On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Andy Doan <andy.d...@linaro.org> wrote: > I just hit an issue cross-compiling the linux-linaro-2.6.37.git source. > I'm seeing errors for arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S like: > > Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode `smc #1' > > It appears to be related to commit: > > 98be69a ARM: omap3: Remove hand-encoded SMC instructions > > After doing a little searching, I stumbled across something similar from > John Rigby: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129118316614865&w=2 > > I "fixed" the problem on my system with this patch: > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile > index f6614a6..985bc89 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_SMARTREFLEX) += sr_device.o > smartre > obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_SMARTREFLEX_CLASS3) += smartreflex-class3.o > > AFLAGS_sleep24xx.o :=-Wa,-march=armv6 > -AFLAGS_sleep34xx.o :=-Wa,-march=armv7-a > +AFLAGS_sleep34xx.o :=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec) > > ifeq ($(CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE),y) > CFLAGS_pm_bus.o += -DDEBUG > > My question: Is this patch actually needed for cross-compiling our > kernel, or is there some additional argument I need to pass to Make when > building my kernel? My best guess is that Dave is not using the latest binutils but that is a bit surprising. I think this fix is the right thing, unless Dave has a better fix. > > FYI - My current command line looks like: > make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- O=out V=1 uImage modules > > -andy > > _______________________________________________ > linaro-dev mailing list > linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev >
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
