On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Deepti Kalakeri <deepti.kalak...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Andrey Konovalov > <andrey.konova...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> On 05/17/2012 06:40 PM, Andy Green wrote: >>> >>> On 17/05/12 17:41, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >>>> >>>> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:34 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Greetings, >>>>> >>>>> So far I wasn't updating the linux-linaro tree since the 12.04 release. >>>>> (The generic topic updates were being done to the >>>>> linux-linaro-core-tracking tree) >>>>> >>>>> Now it is time to move the focus to the linux-linaro tree. For one week >>>>> it will use the mainline tip as the base. >>>> >>>> >>>> What happened to this? >> >> >> I had some minor conflicts and build failures, so kept the updated tree >> locally for a while. >> >> >>>> linux-linaro hasn't changed for 4 weeks now, so our vexpress 'tracking' >>>> builds of Android and Ubuntu are in fact the same kernels as the 12.04 >>>> release. >>> >>> >>> It doesn't matter as long as llct is moving - and it has been, Andrey is >>> doing a really nice job. If we can get all the LTs to base on llct, and >>> get all the important things standardized in llct, then everything will >>> come right. >> >> >> Actually, it (not moving linux-linaro forward for too long) was my fault.. >> Have pushed to the linux-linaro some time ago (no Samsung LT topics added >> yet). >> BTW, for llct I've added the linux-linaro-core-tracking-v3.4-rc7 tag just >> in case the v3.4-rc7 tree is needed. As llct tip has moved beyond v3.4-rc7. >> >> >>> Nobody cares that we glued a couple dozen patches from ARM LT on one >>> other LT tree as a one-off. >> >> >> linux-linaro tree is used by some CI jobs. To have the 12.05 stuff being >> tested in LAVA and such, I should have updated the linux-linaro tree as >> early as possible. > > > Should we stop to build linux-linaro and switch to llct or continue to build > linux-linaro and include llct builds as well?
llct is a convenience tag used by LTs that have their own tree. We always said we won't validate and test that alone also because it does not include enablement and testing/validating it properly is not possible. -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
