On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Andy Green <andy.gr...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 07/04/2011 10:25 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Andy Green<andy.gr...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> >>> It would be less ridiculous than issuing monthly tarballs for the kernel >>> case. >> >> why do you think that tarballs are ridiculous? even kernel.org >> releases tarballs last I looked. IMO you can prefectly have tags + >> tarballs coexist and everbody would be happy. > > Because there are few or no people that want a fly frozen in amber for a > kernel divorced from its patch history and context to add patches to. >
https://launchpad.net/linux-linaro/2.6.39/2.6.39-2011.06 suggests that there are more than zero interested in our 11.06 tarball at least ;). -- - Alexander _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
