On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Christian Robottom Reis <k...@linaro.org>wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:09:55PM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > > The term "Stage" is used to indicate builds that contain patches that > > haven't been upstreamed. > > That a pretty confusing term. Are we sure we want to call it that? > This comes out of me complaining to android team that they titled everything that didn't use mainline kernel as "LEB", no matter how well that worked, no matter what level of hardware enablement those builds came with, no matter if those builds are booting to UI or not. To avoid that we said that the technical/functional build name shouldn't include the term leb at all, but rather mark those builds as non-mainline in a different way. The term LEB would then become a badge (think about certification) that gets awarded by release team for builds _after_ they have gone through validation/testing and have been officially confirmed to meet LEB requirements. That said, I don't like the name "Stage" much either. Idea: How about we mark the ones that are not "stage" as "mainline" and drop the "stage" marker from the other build names? -- - Alexander Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
