Sorry for entering late here.  Here are my questions:

How does l-m-c know about the boot partition convention?  Is the fact
that omap wants a dos partition with some files on it but i.MX just
needs the raw bits at a fixed location on the card embedded in l-m-c?
If a new platform pops up with a completely different convention does
l-m-c need to be modified or could we put a script in the hwpack to do
that?

For map you could call a script with an argument pointing to the blown
out hwpack and and second argument pointing at the mounted boot
partition.
For mx first argument is the same second is a pointer to raw device.
So the hwpack would need a field to say if the scipt needs a raw
device or mounted dos partition and..
another field with the script name.

Is this over engineering?

Sorry for the noise,
John

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Loïc Minier <loic.min...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011, James Westby wrote:
>> Right, but what would they do? That's my point.
>>
>> If you really want to push Andoid in to v2 then we can write code to
>> identify/specify image type, then defer Android/linux_image combination
>> with a specific error message.
>>
>> The point of a format specifier is such that l-i-t won't try to act on
>> things that are added after that version was released. If the old code
>> won't do the wrong thing then we don't need a format bump.
>
>  That's exactly my point: have the next version of the code try to do
>  the right thing.  Maybe I actually have broken expectations: I expect
>  l-i-t would reject hwpacks with unknown fields.  That's the failure
>  I'm trying to avoid if we know we're going to introduce a linux_image
>  field and that it can be safely ignored.
>
>  It's a bit like when Debian introduced Breaks, by adding support to
>  dpkg to simply treat the field in a dumb way, and then adding full
>  support the next cycle, as to allow using old dpkg for upgrades.
>
> --
> Loïc Minier
>
> _______________________________________________
> linaro-dev mailing list
> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
>

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to