Probably related or same issue. On the old site I was able to
download hwpacks with for example:
wget -q -k --no-cookies --header 'Cookie: redirectlicensephp=200'
http://oldsnapshots.linaro.org/precise/hwpacks/lt-snowball/latest/hwpack_linaro-lt-snowball_20120815-254_armhf_supported.tar.gz
This
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 10:16 AM, John Rigby wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 14:05 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
>>> Here is a summary of the updates from 2012.07.
>>
>>> All jobs are in this view:
>&
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 14:05 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
>> Here is a summary of the updates from 2012.07.
>
>> All jobs are in this view:
>> https://ci.linaro.org/jenkins/view/New%20Ubuntu%20Packaged%20Kernels
Here is a summary of the updates from 2012.07.
Naming convention:
*linux-linaro-SOCNAM* use Andrey's linux-linaro branch
*linux-linaro-lt-SOCNAME* use a landing team branch
*linux-linaro-llt-SOCNAME* use Andrey's linux-linaro-tracking branch
(3.4 based)
3.5 jobs disabled because linux-lina
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:35 AM, David Cullen
wrote:
> Hello, John,
>
> On 7/10/2012 5:39 PM, John Rigby wrote:
>> There will shortly be a new kernel
>> linux-linaro-lt-omap-3.4_3.4.0-1.1~120710203036 in the kernel ppa:
>> https://code.launchpad.net/~linaro-maintain
Cullen
wrote:
> Hello, John,
>
> On 7/10/2012 12:52 PM, John Rigby wrote:
>> I thnk we need to start at the beginning. Where did you get the
>> source you are working with. In your original post I assumed that
>> this was source extracted with dpkg-source from a linaro ke
g config-3.4.0-1-linaro-lt-omap as my initial .config. A
> search for INIT_PASS_ALL_PARAMS in the Kconfig files produces no
> results:
>
> find . -name Kconfig -exec grep -H INIT_PASS_ALL_PARAMS '{}' ';'
>
> When I extract the source to a temporary di
just remove it
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:15 AM, David Cullen
wrote:
> Hello, John,
>
> On 7/9/2012 9:20 PM, John Rigby wrote:
>> This is probably a bug in the new kernel packaging scripts. I will
>> check into it.
>
>
> Can I just remove the "kernel_build&qu
This is probably a bug in the new kernel packaging scripts. I will
check into it.
--john
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 2:30 PM, David Cullen
wrote:
> Hello, linaro-dev,
>
> I just created a TAGS file for the Linaro kernel source and I
> noticed that there is a "kernel_build" subdirectory:
>
> /hom
>
>
> This is done. llt-20120626.0 should be ok (build tested with CPU_IDLE
> enabled).
> BTW, compared to the previous llt-20120613.0, llt-20120626.0 has vexpress
> support, and (as a side effect of adding vexpress) gator upgraded from
> 5.10.0 to 5.10.1.
>
>
I will add an llt-vexpress-3.4 kernel
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 08:15 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>
>> > Now, if the Ubuntu kernel packaging scripts could gain an option to
>> > generate
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 12:45 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> On 06/06/2012 07:09 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>> > Are we going to start using the config fragments we created a while ago?
>> > (Or did we not reach consensus on that?)
>> I
http://summit.linaro.org/lcq2-12/meeting/20856/ubuntu-leb-review-current-ci-process/
is not specific to kernel ci but seems to be the best match
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:41 AM, John Rigby wrote:
> I think there is a kernel ci session.
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Alexa
I think there is a kernel ci session.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:03 PM, John Rigby wrote:
>> Lets discuss this next week. I understand your point about the squid proxy.
>
> Sounds good. Is there a particular session where
Lets discuss this next week. I understand your point about the squid proxy.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Deepti Kalakeri
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:17 AM, John Rigby wrote:
>>>
&
I see this pop up with hovering over some kernel ci jobs in build queue:
'All nodes of label "kernel_cloud" are offline'
Does this mean something is broken or will it recover on its own?
--john
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
h
I believe from experience on a local host that having a precloned tree
of for example current upstream linus on jenkins to use with
--reference could be a huge win. We can discuss this in the kernel-ci
session at connect.
--john
___
linaro-dev mailing
We need an irc aggregator to flatten all the channels to one on rx and
broadcast on tx for those of use who want to live in a flat world (only
half kidding:)
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Andy Doan wrote:
> On 05/10/2012 03:57 AM, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:36 AM, A
Paul,
Not sure if it has anything to do with the upgrade but I am not able
to create new jobs, I tried with and without the copy existing
option.
https://pastebin.linaro.org/529/
--john
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Paul Sokolovsky
wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2012 12:53:15 +0300
> Paul Sokolovsk
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:50 AM, John Rigby wrote:
> Version 12.04 of Linaro U-Boot has been released. Details on Launchpad here:
> https://launchpad.net/u-boot-linaro/trunk/12.04
>
Thanks to multiple people pointing out that upstream had updated to
v2012.04.01 to include some critica
Version 12.04 of Linaro U-Boot has been released. Details on Launchpad here:
https://launchpad.net/u-boot-linaro/trunk/12.04
And on git.linaro.org here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=boot/u-boot-linaro-stable.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/Linaro-u-boot-2012.04
>From the release notes:
This releas
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:24:51PM -0500, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
>> == Omar Ramirez ==
>>
>> === Highlights ===
>>
>> * Working on device tree for mailbox:
>>
>> Find a kernel that works with DT for pandaboard (OMAP4):
>> - k3.4
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012, John Rigby wrote:
>> Looks like initial git clones always fail. I tried a simple job that
>> just trys to run git and it fails.
>
> Alexander noticed too; new ci.linaro.org setup was launchi
Looks like initial git clones always fail. I tried a simple job that
just trys to run git and it fails.
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Added u-boot-linaro to existing bug. Marked the qemu bug invalid.
Will fix soon.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 21 February 2012 20:55, John Rigby wrote:
>> Forwarding to all after I realized my answer only went to Peter:
>> That manifest entry point
Forwarding to all after I realized my answer only went to Peter:
That manifest entry points to the u-boot-tools package which is
userland package containing mkimage so not really what you want.
Your email reminds me we need to do this better like we now do for the
kernel. But that does not help y
maybe this will help?
http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-1063566.html
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:33 AM, E V wrote:
> Sorry for the late response. Got some problems at work, and left this for
> some while. Now, I have been asigned back to it, and keeps the same.
>
> I turned off power us
the panda results page it view only for me, I'm sure I must be doing
something wrong
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Just like to announce the Ubuntu LEB 12.01 RC images, and the pointers
> for people that want to check the testing progress and such (or ev
, Jan 13, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:52 PM, John Rigby wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>>> For everyone who packages kernel trees:
>>>
>>>
>>> I've had some questions about getting
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> For everyone who packages kernel trees:
>
>
> I've had some questions about getting the source for linaro kernel
> packaged, and it seems that this is still not straightforward:
>
...
This seems reasonable to me. This month we are adding CI a
Thanks Eric, I'll get these into 2012.1.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Eric Miao wrote:
> The following changes since commit cba9a894fdb1cb49b60fcd1d1d6919cbd7995dd5:
>
> Prepare v2011.12 (2011-12-23 20:25:35 +0100)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://git.linaro.org/bsp/frees
With the latest 3.1.5 merge linux-linaro-3.1 fails to build on Jenkins:
https://ci.linaro.org/jenkins/view/All%20CI/job/linux-linaro-3.1_panda-omap2plus/303/
GEN .version
CHK include/generated/compile.h
UPD include/generated/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/buil
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Lalancette, Christopher
wrote:
> Hello John,
> I'm currently working on bringing up a new OMAP4 board that is
> similar in many respects to the pandaboard. While playing around with
> the panda, I've noticed that upstream u-boot (from denx.de) has several
> pro
support for smdkv310 board
13d38b1 arm/dt: Add Pandaboard devicetree support
I left out the tegra and irq stuff. This works for panda I have not
tested any other platforms yet.
--john
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:33 PM, John Rigby wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Nicolas Pitre
>
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>
>> This tree seems to be missing per board dt support so booting with a
>> device tree doesn't seem to work. Need something like for example
>> this commit that added
This tree seems to be missing per board dt support so booting with a
device tree doesn't seem to work. Need something like for example
this commit that added it for panda in the 3.0 tree:
commit d24e9a194c2ed4ca56b8f4e7d96038cd3af3fda8
Author: Grant Likely
Date: Tue Jul 5 23:42:31 2011 -0600
Until this patchset:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/129800
mx51 and mx53 could not be compiled into kernel together so our
upstream only mx hwpack is mx51 only
We will be able to change that now with these patches.
--john
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Christian Robotto
Thanks Robert.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Robert Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Robert Nelson
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:02 PM, John Rigby wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Robert Nelson
>>> wrote:
>>>>
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Robert Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Tom Gall wrote:
>> What we want to do for the next linaro release 11.09 is have working
>> USB wifi support out of the box on beagle/beagle xm with the developer
>> image.
>>
>> Tho you won't have to twist m
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:03:21PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:42:39AM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
>> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 09:54:56PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> > > > AS arch/ar
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>
>> I'm having trouble building the Thumb2 kernel on, I actually believe
>> this same code worked some time ago before a toolchain update. There
>> are actually two pro
>
> Can you please enable these Kconfig options in our configs? By default
> SCHED_MC/SMT expose a /sys interface and are disabled by default (0).
>
> Possible values are:
>
> 0 - No power saving load balance (default value)
> 1 - Fill one thread/core/package first for long running threads
> 2 -
My first request would be for board level device tree support.
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Zach Pfeffer
>> wrote:
>>> In-order to make reproducible builds we create pinned manifests with
>>> each commit explicitly listed. We also use thi
I thought this was new but it has been around for awhile. My default
config was not turning on THUMB2 kernel so I only saw it today.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:12 AM, John Rigby wrote:
> Nicolas, Dave,
>
> make omap4_defconfig
> make menuconfig and turn on THUMB2_KERNEL
> mak
Nicolas, Dave,
make omap4_defconfig
make menuconfig and turn on THUMB2_KERNEL
make
.
CC arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.o
AS arch/arm/kernel/relocate_kernel.o
arch/arm/kernel/relocate_kernel.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/kernel/relocate_kernel.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Andy Doan wrote:
> On 06/21/2011 04:53 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:52:12PM +0530, Amit Mahajan wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 12:14 +0530, Avik Sil wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 June 2011 12:06 PM, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> > > > Hi,
>>
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>
>> Nicolas,
>>
>> Is device tree stuff equivalent to what was in .38 going in? I'm
>> looking for the equivalent of what went into .38 in commit
>> 3fb7bd037f31
-n "Ubuntu boot script" \
-d ./boot.txt \
/media/boot/boot.scr
unmount it and try it.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:45 PM, John Rigby wrote:
> There is a packaged kernel work in progress here:
> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=ubuntu/linux-linaro-oneiric.git;a=summary
> git:/
There is a packaged kernel work in progress here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=ubuntu/linux-linaro-oneiric.git;a=summary
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-linaro-oneiric.git
It is based on a snapshot of linux-linaro-2.6.39 from today plus sauce
and packaging from Ubuntu-2.6.39-3.10.
The bad new
Nicolas,
Is device tree stuff equivalent to what was in .38 going in? I'm
looking for the equivalent of what went into .38 in commit
3fb7bd037f31f5acdc213c0eb431c07a38803445
Merge branch 'devicetree/arm-linaro-2.6.38' of
git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 into linaro-2.6.38
Thanks,
John
___
Can you enter a bug for this so I don't forget to make these =y if
that is all it takes to fix this.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Andy Doan wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 10:44 AM, John Rigby wrote:
>> I intend to make this better this cycle. The various flavours will be more
>>
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:31:51AM +0100, Andy Green wrote:
>> On 06/07/2011 10:58 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
>> Hi -
>>
>> >>It was the output produced by running the commands listed at
>> >>https://wiki.linaro.org/Resour
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:33:27PM +0200, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
>> One of the things it does not capture currently is kernel
>> configuration. Assuming you can cat /proc/config it would be easy to
>> capture that as well but I woul
tree, so more stuff will be merged. Only smoke tested on a Dove board,
>> and compile tested for OMAP so far.
>>
>
> I just tried some testing of my Overo with the omap2plus_defconfig and
> my hack for what John Rigby uses for Linaro builds.
>
> The "Linaro config&q
Speaking about Ubuntu packaged kernels only...
Everything that goes into the source package is in git.
Every release has a signed tag.
Ubuntu kernel package names have a strict naming convention that makes
upgrading and abi checking work right, so from my perspective putting
the tag name somewhere
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Tom Gall wrote:
> I've also seen it on my beagle Xm from time to time. Agree, be nice to
> figure out who is
> blocked and why.
>
ok, its not the wireless driver mishaving then
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@list
I have only seen this with the wireless problem already noted. Can
you see if blacklisting the wireless driver fixes the problem?
echo blacklist wl12xx_sdio > /etc/modeprobe.d/blacklist-wireless.conf
reboot
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm
/drivers/net/wireless/wl12*
everything else works.
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Jaswinder Singh
wrote:
> On 19 May 2011 00:01, John Rigby wrote:
>> Thanks to the heroic efforts of rsalveti the packaged
>> linux-linaro-omap kernel now greatly improved omap4 display
>> funct
Thanks to the heroic efforts of rsalveti the packaged
linux-linaro-omap kernel now greatly improved omap4 display
functionality. There is a .deb in the linaro-maintainers kernel ppa.
If you have a panda board and have time to try it out your feedback
would be much appreciated:
https://launchpad.n
Scott,
It would be nice to have some landing team folks subscribe to
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/linaro-platforms-o-kernel-leb-process
I believe we have had some chaos at the end of both release cycles so
far with trying to add additional features to the packaged kernel. It
wo
packaging added.
It currently has no video on omap3.
John
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>
>> Is the plan to include the "testing" branch for this cycle?
>
> I'd like to have confirmation that it do
Hi Nicolas,
make omap2plus_defconfig
then
edit .config and remove CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2=y line
then
make oldconfig and turn on CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL
then make uImage
LD vmlinux
SYSMAP System.map
SYSMAP .tmp_System.map
OBJCOPY arch/arm/boot/Image
Kernel: arch/arm/boot/Image is ready
Ok, thanks.
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 2 May 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>
>> Nicolas, Andy,
>>
>> I see that Andy's stuff went into linux-linaro-2.6.38 earlier. What
>> new CONFIG_'s do I need to turn on in the pac
Nicolas, Andy,
I see that Andy's stuff went into linux-linaro-2.6.38 earlier. What
new CONFIG_'s do I need to turn on in the packaged kernel to ensure we
get all the fabulous new stuff enabled?
Thanks,
John
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists
Is the plan to include the "testing" branch for this cycle?
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Nicolas Pitre
wrote:
> Andy Green has worked on a set of patches adding many features to OMAP4
> such as HDMI audio/video, FM receiver, etc. Before I merge that into
> the Linaro kernel tree I need some
Thanks!
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>
>> Not sure who to send this to so including Nicolas and Linus.
>>
>> make u8500_defconfig
>> make uImage
>>
>> produces some undefined referen
Not sure who to send this to so including Nicolas and Linus.
make u8500_defconfig
make uImage
produces some undefined reference errors. Tail of the build log attached.
Thanks,
John
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
make[1]: `include/generated/mach-types.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear John Rigby,
>
> In message you wrote:
>>
>> So Wolfgang, let's assume that Fastboot could coexist with and share
>> code with the DFU implementation. Would that be more acceptable? Or
>
> I
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>> So, "Google uses it aside", it seems that being able to boot via USB
>>> is a useful thing and fastboot is a particular solution; I'm not
>>> entirely sure what other USB u-boot extensions exist apart from those
>>
>> Well, DFU support is a
Nicolas, Andy:
I noticed this commit:
This introduces a defconfig version of Sebastien Jan's reference
config for Panda.
To use the defconfig, you need to use the following scheme to
expand it back to being a full config
make ARCH=arm defconfig
cat arch/arm/configs/omap4_defconfig >>.config
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jim Huang,
>
> In message you wrote:
>>
>> My idea is that we require abstract 'bootloader' component in Android
>> device/linaro/common, and (patched) 'u-boot' would be the provider of
>> 'bootloader' component in
>> device/linaro/Lin
fy in board configurations since we might
>>>>>> migrate to other 'fastboot' compatible boot loader implementations
>>>>>> such as lk (little kernel) used in Qualcomm patform.
>>>>>
>>>>> I haven't gotten into lk to
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Following macros can be enabled,
> CONFIG_CPU_IDLE,
> CONFIG_PM,
> CONFIG_PM_DEBUG
Currently fails to compile with CONFIG_PM on.
>
> Thanks,
> Amit Daniel
>
>
>
> On 11 April 2011 10:52, J
Amitk, So can I turn on all the CONFIG_PM* stuff for samsung now?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Amit Kachhap wrote:
>
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> I could not find this changes in the latest 2.6.38 Linaro kernel. Please
>> merge the patch from the below
>>
git rebase -i is a god send if you find yourself needing to rebase
often and it get even better when you learn about git rerere (google
it)
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Tixy wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 10:16 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
>
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Andy Green wrote:
> On 04/06/2011 09:24 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
>> I have the same problem. If I turn off the display then the board boots.
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-linaro-omap/+bug/752900
>>
>> Thanks to John
I have the same problem. If I turn off the display then the board boots.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-linaro-omap/+bug/752900
Thanks to John Stultz for making the connection that the hang was just as
the display gets set up on a successful boot.
Kernel config and boot logs ar
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Vishwanath Sripathy
wrote:
> Yes, Following options have to be enabled in the defconfig to enable cpufreq.
>
> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y
> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y
> CONFIG_OMAP_SMARTREFLEX=y
> CONFIG_OMAP_SMARTREFLEX_CLASS3=y
Done
>
> Vishwa
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011
The rebuilt branch is fine for me. My tree creation methodology is
patterned after the Ubuntu kernel which means I rebase to new
upstreams each release so I don't mind if my upstreams do as well.
John
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Nicolas Pitre
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As I've been work
against the Linaro
>> > u-boot tree.
>>
>> Which tree should I use, u-boot-linaro-stable or u-boot-linaro-next ?
>
> John Rigby would know better, but I suspect u-boot-linaro-next is the one to
> use.
>
> John, which tree should be used for targetting Natty?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On 22 March 2011 16:56, Andy Doan wrote:
>> On 03/22/2011 08:05 AM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
>>> That's to decide whether we should count the patches that belong to a
>>> series individually or not.
>>>
>>
>> Could you generate two sets of
This patch looks pretty safe.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=130045643531514&w=3
The bug is not critical but produces a lengthy kernel warning message
that may be alarming to some users.
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http:
Nicolas,
Today hrw pointed out this patch. It seems to be the proper fix for
the panda hang.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=130021624629574&w=2
John
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/li
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Andy Green wrote:
>> On 03/09/2011 09:04 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
I take it this magic of SMP or not is hidden in this config layering
scheme
you mentioned and it isn't re
John,
It should work with linux-linaro-2.6.38 with the correct config. Make
sure to turn off CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS_SDI as it cause a access fault. See
lp:720055.
John
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 5:51 PM, john stultz wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 18:57 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Feb 2011
Assembler in latest binutils needs extra option to enable smc
instructions introduced in:
ARM: omap3: Remove hand-encoded SMC instructions
Signed-off-by: John Rigby
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:18 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 10:17 +0200, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:32 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>> > My solution is to have a Kconfig.distro file, which is patched
>> > with Distro specific policy config, such as which filesystem
Nicolas,
With the patch:
ARM: 6746/1: remove the 4x expansion presumption while decompressing the kernel
I get a build error. This is when building my packaged kernel with
debuild. Notice the stat failure __after__ the "Kernel:
arch/arm/boot/Image is ready message". Then later ld fails becaus
h_strip.*pkghdr.*/echo skipping dh_strip for cross
build/' debian/rules.d/2-binary-arch.mk
Then debuild:
debuild -eCROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- -nc -ns -aarmel -b
If you have any questions please ask.
John
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:1
Dave,
Not sure if you noticed in the IRC logs so here is what happened for
the packaged release.
Pulled latest linux-linaro-2.6.38 that has your patches.
Fixed arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile to allow smc instructions in
arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
Disabled CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT.
The resulting k
ears to be related to commit:
>
> 98be69a ARM: omap3: Remove hand-encoded SMC instructions
>
> After doing a little searching, I stumbled across something similar from
> John Rigby:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129118316614865&w=2
>
> I "fixed" the p
I have a board with a uart breakout board. The info on the label is:
HREFP_1.1_V33_OM_S10
ID0079F3 1023 243
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dave told me he got 3 u8500 boards but no UART break out board. From
> what I have heard the u8500 boards for Linaro should co
U-Boot got faster in the last cycle (v2010.12). Cache is now enabled
on arm and multiblock reads were added to the mmc driver.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 21 January 2011 18:42:55 David Rusling wrote:
>> Yes, but isn't initrd slow to copy from the boot medi
Joey,
I entered a bug for this against the omap3 kernel. USB mouse and
keyboard work on beagle which uses the same kernel.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-linaro-omap/+bug/706033
John
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Joey Stanford
wrote:
> fwiw, I'm using the headless image on
Sorry for entering late here. Here are my questions:
How does l-m-c know about the boot partition convention? Is the fact
that omap wants a dos partition with some files on it but i.MX just
needs the raw bits at a fixed location on the card embedded in l-m-c?
If a new platform pops up with a com
The following changes since commit a581cf741c49c220d159fac1fdbde28255c2e7e3:
Merge branch 'linaro-stable' into linaro-packaged (2011-01-03 14:41:56 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/boot/u-boot-linaro-stable.git packaged
John Rigby (2):
de
The following changes since commit 935e2f757e75f23e9c1b760cd096746191383aea:
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.37.1000.1 (2010-11-26 21:20:11 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-meta-linaro-natty.git master
John Rigby (1):
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.37.1001.2
John Rigby (6):
LINARO: Start new release
LINARO: rebase on new upstreams
LINARO: remove ports cruft
LINARO: update configs
LINARO: better common package naming
LINARO: Linux-linaro-2.6.37-1001.4
.../abi/{2.6.37-1000.2 => 2.6.37-1000.3}/abiname |
The following changes since commit 61cb9ff7af265a28043724678b4d3b0482c2e525:
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1008.13 (2010-10-22 07:02:42 -0600)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-meta-linaro.git master
John Rigby (1):
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1010.14
meta
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
