wasn't done yet, can someone of LAVA team provide a helping hand for that? If so, please ping me :). -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http

Re: Lava images improvement idea

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012, Alexander Sack wrote: >> Assuming we want to do this, would we really make a -lava variant? Why >> not include the tests in the LEB directly? Android already ships the >> tests in the image, so it

Re: Linaro Release 12.05 Postmortem Summary

ot sure what to do with those numbers. Basically, I am not so much worried about low/medium blueprints that didn't get delivered. Any way we could get those numbers broken down by priority? Or just a view on our delivery rates for essential and high blueprints? -- Alexander Sack Technical Direc

Re: Mumble server having issues?

27;s out, but does anyone else have the ability to check in >> and debug the mumble server? > > I'll forward this on to the IS team to take a look into it. Has anyone > else run into similar issues with Mumble? We experienced very odd issues (think similar to that) a few month ba

Re: New beta LAVA feature: filters and subscriptions

some kind of interesting benchmark views. > > I am _super keen_ on getting feedback on whether this seems to be a > useful feature. > Looks promising. I am previewing a filter for the labhealth bundle and see all labhealth jobs (failures and passes). Now I would like to constraint the f

Re: how to update kernel image on panda board?

missing in developer image would be very helpful to improve the out of the box experience we deliver. Thanks! -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg -

Re: Android libjpeg

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > Hi there, > >    I took a look at the AOSP libjpeg code which is included in > >         git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/external/jpeg > > during my flight back home (which incidentally had been diverted and > landed me in Rio

Re: The Linaro monthly release cycle

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > Or we could just use continuous integration where there are no > freezes, just per change regression tests. thats the idealistic goal yes, but getting even close there takes a bit and I am not sure if full continuous integration in the sense

Re: Switch to ubuntu-build.linaro.org

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:16 PM, James Westby wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:04:41 +, Fathi Boudra > wrote: >> > If not, what are the blockers to doing so? >> >> Today, the builders are unstable. > > They have just had new hard disk enclosures added, and should be more > stable now. Let's

Re: Patches from the "Linaro Android Team" team

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > Hi Jim, > (I'm CCing linaro-dev@ because I figure others might have similar > questions) > > This is because the android patches are going to the 'Unknown' > project[1], which is ignored when generating the statistics[2].  We > currently

Re: Switch to ubuntu-build.linaro.org

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote: > On 23 June 2011 10:06, Alexander Sack wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:16 PM, James Westby >> wrote: >>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:04:41 +, Fathi Boudra >>> wrote: >>>> > If not, wh

Re: Customization of Gerrit for Android

hi, great news. I think we should use a different hostname for gerrit. like review.android.linaro.org. With that we have the option to make a dedicated android git host using the android.git.l.o name eventually. Will check with android team what hostname to use exactly and let you know. On Jun

[CALL FOR TESTING] Linaro 11.06 Candidate

Hi, In preparation for the release of Linaro 11.06 images on 2011-06-30, a suitable candidate has been selected for testing. The release is expected to be tested heavily and provide the most stable and feature-rich images to date this cycle. Please help our initiative by testing the official Lina

Re: [CALL FOR TESTING] Linaro 11.06 Candidate

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Bee Hock Goh wrote: > Where can I see the list of features added since 1105? We didn't prepare release highlights/summary for the candidate images this time around but planned to publish them with the final release. But now that you say it I agree we should get th

Re: Linaro 11.06 released

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Joey Stanford wrote: > Excellent work everyone. This is a superb release! Ack++ ... this release is just amazing! Thanks to everyone for their hard work! ... on to 10.07 now! --  - Alexander ___ linaro-dev mailing

Re: Linaro 11.06 released

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Joey Stanford wrote: >> Excellent work everyone. This is a superb release! > > Ack++ ... this release is just amazing! Thanks to everyone for their hard > work! > > ... on to 1

Re: Customization of Gerrit for Android

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:49 PM, James Westby wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:25:59 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: >> hi, >> >> great news. >> >> I think we should use a different hostname for gerrit. like >> review.android.linaro.org. With that we have th

Re: Pandaboard is dumb after reset if USB OTG cable attached to the host

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:33:18 +0100 > Andy Green wrote: > >> On 06/29/2011 07:58 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> >> Hi - >> >> > Month ago, during 11.05 release testing, we had a case when >> > Pandaboard didn't boot with

Re: Consistent names for Linaro kernel trees and releases

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Andy Green wrote: > > It would be less ridiculous than issuing monthly tarballs for the kernel > case. why do you think that tarballs are ridiculous? even kernel.org releases tarballs last I looked. IMO you can prefectly have tags + tarballs coexist and everbody wo

Re: Consistent names for Linaro kernel trees and releases

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Andy Green wrote: > On 07/04/2011 10:25 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Andy Green  wrote: >>> >>> It would be less ridiculous than issuing monthly tarballs for the kernel >>> case. >> >> why do you think that ta

Re: ppas, version numbers, releases and validation.linaro.org

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > Another question I have is around version numbers.  Currently we're > using version numbers like 0.2-0ubuntu0~zyga1.  I don't really see why > the "zyga" is in there :) I think simply dropping the zyga and using > versions like 0.2-

Re: Please tag commits referred to by pinned and release manifests in Android builds

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > In-order to make reproducible builds we create pinned manifests with > each commit explicitly listed. We also use this method to create a > release. We depend on these pinned commits - if they don't exist the > "released" builds can no longer

Re: Please tag commits referred to by pinned and release manifests in Android builds

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:13 AM, John Rigby wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Ricardo Salveti > wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Zach Pfeffer >>> wrote: >>>> In-order to

Re: LAVA 2011.07 Release

Congrats to the Validation Team for this great release! A first few points from looking at the current deployment at http://validation.linaro.org: + The "Image Status" dashboard view is not self-explanatory to me. I only see raw numbers, but no info whether all is good or not is visible there. Wh

Re: [CALL FOR TESTING] Linaro 11.07 Candidate

Thanks james for your feedback and input. On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:48 PM, James Tunnicliffe wrote: > Hi, > > Executive summary: James opens up a can of worms and volunteers to fix it. > > I am not suggesting that we change anything for this release. I don't > mind what the directory structure

Re: Android build failure

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:09 PM, James Westby wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:37:38 -0600, Angus Ainslie > wrote: >> I have a android manifest that builds fine on my local build server >> with -j4 for concurrent makes. >> >> The same manifest fails to build on android-build.linaro.org The log i

Re: ADB/Android Screencast

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote: > > > On 3 August 2011 14:31, Fathi Boudra wrote: >> >> forward to linaro-dev ml >> >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From: Frans Gifford >> Date: 3 August 2011 11:55 >> Subject: ADB/Android Screencast >> >> Hi all, >> >> I assume m

Re: Problems with linaro-android_toolchain-4.6-2011.07 rebuilds

this should be fixed now. folks, please use: umask 002 in your .bashrc -> ssh git.linaro.org -> change .bashrc there. I guess from now on we could consider to use gerrit for toolchain etc. too. Thanks! On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 8:16 PM, James Westby wrote: > On Sun, 7 Aug 2011 02:25:17 +0100, Za

Re: Changing default root file system to btrfs

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:08 PM, James Tunnicliffe wrote: > > I just tested two a nano images using ext4 and they didn't find the > root file system. So, we are at least gated on that bug. I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-ubuntu/+bug/822593 to make ext4 our default. Seems that our kernel

Re: Problems with linaro-android_toolchain-4.6-2011.07 rebuilds

ok spads from IS gave better suggestion than using umask in .bashrc. Now, we propose that you set alias for git like: alias git='UMASK=002 git' Please update accordingly. Thanks! On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: > this should be fixed now. folks, please use:

Re: Switching to Gerrit for Android code hosting - last stage

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Patrik Ryd wrote: > Hi, > I have followed (and updated) the instructions > on https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/Gerrit . > I can not log in with my launchpad account. I get the message "The requested > URL /OpenID was not found on this server." I can confirm

Re: linaro libjpeg-turbo roadmap

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Tom Gall wrote: > Hi All, > > I thought I would clarify what is in store for the next few linaro > cycles from a libjpeg-turbo perspective. > > 11.08 > 1.1.2 libjpeg-turbo (featuring cleaned up patches) > upstreaming and support of what could be a late august upstr

Re: linaro libjpeg-turbo roadmap

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Tom Gall wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Tom Gall wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I thought I would clarify what is in store for the next few linaro >>

Re: Why are our Android toolchains 32bit?

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Bernhard Rosenkranzer wrote: > Hi, > while working on some improvements, I noticed that our Android > toolchain binaries are built as 32-bit x86. > Is there any reason for this (other than "we inherited it from AOSP")? > > While it doesn't matter much, it doesn't m

Re: Announcement:Linaro Android 2.3.5

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:16:36PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:00:32 +0200 > > Patrik Ryd wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Linaro Android has now moved up to 2.3.5. > > > > > > The daily builds (https:/

Re: QA tests for Android

what about usb device storage (e.g. mounting my phone sd from my computer)? similar I think usb also is supposed to work for tethering in android. On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > Sure. I didn't list it because Android doesn't really support generic > USB (it will in Ice Cre

Re: l-m-c: Increase default image size?

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Dirk Behme wrote: > > Using linaro-media-create (version > linaro-image-tools_0.4.8-**0ubuntu1~lucid1_all) > to create an image the default image size seems to be 2GB if no --image_size > is given. > > this was mentioned in known issues section of july release. se

Re: 11.08 Android toolchain RC is ready

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Bernhard Rosenkranzer < bernhard.rosenkran...@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi, > the 11.08 Android toolchain RC is ready: > > > https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/toolchain-4.6-2011.08/#build=6 > > https://android-build.linaro.org/jenkins/job/linaro-an

Re: 11.08 Android toolchain RC is ready

so following up: panda tip build succeeded and the android test results showed up as expected and all looks fine (manually eyeballed the serial.log and 0xbench results seem to show up nicely). here where the results show up: - android results: http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/dashboard/r

Re: 11.08 Android toolchain RC is ready

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > so following up: > > panda tip build succeeded and the android test results showed up as > expected and all looks fine (manually eyeballed the serial.log and 0xbench > results seem to show up nicely). > > here wher

Re: QA tests for Android

m/Android/BoardSupportStatus/ComponentTestCaseswith details on what to do to test each feature. On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > what about usb device storage (e.g. mounting my phone sd from my computer)? > similar I think usb also is supposed to work for tethering in an

Re: issues benchmarking 11.08 toolchain

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > That looks suspiciously close to the code that we patched out in platform a > while back to get 4.5/4.6 going in external/elfcopy/: > > > http://android.git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=platform/external/elfcopy.git

Re: QA tests for Android

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:03:45PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > > I filled out the form based on Zach's input. One can go and see an > example > > here: > > > > + > > > https://docs.

Android Mainline Builds for Beagle/XM and Panda (Re: [CALL FOR TESTING] Linaro 11.08 Release Candidate (without QA Tracker!!!))

Hi, one thing this announce was not clear enough about was that - on top of our android LEB candidate builds - we provide Android MAINLINE builds for panda and beagle/XM. If you are interested in linaro android for beagle or panda running on top of linaro mainline focused kernel, please follow th

Re: Linaro 11.08 released

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote: > Hi, > > On 26 August 2011 12:18, Dave Martin wrote: > > Hi there > > > > A few questions-- > > > > a) Is the omission of the "Developers and Community Builds" links from > > http://www.linaro.org/downloads/ intentional? > > Yes, it is. We ma

Re: Linaro 11.08 released

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote: > > The wiki release page itself is not easily findable without going to the > wiki. > > > Really? It's clearly mentionned on the release announcement, posted on > planet. > Obviously, if somebody miss the announce and goes directly to the webs

Re: Please just send things to linaro-dev...

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Botao Sun wrote: > Hi Zach, > > Although I think "linaro-andr...@linaro.org" is easy to use, especially > inside the team, but if consider about the development information sharing > and to avoid duplicate discussion, send message to linaro-dev may be the > most

Re: ANN: ASTER - Android System Testing Environment and Runtime

Hi Jim, sounds interesting. Would be cool to have this integrated/available in linaro android. I guess this would help us design and execute testcases for android to be run in LAVA? wonder how much overlap this has with the testrunner framework discussed/developed in pauls team for android+lava.

Re: Linaro 11.08 released

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Fathi Boudra > wrote:> > > It assumes you know l-m-b and know where/how to get it. At this point, > > you reached the step 3: step by step instructions to flash the board, > > including how to get the tools.

Re: 11.08 Pre-built Images

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Jani Monoses wrote: > Hello, > > > On 08/26/2011 05:36 PM, Andy Doan wrote: > >> The 11.08 release includes some commonly used pre-built images. This >> mean you can now download a single file and "dd" it to your SD card >> without having to use linaro-media-creat

Re: Tracking Android kernel tips and Android builds

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > It's not enough if you still want to refer to it via SHA, due to repo > peculiarities. It should be also reachable from one of the live > branches (so, instead of a tag, a branch can be created right away). > Paul, what happened to the re

Re: A really awesome job, thank you!

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > I just wanted to make everyone aware of the fantastic job that the > infrastructure team and the validation team are doing to ensure that > our builds are extremely easy to use. > > > With the inclusion of test results on the build page: > >

Re: edge.validation.linaro.org

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Zygmunt Krynicki < zygmunt.kryni...@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi there. > > The validation team has a new edge website, http://edge.validation.linaro. > **org/ that reflects the development > trunk of all of our components. This site

Re: Tracking Android kernel tips and Android builds

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Paul Sokolovsky < paul.sokolov...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:42:29 +0200 > Alexander Sack wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Paul Sokolovsky > > > > wrote: > > > > > It's not en

Re: Tracking Android kernel tips and Android builds

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:09 AM, James Westby wrote: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:10:10 -0500, Zach Pfeffer > wrote: > > There's no reason to do it now, because its solving the wrong problem. > > The problem is sha's disappear. We use sha's because the provide > > immovable references to the state of

Re: edge.validation.linaro.org

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Zygmunt Krynicki < zygmunt.kryni...@linaro.org> wrote: > W dniu 31.08.2011 01:30, Alexander Sack pisze: > >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Zygmunt Krynicki< >> zygmunt.kryni...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> Hi there.

Re: CFP : Have a Beagle or Beagle XM with a USB wifi?

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Tom Gall wrote: > What we want to do for the next linaro release 11.09 is have working > USB wifi support out of the box on beagle/beagle xm with the developer > image. > > Tho you won't have to twist my arm hard at all to include BT in that > goal as well Tony :-

Re: Tracking Android kernel tips and Android builds

On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 02:19:08PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > > Hello Christian, > > > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:43:40 -0300 > > Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:25:15PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky

Re: Code review request.

On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Vishal Bhoj wrote: > Hi, > > > Bluetooth is working now on pandaboard now.I could scan and pair with my > phone.I have not tried file transfer yet. > > Thats really great news Vishal. Well done! > > These are multiple commits to gerrit to enable single feature i

Re: Releasing Linaro-patched repo tool, was: Re: Tracking Android kernel tips and Android builds

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:36:48 +0300 > Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > > Ok, patched repo is available as: > > http://android.git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=tools/repo.git;a=blob_plain;f=repo;hb=refs/heads/linaro-stable > that file should be downloaded an

Re: Releasing Linaro-patched repo tool, was: Re: Tracking Android kernel tips and Android builds

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote: > On 6 September 2011 08:28, Fathi Boudra wrote: > > On 6 September 2011 00:15, Alexander Sack wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Paul Sokolovsky > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, 5 S

Re: Non-FOSS license acceptance by robots

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011, Tony Mansson wrote: > > The Snowball s/w design team decided to use the debian mechanism for > > license acceptance of h/w-pack binaries, so there are pop-ups when you > > run Linaro-Media-Create. > > Is this a debconf n

Re: Linaro 11.08 released

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 08:53:06AM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote: > > http://www.linaro.org/downloads/ had received some lifting. It's still a > work > > in progress but it should resolved some of the issue raised. Please, take > a > > l

Re: Non-FOSS license acceptance by robots

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:39:08AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011, Tony Mansson wrote: > > > The Snowball s/w design team decided to use the debian mechanism for > > > license acceptance of h/w-pack binaries, so there a

Re: First 11.09 Linaro Android Candidate Builds are done for (Linux 3.0.3, GCC 4.6, libjpegturbo) Panda, Beagle, Beagle xM, iMX53, Origen, Snowball

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:09:55PM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > > The term "Stage" is used to indicate builds that contain patches that > > haven't been upstreamed. > > That a pretty confusing term. Are we sure we want to call it tha

  1   2   3   >